Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site whe
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would
suffice.
Up
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple
Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would
suffice.
Up
On 11-07-20 9:41 PM, Jim Dell wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would
suffice.
Upgrading also gets
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not
install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply
to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would
suffice.
Upgrading also gets the user off a security-vuln
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not
SeaM
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> John wrote:
>>
>>> I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
>>> account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
>>> supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not
>>> SeaMonkey?
>>
>>
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You wil
chokito wrote:
If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey
will fix it.http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
Yeas, because the user-agent will show as default both, FF and SM:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0
SeaMonkey/2.2
Only if you
> If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey
> will fix it.http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
>
Yeas, because the user-agent will show as default both, FF and SM:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0
SeaMonkey/2.2
___
On 11-07-19 11:38 AM, John wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of Se
Show here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530786
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
John wrote:
> I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
> account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
> supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You will need to add
"NOT Firefox/3.
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email
account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not
supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey?
John
--
Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam?
A: Post a message in any newsgro
16 matches
Mail list logo