On 07/04/2012 06:40 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano a écrit :
Yum has gotten much faster recently, but I have no idea how it
compares with apt today. IMHO it is as easy to use as apt (ie: it is
functionally equivalent), but it may be slow (perhaps to the point of
being unusable
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano a écrit :
> Yum has gotten much faster recently, but I have no idea how it
> compares with apt today. IMHO it is as easy to use as apt (ie: it is
> functionally equivalent), but it may be slow (perhaps to the point of
> being unusable?) on low end systems. I should give it
On 07/04/2012 04:28 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Here's a few benchmarks to compare YUM with APT:
http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7382/
BTW, thanks for the link!
-- Fernando
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/lis
Hi Marc,
On 07/04/2012 04:28 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
I know from experience that .deb based distributions are easier to
use than .rpm distributions, especially on slow computers (like the XO
or the Raspberry Pi).
I was merely pointing out that you were comparing apt with rpm, which
was not
I stopped using RedHat (before Fedora) in favour of Debian, to get out
of the RPM "dependency hell". At the time, there was no YUM to resolve
the package dependencies, like APT does so well. But I remember my
experience with YUM on the XO computer (from the OLPC project); it was
was extremely slow.
On 07/04/2012 01:44 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
[MUNCH]...
But I much prefer Debian based distributions (like
Ubuntu) for their APT packaging system (instead of RPM on Fedora based
distributions).
Caveat (apt != rpm):
underlying package system: .deb packages in Debian, .rpm packages in Fedora
dep
I use the KXStudio distribution based on the latest Ubuntu 12.04
LTS (Long Term Support). Two installation methods are proposed with a
live-dvd (easiest) or a small netboot iso (prefered). It's also
possible to use the kxstudio packages with a normal Ubuntu (my method).
http://kxstudio.sourceforge
I can second the recommendation for Planet CCRMA. I've used it for
for audio work for a decade (since Red Hat 7 days) on various mini-ITX
based systems and laptops. 'Nando Lopez-Lezcano (the maintainer) and
others on the mailing list are helpful and quick to reply.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:51 A
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:19:05PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 06:51 PM, Eric Benjamin wrote:
> >I have almost no experience in this, but it seems like this discussion would
> >be
> >incomplete without mentioning the Planet CCRMA distribution:
> >
> >http://ccrma.stanford.edu/
On 07/04/2012 06:51 PM, Eric Benjamin wrote:
I have almost no experience in this, but it seems like this discussion would be
incomplete without mentioning the Planet CCRMA distribution:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/
speak of the devil :) hi nando. nice to see you on sursound!
On 07/04/2012 03:41 AM, Dave Malham wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm looking for recommendations on a preferred (small) Linux distro for
surround work. To start with, I'd like to run on a Asus 35 M1-M Pro
motherboard as I have one handy. Unfortunately, my current Ubuntu distro
seems to have difficulties pick
I have almost no experience in this, but it seems like this discussion would be
incomplete without mentioning the Planet CCRMA distribution:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/
written with too much blood in my caffeine stream.
Eric
- Original Message
From: Dave Malham
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:41:53AM +0100, Dave Malham wrote:
>I'm looking for recommendations on a preferred (small) Linux
> distro for surround work. To start with, I'd like to run on a Asus
> 35 M1-M Pro motherboard as I have one handy. Unfortunately, my
> current Ubuntu distro seems to have
gt; __**_
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.mus
> ic.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was s
*
> **/
>
> __**_
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.mus
> ic.vt.edu/mailma
l.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120704/3b4ec3b6/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Avlinux , not so small but good for Audio http://www.bandshed.net/AVLinux.html
i use this one.
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/PuppyStudio small good but abit old ( 2011 ) but
probably good enough, or http://gorgeaccess.net/fatdaw/ relation to
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/fatdog including audacity
M
Hi folks,
I'm looking for recommendations on a preferred (small) Linux distro for surround work. To start
with, I'd like to run on a Asus 35 M1-M Pro motherboard as I have one handy. Unfortunately, my
current Ubuntu distro seems to have difficulties picking up its built-in 8 channel audio but
18 matches
Mail list logo
