Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

El 11/09/15 a las 02:13, Ed Mullen escribió: > NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM: >> How ironic... an add-on to fix the add-on manager! >> > > Ironic and idiotic. Er... I have Firefox Aurora (42.0a2) installed in my mobile and the add-on versions are shown in about:addons, so it is not related to

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

On 9/11/2015 1:55 PM, EE wrote: > Mr. Ed wrote: >> On 9/10/2015 8:13 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: >>> NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM: On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: > Exalm wrote: >>> >> They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO >> review

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Mr. Ed wrote: On 9/10/2015 8:13 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM: On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: Exalm wrote: They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review So how about

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1 - add-on version numbers no longer shown in add-On-Manager

A Williams пишет: That is marked WONTFIX. What about submitting a bug against the root of this behaviour: Firefox. It's Toolkit in this case. But I can assure you it'll be WONTFIXed (or more probably DUPed) immediately with someone saying it was by design. __

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Mr. Ed пишет: And on a second thought, what's all the fuss about anyway? Who cares what version an add-on is if it works. If it's not up to date SM checks on startup and lets you know. Even installs the update if there is one. If you try to load one that doesn't work with SM modify it. If yo

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1 - add-on version numbers no longer shown in add-On-Manager

Rainer Bielefeld wrote: On 09.09.2015 01:13, NoOp wrote: Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? Hello, please see "Bug 1202990 - Add-on Manager needs special add-on to show add-on-versions" CU Rainer That is

OT DST?? (was: Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1)

On 11/09/2015 11:30 AM, Mr. Ed wrote: Last updated: Thu Sep 10 2015 21:23:27 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time) Ed, aren't you guys currently on Daylight Savings Time?? -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150223

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1 - add-on version numbers no longer shown in add-On-Manager

On 09.09.2015 01:13, NoOp wrote: Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? Hello, please see "Bug 1202990 - Add-on Manager needs special add-on to show add-on-versions" CU Rainer

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Mr. Ed wrote: On 9/10/2015 9:30 PM, Mr. Ed wrote: On 9/10/2015 8:13 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM: On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: Exalm wrote: They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review So how about

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

On 9/10/2015 9:30 PM, Mr. Ed wrote: > On 9/10/2015 8:13 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: >> NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM: >>> On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: Exalm wrote: >> > They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review So how about

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

On 9/10/2015 8:13 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: > NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM: >> On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: >>> Exalm wrote: > They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review >>> >>> So how about >>>

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

NoOp wrote on 9/10/2015 3:12 PM: On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: Exalm wrote: They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review So how about ? Regards! How ironic... an add-on to fi

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Hank wrote: EE wrote: NoOp wrote: On 09/09/2015 03:44 AM, Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? By design, I'm afraid. Thanks Neil. I found the bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161183 Extension/plugin name is t

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Exalm wrote: Herrmann Hofer пишет: Exalm wrote: They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review So how about ? Regards! That isn't a theme. :) Extensions are indeed allowed to do that. If that

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Edmund Wong schrieb: Please give it a spin. Works fine so far. It's just, that after the SM2.35 update, I was surprised how "snappy" the browser felt. Now with 2.38b1 it feels a bit more sluggish again. Especially opening a new empty browser window feels like >2 seconds. Is there a differenc

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

On 09/10/2015 06:59 AM, Herrmann Hofer wrote: > Exalm wrote: >>> >> They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review > > So how about > ? > > Regards! > How ironic... an add-on to fix the add-on manage

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Herrmann Hofer пишет: Exalm wrote: They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review So how about ? Regards! That isn't a theme. :) Extensions are indeed allowed to do that.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Exalm wrote: They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review So how about ? Regards! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

EE wrote: NoOp wrote: On 09/09/2015 03:44 AM, Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? By design, I'm afraid. Thanks Neil. I found the bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161183 Extension/plugin name is truncated in n

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

EE пишет: So they (again) decided what we need to know and we do not have any alternative options. Would themes be able to change that back to the older format? They are technically able to do that, but that would never pass AMO review. See this: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

NoOp wrote: On 09/09/2015 03:44 AM, Neil wrote: NoOp wrote: Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? By design, I'm afraid. Thanks Neil. I found the bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161183 Extension/plugin name is truncated in new add-ons

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

On 09/09/2015 03:44 AM, Neil wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? > > By design, I'm afraid. > Thanks Neil. I found the bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161183 Extension/plugin name is truncated in new add-ons manag

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

NoOp wrote: Is this a bug or the way the new version will appear from now on? By design, I'm afraid. -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/su

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

NoOp wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, Can anyone believe it? It was only last week that we thrashed and fought against the problems with the SeaMonkey 2.35 release. This week, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38b1. Please give it a spin. For a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, Can anyone believe it? It was only last week that we thrashed and fought against the problems with the SeaMonkey 2.35 release. This week, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38b1. Please give it a spin. For a more complete

Re: SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Edmund Wong wrote: Greetings, Can anyone believe it? It was only last week that we thrashed and fought against the problems with the SeaMonkey 2.35 release. This week, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38b1. Please give it a spin. For a more complete

SeaMonkey 2.38b1

Greetings, Can anyone believe it? It was only last week that we thrashed and fought against the problems with the SeaMonkey 2.35 release. This week, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.38b1. Please give it a spin. For a more complete list of changes in