Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Jim Dell wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site whe

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Jim Dell wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would suffice. Up

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Jim Dell wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Jim Dell wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would suffice. Up

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Chris Ilias
On 11-07-20 9:41 PM, Jim Dell wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Jim Dell
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would suffice. Upgrading also gets

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: I am aware of that, of course. Perhaps the user would rather not install a whole new and unfamiliar version of the entire suite, simply to gain access to a site where that "manual hack" (simple to do) would suffice. Upgrading also gets the user off a security-vuln

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-20 Thread Ray_Net
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: John wrote: I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaM

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> John wrote: >> >>> I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email >>> account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not >>> supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not >>> SeaMonkey? >> >>

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: John wrote: I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You wil

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread WLS
chokito wrote: If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey will fix it.http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ Yeas, because the user-agent will show as default both, FF and SM: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2 Only if you

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
> If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of SeaMonkey > will fix it.http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ > Yeas, because the user-agent will show as default both, FF and SM: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2 ___

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Chris Ilias
On 11-07-19 11:38 AM, John wrote: I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? If I understand correctly, upgrading to the latest version of Se

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread chokito
Show here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530786 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
John wrote: > I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email > account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not > supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? Yahoo is clueless with their browser sniffer. You will need to add "NOT Firefox/3.

Yahoo! e-mail problem

2011-07-19 Thread John
I'm running SeaMonkey v2.0.14. I tried to upgrade my Yahoo! email account to their new system, but it tells me my browser is not supported. Firefox 3 and newer are supported, so why not SeaMonkey? John -- Q: What's the quickest way to get a mailbox full of spam? A: Post a message in any newsgro