Fons
the icosahedron (faces) does not provide a uniform spherical sampling in the
sense that the spherical harmonics are orthogonal (well spotted Dave!).
If you look for example at my thesis p. 167 you can observe that with such
distribution the 3rd order (sampled) spherical harmonics are not or
Sampo Syreeni wrote
but the real treat is the companion document at
http://wiki.xiph.org/Channel_mapping_examples where I mapped just about
every format in existence to what we came up with in channel semantics.
Do take a look at it and disseminate the work if right.
Well it looks "right to me"
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:20:40AM +0200, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> On 2010-11-04, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
>
> >But it should have been clear that the context was testing some
> >code supposed to produce a max-rE decode but failing to do so. The
> >question then is why not - is the code buggy or
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> On 2010-11-04, Peter Lennox wrote:
>> I've no idea what you're talking about, but then I've no idea what my wife
>> means when she explains why this red is better than that one, [...]
>
> It takes a gay man to figure out precise colors, or a w
On 2010-11-04, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
But it should have been clear that the context was testing some code
supposed to produce a max-rE decode but failing to do so. The question
then is why not - is the code buggy or are my expectations wrong (it
turned out to be the last).
And my tenta
On 2010-11-04, Peter Lennox wrote:
I love it when you egg-heads start talking dirty.
It's only dirty once you invoke the axiom of choice or somesuch vile
notion: http://xkcd.com/804/ . Apparently they now also have a site to
explain it: http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/10/11/pumpkin-carving/
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:36:21PM +0200, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> On 2010-11-04, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
>
> >Seems you are completely out of touch with the context of this thread.
>
> That more than possible. But still, if you don't mind my asking, why
> be so harsh about it, all of a sudden
I love it when you egg-heads start talking dirty.
I've no idea what you're talking about, but then I've no idea what my wife
means when she explains why this red is better than that one, nor when my son
explains how the design of a differential could be better designed for
off-roading, nor when
On 2010-11-04, d...@york.ac.uk wrote:
The interesting thing is, if I interpreted your earlier emails right,
that having _some_ portion of 3rd order is better than having none at
all.
Well, of course. Take for instance the 5.0 ITU setup, and try to imagine
*not* how you would approach it from
On 2010-11-04, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Seems you are completely out of touch with the context of this thread.
That more than possible. But still, if you don't mind my asking, why be
so harsh about it, all of a sudden?
There's nothing 'naïve' about in-phase. It may look as something
fun
On Nov 4 2010, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
it turns out that the 3rd
degree spherical harmonics are neither normalised nor orthogonal
when summed over the set of directions corresponding to the faces
of an icosahedron (but lower degrees are). This is confirmed by
the set of singular values obtai
11 matches
Mail list logo
