Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-07-02 Thread No
JD wrote: William Greenwood wrote: JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-07-02 Thread JD
No wrote: JD wrote: William Greenwood wrote: JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-07-02 Thread Philip Chee
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 06:46:25 -0400, No wrote: JD - A few of the add-on's which do not work for me, that I want to use include: password exporter, folderpane tools, password maker and, user agent switcher. Your assistance would be great in getting these working. I just deleted

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-07-01 Thread Jens Hatlak
Ray_Net wrote: I don't need -Bookmak This Grouo of Tabs(greyed) Hmm, I won't help you shoot yourself in the foot there. This is a normal functionality to me. You could just as well start removing entries from the menus... If you really want to go ahead you'd have to either use the DOM

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-06-30 Thread William Greenwood
JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my real bookmarks - this is very annoying

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-06-30 Thread Ray_Net
JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my real bookmarks - this is very annoying

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-06-30 Thread Ray_Net
JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my real bookmarks - this is very annoying

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-06-30 Thread Ray_Net
Ray_Net wrote: JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my real bookmarks - this is

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-06-30 Thread JD
William Greenwood wrote: JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my real

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-06-30 Thread Rick Merrill
Ray_Net wrote: JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my real bookmarks - this is

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-06-29 Thread JD
Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my real bookmarks - this is very annoying ... I don't