Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
> I don't have the answer myself. You may find a better option than
> unpacking and repacking omni.ja, here:
> http://mike.kaply.com/2013/05/06/dont-unpack-and-repack-omni-jar/
Ok I asked him. Let's see.
___
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 03:46:19 -0500, Rob wrote:
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
The 'dim' effect is produced by a CSS file messageBody.css inside
omni.ja. The file omni.ja is in the program directory.
Yes I found that, that is how I knew what the attribute is that
fouls things up.
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 02:58:54 -0500, Rob wrote:
>> Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> To control the signature display, follow the instructions at
>>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Signature_display_color
>>
>> Thanks, that is the article disc
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 02:58:54 -0500, Rob wrote:
> Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> To control the signature display, follow the instructions at
>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Signature_display_color
>
> Thanks, that is the article discussing the problem I have.
>
> Unfortunately it onl
Trane Francks wrote:
> On 8/10/13 4:58 PM +0900, Rob wrote:
>> Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> To control the signature display, follow the instructions at
>>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Signature_display_color
>>
>> Thanks, that is the article discussing the problem I have.
>>
>>
On 8/10/13 4:58 PM +0900, Rob wrote:
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
To control the signature display, follow the instructions at
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Signature_display_color
Thanks, that is the article discussing the problem I have.
Unfortunately it only discusses a solutio
On 8/10/13 4:57 PM +0900, Rob wrote:
But I am discussing HTML mail all the time.
We don't use any text mail anymore. For at least a decade.
So my message explicitly mentions "HTML mail".
Yes, Rob, we know. A tangent was taken to discuss sig stripping and how
the grey was used to indicate th
Chris Ilias wrote:
> On 2013-08-09 5:00 AM, Rob wrote:
>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
>> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
>> has changed now in 2.20
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:37:10 -0500, Rob wrote:
>> Rick Merrill wrote:
>>> Rob wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "d
Trane Francks wrote:
> On 8/10/13 12:57 AM +0900, Rob wrote:
>> David E. Ross wrote:
>
>>> The gray (dim) signature indicates it will be stripped away in replies
>>> and forwards.
>>
>> No, this does not happen.
>> I also don't see a UI to control this.
>
> Maybe not with HTML mail, but it certai
On 8/10/13 6:06 AM +0900, Chris Ilias wrote:
On 2013-08-09 5:00 AM, Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has change
On 2013-08-09 5:00 AM, Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier release after 2
On 8/10/13 12:57 AM +0900, Rob wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
The gray (dim) signature indicates it will be stripped away in replies
and forwards.
No, this does not happen.
I also don't see a UI to control this.
Maybe not with HTML mail, but it certainly does in plain text. I tried
with Dav
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:37:10 -0500, Rob wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Rob wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail,
Rick Merrill wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> Rick Merrill wrote:
>>> Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
Rob wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier rele
Rick Merrill wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
>> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
>> has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier relea
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Trane Francks wrote:
>> On 8/10/13 6:27 AM +0900, Daniel wrote:
>>> Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text m
Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier release after 2.14.1)
I see no UI to
I just wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/10/13 6:27 AM +0900, Daniel wrote:
Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
h
Trane Francks wrote:
On 8/10/13 6:27 AM +0900, Daniel wrote:
Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has changed now
David E. Ross wrote:
> On 8/9/13 2:00 AM, Rob wrote:
>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
>> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
>> has changed now in 2.20 or
On 8/9/13 2:00 AM, Rob wrote:
> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
> has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier release after
Rob wrote:
> Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> Daniel:
>>>Rob wrote:
>>
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has chan
Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Daniel:
>>Rob wrote:
>
>>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
>>> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
>>> has changed now in 2.20 or in
Daniel wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
>> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
>> has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier release aft
Trane Francks wrote:
> On 8/10/13 6:27 AM +0900, Daniel wrote:
>> Rob wrote:
>>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
>>> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
>>
On 8/10/13 6:27 AM +0900, Daniel wrote:
Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has changed now in 2.20 or in an earli
Daniel:
>Rob wrote:
>> I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
>> noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
>> (this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
>> has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier release after 2.14
Rob wrote:
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier release after 2.14.1)
Rob, as far as
I installed 2.20 on a system at work where we still use 2.14.1 and
noticed that signatures are now displayed "dim" in HTML mail as well.
(this used to be the case only in text mail, but I don't know if this
has changed now in 2.20 or in an earlier release after 2.14.1)
I see no UI to control this.
31 matches
Mail list logo
