Marc Lavallée wrote:
Hi Stefan.
With two subs, I would place them at front-left and front-right,
and I would decode to frontal stereo.
For horizontal-only, Ambisonics requires at least 3 speakers.
In both cases, there could be some directional cues, but only for
frequencies a bit higher t
Steven Boardman wrote:
If there is an LFE sub in a playback system, that also has full range
satellites,. Why not use it? Music playback on these systems can still use the
full range, but also use the sub for dynamic effect. Particularly when it is
dialled low. It allows the program material
Hi Stefan.
With two subs, I would place them at front-left and front-right,
and I would decode to frontal stereo.
For horizontal-only, Ambisonics requires at least 3 speakers.
In both cases, there could be some directional cues, but only for
frequencies a bit higher than the Schroeder frequenc
Marc Lavallée wrote:
Hi Jörn.
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:50:53 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
frankly, i'm waiting for some well-funded ambisonics wizarding school
to go one step further and start building a mixed-order three-way
system with a few subs, a few more midrange enclosures and many
o on.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150419/fcf1883a/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail
If there is an LFE sub in a playback system, that also has full range
satellites,. Why not use it? Music playback on these systems can still use the
full range, but also use the sub for dynamic effect. Particularly when it is
dialled low. It allows the program material to be louder, as one is u
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 04/19/2015 07:29 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Otherwise we don't need any sub, and Jörn and Marc could save some
money...:-)
the saving money part happens when you stop pushing every single
loudspeaker down to 20 hz (because extended lf capability equals siz
Hi Jörn.
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:50:53 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> frankly, i'm waiting for some well-funded ambisonics wizarding school
> to go one step further and start building a mixed-order three-way
> system with a few subs, a few more midrange enclosures and many, many
> small hf unit
The ICSA (International Conference on Spatial Audio) Reminder:
The extended deadline for abstract submission (papers/workshops) will
be next week, Sunday April 26th 2015, and it is happily waiting for even
more submissions :-)
http://icsa2015.iem.at
Best regards
Franz
...next stop: ICSA's A
Eero Aro wrote:
...
> There was a thread about recognizing UHJ encoding some time ago,
> can't remember when. Must have been years...
November 2013. The Subject for the thread
was "UHJ disc discovery?"
A quick scan of the content suggests that the
Web page you cited:
http://kokkinizita.linuxaudi
man/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150419/fcf1883a/attachment.html>
_
On 04/19/2015 07:29 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Otherwise we don't need any sub, and Jörn and Marc could save some
money...:-)
the saving money part happens when you stop pushing every single
loudspeaker down to 20 hz (because extended lf capability equals size
and weight and money, and
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 04/11/2015 06:45 PM, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
So a serious question: For which reason (if any) would you need 28
speakers, which is a speaker count above 22.2? (could also be used to
reproduce TOA, and is an established format for film audio )
can't commen
Hi Stefan.
I use an equilateral triangle of subs for a few reasons:
- I use small satellite speakers with a 125Hz cut-off frequency,
so I can hear some directional cues from the subs, around 125Hz;
the subs are on a small circle (radius=1.2m), which helps.
- The left and right subs are also fo
Marc Lavallée wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:15:46 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
can't comment on the 28, but .4 is very very nice indeed.
i just built a third-order horizontal system for LAC 2015 with only
two subwoofers, and it took a lot of tweaking to hide all the wrong
localisation
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150419/d8d2c052/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsub
Hi Marc
Software, VST plugins. My favourite and possibly the one with the best
graphic resolution and display is The Flux Stereo Tool:
http://www.fluxhome.com/products/freewares/stereotool-v3
There was a thread about recognizing UHJ encoding some time ago,
can't remember when. Must have been yea
ment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20150419/272b54ca/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
Hi Eero.
Your method is similar to what Fons explained here:
http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/ambisonics/uhjtest/
Fons is using his own software, while you are using a goniometer.
Is your goniometer part of a UHJ decoding hardware, or software?
It would be nice to have a common method to detect
Hi All
I don't have an UHJ decoder hooked up at the moment, but by listening to
Flower of Life in stereo and looking at the goniometer I must say that this
recording is not UHJ encoded.
There is a lot of content with large phase differences. Those will decode
to the rear part of the soundfield w
Please contact Mike Williams at m...@soundsscot.com
I can tell you the whole story behind these two references.
Mike
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account
21 matches
Mail list logo
