On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:17:47PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:00:43PM -0500, I wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> >
> > > So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do "mkswap" on the swap
> > > partition before putting the disk int
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 23:34, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > > On the other hand, a stopped process might be waiting for a signal that
> > > > can be sent by an unfreezable process -- and the stopped process might
> > > > be
> > > > holding a lo
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On the other hand, a stopped process might be waiting for a signal that
> > > can be sent by an unfreezable process -- and the stopped process might be
> > > holding a lock which is needed by some other unfreezable process, so you
> > > need t
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:00:43PM -0500, I wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> > So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do "mkswap" on the swap
> > partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
>
> Ugh, no it's not. You really want the
I hope, this is what you need:
l158dio:~ # s2ram -i
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Acer"
sys_product = "TravelMate 2410"
sys_version = "0100 "
bios_version = "V1.04 "
See /usr/src/linux/Doc*/power/video.txt for details,
then reimplement neccessary
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 16:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 01:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > I do not like the counting idea; it should be simpler to just check
> > > > > > if
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 15:00 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> Ugh, no it's not. You really want the UUID on the swap area to remain
> the same.
Why?
[not questioning your reasoning, this is coming from someone who knows
very little about swap structure and what the UUID is used for]
Daniel
---
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:00:43PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> > So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do "mkswap" on the swap
> > partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
>
> Ugh, no it's not. You reall
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 17:37 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> So it is a good idea to tell the engineer to do "mkswap" on the swap
> partition before putting the disk into the replacement hardware.
Ugh, no it's not. You really want the UUID on the swap area to remain
the same.
--
Peter
-
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 17:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 16:43, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > In fact, I really mean that if we want a process to go to the
> > > refrigerator, we
> > > have to set PF_FREEZE for i
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:09:33PM +0100, Roberto Oppedisano wrote:
> Hi there!
> As you can see to make s2ram work I only need to use "-sf" arg.
Ok.
> Kind regards
> Roberto
>
> poppero1:~# s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
>sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard "
>sys_product =
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 16:43, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > In fact, I really mean that if we want a process to go to the refrigerator,
> > we
> > have to set PF_FREEZE for it (otherwise try_to_freeze() won't do anytning).
> > Thus because we want
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> In fact, I really mean that if we want a process to go to the refrigerator, we
> have to set PF_FREEZE for it (otherwise try_to_freeze() won't do anytning).
> Thus because we want stopped processes to go to the refrigerator once they
> have received
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 13:53, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:53:56AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > So by checking errno we can distinguish 'to old
> > kernel' from 'real error'?
>
> Yes, i think so. I have not checked all the possible cases where the
> error return
Hi,
On Thursday, 30 November 2006 01:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > I do not like the counting idea; it should be simpler to just check if
> > > > > all the processes are still stopped.
> > > >
> > > > I thought about
Op Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:53:46 +0100
schreef Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > BTW, what is the first kernel with the correct code? It's not in
> > 2.16.18, is it? Ah, I see they just released 2.6.19, is it in there?
>
> I think it is (i pushed it through Andrew), but i have not checked it.
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 10:31:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > HPC nx6325. Someone has reported he's managed to get s2ram working on it,
> > but it looks like his machine is slightly different to this one ...
>
> Is there some way to identify your model? Can you post s2ram strings?
> Ste
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:53:56AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> So by checking errno we can distinguish 'to old
> kernel' from 'real error'?
Yes, i think so. I have not checked all the possible cases where the
error return value is set, but i think it cannot return -ENOTTY other
than for this ca
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2006-11-30 00:51:06, Gilles Grandou wrote:
>> lspci -v
>> [...]
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility
>> Radeon 9600 M10] (prog-if 00 [VGA])
>>
>> using radeon xorg server.
>
> And no binary modules, right?
right ;)
Gilles.
-
Op Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:11:09 +0100
schreef Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 10:16:12PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:09:02 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Wednesday, 29 November 2006 11:59, Tim Dijk
20 matches
Mail list logo
