John wrote:
In article,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to "get Linux/Unix!"
and Be In Charge! ;-)
Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps, when
you have Mac OSX which is Unix?
Use you can boot into single use
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John wrote:
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to "get
Linux/Unix!" and Be In Charge! ;-)
Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps,
when you have Mac OSX which is Unix?
I do not know w
John wrote:
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>> Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to "get
>> Linux/Unix!" and Be In Charge! ;-)
>
> Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps,
> when you have Mac OSX which is Unix?
I do not know what you mean when you s
In article ,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to "get Linux/Unix!"
> and Be In Charge! ;-)
Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps, when
you have Mac OSX which is Unix?
--
Are there errors in the Bible? How should
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
BeeNeR wrote:
My thoughts are that SM developers should unbundle the 'Composer'
feature. Make it an add-on for those that want it.
My recollection is that the installation of Composer can be refused
during Se
Phillip Jones wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> BeeNeR wrote:
>>> My thoughts are that SM developers should unbundle the 'Composer'
>>> feature. Make it an add-on for those that want it.
>>
>> My recollection is that the installation of Composer can be refused
>> during SeaMonkey setup,
Hi John:
If SM is like the old Netscape then it already has the ability to UPLOAD
web pages.
It's done by browsing to the ftp site then drag and drop the file from
your computer to the web page.
I've been using Composer since it came out in Netscape 3.0.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://ww
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
BeeNeR wrote:
---snip---
My thoughts are that SM developers should unbundle the 'Composer'
feature. Make it an add-on for those that want it.
My recollection is that the installation of Composer can be refused
during SeaMonkey se
BeeNeR wrote:
> John typed the following:
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>>> John wrote:
That was not the question. I already have 2 good FTP clients. But I
wnat this capability built into sea monkey.
>>>
>>> Why would you want the developers to bloat up SeaMonkey with
>>> someth
On or about 4/3/2010 5:46 AM, John typed the following:
> In article ,
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>
>> John wrote:
>>
>>> That was not the question. I already have 2 good FTP clients. But I
>>> wnat this capability built into sea monkey.
>>
>> Why would you want the developers to bloat u
In article ,
Bernard Mercier wrote:
> Le 30/03/2010, John a supposé :
> > When will Sea monkey be able to upload websites with ease to a server?
> > Currently I have to MANUALLY type in the remote folder name which I dont
> > always know.
> There are programs in Windows which perform automatic
In article ,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> John wrote:
>
> > That was not the question. I already have 2 good FTP clients. But I
> > wnat this capability built into sea monkey.
>
> Why would you want the developers to bloat up SeaMonkey with something
> that perhaps 1-2% of users even kno
Philip Chee wrote:
>Kaze is currently busy backporting KompoZer
>to comm-central/seamonkey trunk.
>KompoZer uses FireFTP for normal FTP uploads
>and a compiled binary for SFTP uploads.
>Perhaps we'll see what happens
>when Kaze completes his backport.
>
A good guy to have working with the team.
htt
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:04:00 +0200, Ray_Net wrote:
> S. Beaulieu wrote:
>> Ray_Net a écrit :
>>> SM will never do that , because SM is not a suite for creating websites.
>>
>>
>> Well, to be honest, one could argue that the fact that Composer comes
>> prepackageed with it makes it so and thus shoul
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Ray_Net a écrit :
SM will never do that , because SM is not a suite for creating websites.
Well, to be honest, one could argue that the fact that Composer comes
prepackageed with it makes it so and thus should provide such a function.
S.
So, it's better that SM drop the "
Ray_Net a écrit :
SM will never do that , because SM is not a suite for creating websites.
Well, to be honest, one could argue that the fact that Composer comes
prepackageed with it makes it so and thus should provide such a function.
S.
___
suppo
John wrote:
In article,
Ray_Net wrote:
John wrote:
When will Sea monkey be able to upload websites with ease to a server?
Currently I have to MANUALLY type in the remote folder name which I dont
always know.
Use FileZilla free and perfect use for this purpose.
That was not the question.
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:45:59 -0400, BeeNeR wrote:
> On or about 3/30/2010 9:33 PM, John typed the following:
>> In article ,
>> BeeNeR wrote:
>>
>>> Have you tried FireFTP? It works with SM 2.x.x
>>> http://fireftp.mozdev.org/
>>
>> That was not the question. I already have 2 good FTP clients
Le 30/03/2010, John a supposé :
> When will Sea monkey be able to upload websites with ease to a server?
> Currently I have to MANUALLY type in the remote folder name which I dont
> always know.
There are programs in Windows which perform automatically what you request.
(google is your friend)
Th
John wrote:
> That was not the question. I already have 2 good FTP clients. But I
> wnat this capability built into sea monkey.
Why would you want the developers to bloat up SeaMonkey with something
that perhaps 1-2% of users even know what it is? With either of your 2
good FTP clients, you're a
On or about 3/30/2010 9:33 PM, John typed the following:
> In article ,
> BeeNeR wrote:
>
>> Have you tried FireFTP? It works with SM 2.x.x
>> http://fireftp.mozdev.org/
>
> That was not the question. I already have 2 good FTP clients. But I wnat
> this capability built into sea monkey.
in t
In article ,
Ray_Net wrote:
> John wrote:
> > When will Sea monkey be able to upload websites with ease to a server?
> > Currently I have to MANUALLY type in the remote folder name which I dont
> > always know.
>
> Use FileZilla free and perfect use for this purpose.
That was not the question.
In article ,
BeeNeR wrote:
> Have you tried FireFTP? It works with SM 2.x.x
> http://fireftp.mozdev.org/
That was not the question. I already have 2 good FTP clients. But I wnat
this capability built into sea monkey.
--
Are there errors in the Bible? How should a church
conduct its worship
On or about 3/30/2010 5:34 PM, Ray_Net typed the following:
> John wrote:
>> When will Sea monkey be able to upload websites with ease to a server?
>> Currently I have to MANUALLY type in the remote folder name which I dont
>> always know.
>
> Use FileZilla free and perfect use for this purpose.
John wrote:
When will Sea monkey be able to upload websites with ease to a server?
Currently I have to MANUALLY type in the remote folder name which I dont
always know.
Use FileZilla free and perfect use for this purpose.
___
support-seamonkey mailing
25 matches
Mail list logo
