Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 20/03/2019 00:12:
Ant wrote:
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56 is
Gabriel wrote on 3/04/2019 7:58 PM:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 20/03/2019 00:12:
Ant wrote:
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to
get SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 20/03/2019 00:12:
Ant wrote:
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56 is
On 4/2/2019 12:27 AM, Daniel wrote:
...
I used NCSA Mosaic at first.
I've heard of 'Mosaic'!! ;-) BMT!!
BMT?
--
"We are closer to the ants than to butterflies. Very few people can
endure much leisure." --Gerald Brenan
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see
Daniel wrote on 31/03/2019 5:15 PM:
Daniel wrote on 30/03/2019 9:08 PM:
Daniel wrote on 24/03/2019 7:13 PM:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 10:42 PM:
Daniel wrote on 23/03/2019 04:15:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 2:42 AM:
I don't have plugins installed, but these extensions:
- duplicate this
Bob Fleischer wrote on 2/04/2019 6:41 AM:
Daniel wrote:
j...@comcast.com wrote on 30/03/2019 9:29 AM:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:28:54 -0700, Ant in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Ditto. I always loved the suite products, since Netscape days,
even though people think I am crazy!
I started
Daniel wrote:
j...@comcast.com wrote on 30/03/2019 9:29 AM:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:28:54 -0700, Ant in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Ditto. I always loved the suite products, since Netscape days,
even though people think I am crazy!
I started out on Netscape 3.0 -- Navigator
Remember
Daniel wrote on 30/03/2019 9:08 PM:
Daniel wrote on 24/03/2019 7:13 PM:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 10:42 PM:
Daniel wrote on 23/03/2019 04:15:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 2:42 AM:
I don't have plugins installed, but these extensions:
- duplicate this tab
- font finder
- instagram video
Daniel wrote on 24/03/2019 7:13 PM:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 10:42 PM:
Daniel wrote on 23/03/2019 04:15:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 2:42 AM:
I don't have plugins installed, but these extensions:
- duplicate this tab
- font finder
- instagram video download
- remove duplicate messages
j...@comcast.com wrote on 30/03/2019 9:29 AM:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:28:54 -0700, Ant in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Ditto. I always loved the suite products, since Netscape days,
even though people think I am crazy!
I started out on Netscape 3.0 -- Navigator
Remember when you would
On 3/29/2019 3:29 PM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:28:54 -0700, Ant in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Ditto. I always loved the suite products, since Netscape days, even
though people think I am crazy!
I started out on Netscape 3.0 -- Navigator
I think I started with
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:54:22 -0400, j...@comcast.com in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
>This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
>2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open -- including 4
>for the application FACEBOOK.
>
>It had frozen and was
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:28:54 -0700, Ant in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
>Ditto. I always loved the suite products, since Netscape days, even
>though people think I am crazy!
I started out on Netscape 3.0 -- Navigator
Remember when you would open the bookmarks file or Prefs.js of Seamonkey
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:13:54 +0100, Gabriel in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
>SM blocked many times a day.
>And this is on iMac 5K with 24GB of RAM!
You answered a major question of mine right here. More like a surmisal i
had that if i just got more RAM it would simply eat it in time.
I
Daniel wrote on 24/03/2019 7:13 PM:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 10:42 PM:
Daniel wrote on 23/03/2019 04:15:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 2:42 AM:
I don't have plugins installed, but these extensions: -
duplicate this tab - font finder - instagram video download -
remove duplicate messages
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 10:42 PM:
Daniel wrote on 23/03/2019 04:15:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 2:42 AM:
I don't have plugins installed, but these extensions:
- duplicate this tab
- font finder
- instagram video download
- remove duplicate messages
Hey, Gabriel, this extension,
Daniel wrote on 23/03/2019 04:15:
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 2:42 AM:
I don't have plugins installed, but these extensions:
- duplicate this tab
- font finder
- instagram video download
- remove duplicate messages
Hey, Gabriel, this extension, 'Remove Duplicate Messages' Does it
Gabriel wrote on 23/03/2019 2:42 AM:
I don't have plugins installed, but these extensions:
- duplicate this tab
- font finder
- instagram video download
- remove duplicate messages
Hey, Gabriel, this extension, 'Remove Duplicate Messages' Does it
remove duplicate messages on a
Basically yes. Also what Gabriel wrote about is multiprocess (e10s). Also not
Quantum and somewhat older. SeaMonkey does not implement it yet and if we
would do you can flush most classic extensions down the drain. Mozilla solved
it by killing all of them with 57 and go Web Extension.
