Hi Eric,
> Thanks for the info regarding Ardour. Although I’m not an application
> developer (nor aspire to be), I have used Python. Not too long back,
> I purchased some sensors from Phidget to make a response box. I also
> built a few gadgets based on the Arduino microcontroller, and Python
> co
as well as future hearing experiment(s).
Kind regards,
Eric C.
PS—Maybe I should have titled this (Adriaensen, Ardour, Arduino,
Ambisonics)?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120
5.62 MB]
(This study was kindly rejected by JASA, but it’s still in progress.)
Kind regards,
Eric C.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120113/c498bca
part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120113/c498bcad/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
ircam.fr/filez/download.php?ad=239605ZfpX
>>
>> I do interpolate separately the excess phase part and the magnitude
>> spectrum, rather than resampling the HRIR.
>>
>>
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
&g
Peter Lennox wrote:
...
> On the question of publishing but not preaching to the converted, one could
> see that some kind of peer review might help.
> I'm thinking that specialised publishing from leaders in the field, but
> pitching at the early-undergrad /bright-and-interested 6th former (in th
> http://echanges.ircam.fr/filez/download.php?ad=239605ZfpX
>
> I do interpolate separately the excess phase part and the magnitude spectrum,
> rather than resampling the HRIR.
>
>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
&
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:04:22PM +, Dave Malham wrote:
> Is there a specific technical reason for doing it that way, or is it
> just more convenient?
I can't see any reason. The 44.1 kHz samples are just one representation
of a continuous waveform, the 48.0 kHz samples another. There is no
ing the HRIR.
>
>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120113/6ec6fbd6/attachment.html
> >
> ___
> Sursound
crubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120113/6ec6fbd6/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Hi,
As I've remarked in the past, I find the vast majority of binaural stuff has all the images
behind the head for me, unless head tracking is implemented. From talking to people, this appears to
be a less common response than hearing stuff in-head, but I don't know if there's any research to
> Just turning things over in the back of my mind.
> Eric was pointing out that, without the peer review that goes with
> publication in a prestigious journal, a paper isn't taken seriously. as
> Robert points out, peer review offers at least some assurance that a paper
> does not contain 'junk inf
Just turning things over in the back of my mind.
Eric was pointing out that, without the peer review that goes with publication
in a prestigious journal, a paper isn't taken seriously. as Robert points out,
peer review offers at least some assurance that a paper does not contain 'junk
informatio
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:52:14PM -0500, Hector Centeno wrote:
> Thank you Fons for your comments. What parameters did use for zita-bls1? The
> default ones?
Yes. As to everything appearing in the back that's probably
just me...
> I guess I could use a different HRTF measurement to avoid
> th
14 matches
Mail list logo
