Re: [Sursound] Linux ambdec b-format channel order

2013-11-16 Thread Marc Lavallée
I meant a patched ambdec... Also, A patched mplayer would be better, as you prescribe. Another limitation of mplayer is the number of output channels, which I think is limited to 8 (to be verified). -- Marc Fons Adriaensen a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 05:35:31PM -0500, Marc Lavallée wrot

Re: [Sursound] Linux ambdec b-format channel order

2013-11-16 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 05:35:31PM -0500, Marc Lavallée wrote: > I would be happy to use a patched version of mplayer *and* a > patched version of jackd; is the patch for jackd still available (and > compatible with jackd2)? Don't know if they are still available. But if implemented in Jack they

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic first approach

2013-11-16 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 05:12:32PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > you are right, i should have phrased that more precisely, the > connectors are actually fine, or at least not the biggest problem. > > the _cables_ are frightfully flimsy (which is a consequence of the > small size of the 6-pin

Re: [Sursound] Linux ambdec b-format channel order

2013-11-16 Thread Marc Lavallée
Hi Fons I would be happy to use a patched version of mplayer *and* a patched version of jackd; is the patch for jackd still available (and compatible with jackd2)? -- Marc Fons Adriaensen a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:38:09AM -0800, Aaron Heller wrote: > > > I encountered this a while

Re: [Sursound] Linux ambdec b-format channel order

2013-11-16 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:38:09AM -0800, Aaron Heller wrote: > I encountered this a while back and modified my copy of Ambdec 0.5.1 to > register its inputs with jack in FuMa order rather than ACN, specifically > to get the mplayer-jack-ambdec chain to work as expected (which I suspect > is one o

Re: [Sursound] Linux ambdec b-format channel order

2013-11-16 Thread Aaron Heller
_ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131116/76969c53/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic first approach

2013-11-16 Thread David Pickett
At 10:03 16-11-13, Paul Hodges wrote: >--On 16 November 2013 06:31 + Michael Chapman >wrote: > >> --fiddling to get the correct one of (?)24 possible permutations of >> the four capsules to the snake is a ! Especially in dim lighting >> ... and you didn't bring a lamp ... and ... > >A da

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic first approach

2013-11-16 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 11/15/2013 07:23 PM, Len Moskowitz wrote: J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote: the tetra sounds great, but the connectors are very flimsy. The connectors are all from Switchcraft's Tini-Q (mini-XLR) series, used in many professional products and contexts. In the six years since TetraMic was introd

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic first approach

2013-11-16 Thread Paul Hodges
--On 16 November 2013 06:31 + Michael Chapman wrote: > --fiddling to get the correct one of (?)24 possible permutations of > the four capsules to the snake is a ! Especially in dim lighting > ... and you didn't bring a lamp ... and ... A dab of four coloured paints on the plugs and sock