Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

2023-11-03 Thread Steven Boardman
; them. > > > Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com) > Core Sound LLC > www.core-sound.com > Home of OctoMic and TetraMic > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

2023-11-03 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 12:34:52PM +, Jack Reynolds wrote: > I think the point here is we tested at two different pre-amps > gains, to eliminate that as a potential source of noise. > There was no difference in SNR, indicating the noise is generated > by the capsules and electronics, and not t

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

2023-11-03 Thread lenmoskowitz
Steven Boardman wrote: One doesn't need too, they are exposed. Pretty sure they are Transound https://www.jlielectronics.com/transound/tsb-120ao I'm sure Len will correct me if wrong. "Pretty sure" is not the same as "I'm certain because the manufacturer told me." We don't discuss our cap

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

2023-11-03 Thread David Stalling
_ > > Sursound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > > > -- next part -- > An H

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

2023-11-03 Thread Steven Boardman
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20231103/8d05b3a2/attachment.htm> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

2023-11-03 Thread Ralf R Radermacher
Am 03.11.23 um 13:34 schrieb Jack Reynolds: Thanks Mark. I think the point here is we tested at two different pre-amps gains, to eliminate that as a potential source of noise. There was no difference in SNR, indicating the noise is generated by the capsules and electronics, and not the preamp

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

2023-11-03 Thread Jack Reynolds
Thanks Mark. I think the point here is we tested at two different pre-amps gains, to eliminate that as a potential source of noise. There was no difference in SNR, indicating the noise is generated by the capsules and electronics, and not the preamp. Cheers Jack Sent from my iPhone > On