On 13-01-22 5:13 AM, Daniel wrote:
Roger, in a previous life, these support groups (or their forerunners)
were on the secnews.netscape.com news server and there, in the support
groups, the preference was to not trim at all.
When those groups closed and the move was made here, the policy changed.
Daniel wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
I can't remember how many definitive conclusions I've reached in
solving particular computer problems that I've had to walk back, but
it's been many, many. Usually, the farther out you travel on the
diagnostic tree, th
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
I can't remember how many definitive conclusions I've reached in
solving particular computer problems that I've had to walk back, but
it's been many, many. Usually, the farther out you travel on the
diagnostic tree, the more suspicio
On 01/21/2013 05:39 AM, Rickles wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
...
>>> OK, folks, it's time to start pruning.
>>>
>>> Did this message really need to include 158 lines of previous messages?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, Paul, it did, because that's how the poster wanted it!! ;-)
>>
> And yeah,
Rickles wrote:
And yeah, I did that to make it easier for a new reader to catch up,
because as a technical person, I've found that's easier that having to
to refer to different messages. Sorry if that gets up your nose, but
I've worked that way on electronics in the military, and now IT as a
ci
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>
>> I can't remember how many definitive conclusions I've reached in
>> solving particular computer problems that I've had to walk back, but
>> it's been many, many. Usually, the farther out you travel on the
>> diagnostic tree, the more suspicious you
Daniel wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
I can't remember how many definitive conclusions I've reached in solving
particular computer problems that I've had to walk back, but it's been
many,
many. Usually, the farther out you travel on the diagnostic tree, the
more
suspicious y
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
I can't remember how many definitive conclusions I've reached in solving
particular computer problems that I've had to walk back, but it's been
many,
many. Usually, the farther out you travel on the diagnostic tree, the
more
suspicious you need to be o
Roger Fink wrote:
I can't remember how many definitive conclusions I've reached in solving
particular computer problems that I've had to walk back, but it's been many,
many. Usually, the farther out you travel on the diagnostic tree, the more
suspicious you need to be of the latest definitive co
Rickles wrote:
> Rickles wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>> Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>> Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>> Michael Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> SM 2.15 effect
Rickles wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I
had SM 2.13 installed and r
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I
had SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA appl
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I
had SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling
Rickles wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>> Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Michael Gordon wrote:
>>>
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I
had SM 2.13 installed and r
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had
SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in
the Ad-Ons
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Rickles wrote:
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had
SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in
the Ad-Ons Manager. Last n
Roger Fink wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> Rickles wrote:
>>> Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Michael Gordon wrote:
>
>> SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had
>> SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in
>> the Ad-
Roger Fink wrote:
> Rickles wrote:
>> Roger Fink wrote:
>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
> SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had
> SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in the
> Ad-Ons Manager. Last night I u
Rickles wrote:
> Roger Fink wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Michael Gordon wrote:
>>>
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had
SM 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in the
Ad-Ons Manager. Last night I upgraded to SM 2.15 and JAVA
Roger Fink wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had SM
2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in the
Ad-Ons Manager. Last night I upgraded to SM 2.15 and JAVA applets
would not run. ...
Side note
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Michael Gordon wrote:
>
>> SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had SM
>> 2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in the
>> Ad-Ons Manager. Last night I upgraded to SM 2.15 and JAVA applets
>> would not run. ...
>>
>> Side note:
Michael Gordon wrote:
SM 2.15 effectively blocks all versions of JAVA. Yesterday I had SM
2.13 installed and running JAVA applets by enabling JAVA in the Ad-Ons
Manager. Last night I upgraded to SM 2.15 and JAVA applets would not run.
...
Side note: Internet Explorer, v.8, has no problem wi
22 matches
Mail list logo