FRG
On 3/22/2019 5:37 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 3/22/19 4:53 AM, Ant wrote:
On 3/21/2019 5:13 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Ant wrote on 17/03/2019 00:29:
On 3/16/2019 12:27 PM, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Ant via support-seamonkey a écrit :
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 21/03/2019 22:25:
> I'm going to try it on macOS, what should I be careful about with this 2.53
> release?
Nothing. Just have a profile backup ready in case you want to go back to 2.49.x.
I am using it daily on Windows and also tested on macOS.
Just be advised
On 3/22/19 4:53 AM, Ant wrote:
On 3/21/2019 5:13 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Ant wrote on 17/03/2019 00:29:
On 3/16/2019 12:27 PM, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Ant via support-seamonkey a écrit :
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken
On 3/21/2019 5:13 AM, Gabriel wrote:
Ant wrote on 17/03/2019 00:29:
On 3/16/2019 12:27 PM, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Ant via support-seamonkey a écrit :
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken
over
2.5 gig of memory and was
> I'm going to try it on macOS, what should I be careful about with this 2.53
> release?
Nothing. Just have a profile backup ready in case you want to go back to
2.49.x. I am using it daily on Windows and also tested on macOS.
Just be advised that it is 64 bit only (shouldn't be a problem) and
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 20/03/2019 00:12:
Ant wrote:
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56 is
Ant wrote on 17/03/2019 00:29:
On 3/16/2019 12:27 PM, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Ant via support-seamonkey a écrit :
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open --
Yes if it helps SeaMonkey! :/
On 3/20/2019 12:16 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
No :)
WaltS48 wrote:
Interested in the new Firefox rendering engine?--
"Caution is not cowardice; even the ants march armed." --Ugandan Proverb
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to
No :)
WaltS48 wrote:
Interested in the new Firefox rendering engine?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 3/19/19 4:28 PM, Ant wrote:
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get
SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56 is pretty close to 57 and not
On 3/19/2019 4:12 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get
SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56
Ant wrote:
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56 is pretty close to 57 and not that much
different
On 3/19/2019 12:41 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get
SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56 is pretty close to 57 and not that much
different from 60.
> No problems. I know the pain. It will take a while (years?) to get SeaMonkey
> onto the newer Gecko engines like Quantum to fix these issues. :(
There is no new Gecko engine. 56 is pretty close to 57 and not that much
different from 60. Quantum is more of a marketing gag.
There are always
On 3/19/2019 4:32 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 12:19:48 -0700, Ant in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Is there a way to make it use less memory? If so, what would it be?
No. Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. are the big memory and CPU hoggers in my
SeaMonkey usages especially
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 08:52:11 -0700, NFN Smith in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
>A couple of additional questions come to mind:
>
>- How much RAM do you have in your system, and how many other things do
>you have open? If you're operating on 4 GB, then Seamonkey is going to
>be taking most
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 12:19:48 -0700, Ant in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
>> Is there a way to make it use less memory? If so, what would it be?
>
>No. Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. are the big memory and CPU hoggers in my
>SeaMonkey usages especially with multiple tabs.
Thanks. I just
On 3/16/2019 12:27 PM, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Ant via support-seamonkey a écrit :
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open --
including 4
for the application
Ant via support-seamonkey a écrit :
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open --
including 4
for the application FACEBOOK.
It had frozen and was past the
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open -- including 4
for the application FACEBOOK.
It had frozen and was past the point of graceful shutdown though i might
j...@comcast.com wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:23:15 -0700, "David E. Ross"
in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open --
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:23:15 -0700, "David E. Ross"
in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
>On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
>> This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
>> 2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open -- including 4
>> for
On 3/15/2019 8:54 AM, j...@comcast.com wrote:
> This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
> 2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open -- including 4
> for the application FACEBOOK.
>
> It had frozen and was past the point of graceful shutdown
This morning, in less than 3 hours of running, Seamonkey had taken over
2.5 gig of memory and was climbing. About 8 tabs were open -- including 4
for the application FACEBOOK.
It had frozen and was past the point of graceful shutdown though i might
have been able to do that with about 30
43 matches
Mail list logo
