Re: Printed Phone Numbers

On 11/8/2010 1:23 PM James wrote: Daniel wrote: James wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:02:23 +0200, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: In the old days, there was no 'optional' way to dial. Optional became p

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

On 10-11-08 1:23 PM, James wrote: The reason for the formatting differences is because of how those numbers were processed. Guys, what does this discussion have to do with SeaMonkey? If nothing, please re-read , and note the section on stayi

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Daniel wrote: James wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:02:23 +0200, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: In the old days, there was no 'optional' way to dial. Optional became possible with digital computers on t

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

James wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:02:23 +0200, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: In the old days, there was no 'optional' way to dial. Optional became possible with digital computers on telephone equipm

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Ray_Net wrote: James wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, JohnW-Mpls a tapoté, le 31/10/2010 18:31: Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separa

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

W3BNR wrote: And BTW - I do NOT have to use the '1' when using either of my cell phones. One of which is on Verizon and the other is a TrackPhone. You do, you just don't realize the phone is inserting it for you. The phone company's switches still need to hear it. -- War doesn't determine w

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

James wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, JohnW-Mpls a tapoté, le 31/10/2010 18:31: Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-121

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

W3BNR wrote: On 11/7/2010 9:40 AM W3BNR wrote: On 11/7/2010 9:31 AM James wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: < S N I P > Outside the local calling area but within the same area code, a "1" must be dialed before the prefix and number. Do not use the area code as the call will fail. Outside t

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

W3BNR wrote: On 11/7/2010 9:31 AM James wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: < S N I P > Outside the local calling area but within the same area code, a "1" must be dialed before the prefix and number. Do not use the area code as the call will fail. Outside the area code and outside the local

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

On 11/7/2010 9:40 AM W3BNR wrote: On 11/7/2010 9:31 AM James wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: < S N I P > Outside the local calling area but within the same area code, a "1" must be dialed before the prefix and number. Do not use the area code as the call will fail. Outside the area code and

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

On 11/7/2010 9:31 AM James wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: < S N I P > Outside the local calling area but within the same area code, a "1" must be dialed before the prefix and number. Do not use the area code as the call will fail. Outside the area code and outside the loc

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, JohnW-Mpls a tapoté, le 31/10/2010 18:31: Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use o

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:02:23 +0200, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to be growing. Any ad

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, JohnW-Mpls a tapoté, le 31/10/2010 18:31: Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separato

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to be growing. Any advantage of one over the other? What I've seen as mostly recommended and widely use

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Hi, JohnW-Mpls a tapoté, le 31/10/2010 18:31: > Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of > viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. > > For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but > use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) s

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:02:23 +0200, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to be growing. Any advantage of one over the oth

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:02:23 +0200, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to be growing. Any advantage of one over the other? What I've seen as most

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

JohnW-Mpls wrote: Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to be growing. Any advantage of

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:31:37 -0500, /JohnW-Mpls/: For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to be growing. Any advantage of one over the other? What I've seen as mostly recommended and widely used in examples is that "onl

Re: Printed Phone Numbers

On 10/31/10 9:31 AM, JohnW-Mpls wrote: > Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of > viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. > > For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but > use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to

Printed Phone Numbers

Wrong venue for this subject but people here represent a variety of viewpoints and more important, think about details like this. For years, all phone numbers had hyphen separators (212-555-1212) but use of the dot separator (212.555.1212) seems to be growing. Any advantage of one over the other?