Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-13 Thread Daniel
A Williams wrote: Misak Khachatryan wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- Well, I have two Linux machines where Seamonkey crashes whenever I try and send a mail, I suspect I copied the profile from one to the other at some point. I

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread A Williams
Misak Khachatryan wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. The problem with an all-in-one browser+mail application is that if one component crashes then

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Jay Garcia
On 12.02.2012 08:54, Philip TAYLOR wrote: --- Original Message --- > > > Jay Garcia wrote: > >> With FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switch from one to the other. Or >> just click the one that is minimized to the task bar. ;-) > >>> With /ONLY/ FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switc

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Misak Khachatryan
Jay Garcia wrote: On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. The problem with an all-in-one browser+mail application is that if one component crashes then so does the other one.

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Jay Garcia wrote: With FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switch from one to the other. Or just click the one that is minimized to the task bar. ;-) With /ONLY/ FF and TB both running, ALT+TAB to switch from one to the other. but most people will have more than just two applications r

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Jay Garcia
On 12.02.2012 08:32, Philip TAYLOR wrote: --- Original Message --- > > > Misak Khachatryan wrote: > >> SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as >> one program. > > Don't really care about memory, but the last point is its sole raison > d'etre for me. > Ctrl+1 to

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
oppiman wrote: > ... Beauregard T. Shagnasty @ 2012-02-12 14:48 > >> Personally, I use Thunderbird and Firefox, and I'm stickin' with 'em. >> The wife is the SeaMonkey user on this computer -- so we each have our >> own set. > > You see, that is one thing I like about Chrome, the multiple > user/p

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Jay Garcia
On 12.02.2012 08:27, Misak Khachatryan wrote: --- Original Message --- > SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as > one program. The problem with an all-in-one browser+mail application is that if one component crashes then so does the other one. If the browser comp

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
... WLS @ 2012-02-12 15:33 > There is a multiple user/profile feature with Firefox, Thunderbird, and SeaMonkey. http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_manager Thanks, didn't know that. -- MJO ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozil

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Kertesz Laszlo
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:48:04 -0600 "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote: > oppiman wrote: > > > I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using > > Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of > > FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installin

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread WLS
On 02/12/2012 09:16 AM, oppiman wrote: > ... Beauregard T. Shagnasty @ 2012-02-12 14:48 > >> Whatever you do, don't uninstall Firefox. It is *always* good to have >> multiple browsers, for several reasons. > You are right. That's why I don't want to get rid of FF completely. > >> Possibly the odd a

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Philip TAYLOR
Misak Khachatryan wrote: SM uses less memory than FF+TB. And suite is more logical and feels as one program. Don't really care about memory, but the last point is its sole raison d'etre for me. Ctrl+1 to open browser, Ctrl+2 to open mail client. That's really all I want. Philip Taylor __

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Misak Khachatryan
oppiman wrote: Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loo

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Misak Khachatryan
oppiman wrote: Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loo

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
... WLS @ 2012-02-12 15:05 > As previously noted by BTS, you would lose some extension, and theme compatibility With SeaMonkey mail you would gain. 1. Mail always opening to the Inbox. 2. Unread, Total and Size Columns in the Folder Pane. 3. Right now, I can't think of the others. I haven't us

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
... Beauregard T. Shagnasty @ 2012-02-12 14:48 > Whatever you do, don't uninstall Firefox. It is *always* good to have multiple browsers, for several reasons. You are right. That's why I don't want to get rid of FF completely. Possibly the odd add-on/extension or toolbar where the developer ha

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread WLS
On 02/12/2012 07:56 AM, oppiman wrote: > Hello, > I've been using TB and FF for a long time. > Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me > But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. > So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF > with one to

Re: Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
oppiman wrote: > I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using > Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of > FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to > replace TB and FF with one tool. Whatever you do, don't uninst

Seamonkey instead of TB and FF

2012-02-12 Thread oppiman
Hello, I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to replace TB and FF with one tool. What functionality would I loose? What would