On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:29:50 +0600, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> s2ram works OK with just -f on my laptop:
>> sys_vendor = "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."
>> sys_product = "R40/R41"
>> sys_version = "02YA"
>> bios_version = "02YA"
>>
>> Please include it in the
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:58:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As indicated in a recent thread on Linux-PM, it's necessary to call
> pm_ops->finish() before devce_resume(), but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be
> called before pm_ops->finish()
> (cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermai
Hi,
(taking suspend-devel into cc: )
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 09:01:08PM +0600, Alexey Feldgendler wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> s2ram works OK with just -f on my laptop:
> sys_vendor = "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."
> sys_product = "R40/R41"
> sys_version = "02YA"
> bios_version = "02
Hi,
(adding the suspend-devel list to cc: to get your findings into the mail
archive :-)
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 08:00:55PM -0500, Allen wrote:
> sys_vendor = "Dell Computer Corporation"
> sys_product = "Dimension 3000 "
> sys_version = ""
> bios_version = "A02"
Is that a deskt
Hi,
(taking suspend-devel into cc:)
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:39:47PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> hi.
>
> i found that my hp-pavilion notebook is not in the s2ram whitelist.
>
> umlautg:/home/zmoelnig# s2ram -i
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:13:08PM +0100, Miroslav Ruda wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:33:58PM +0100, Frank Ursel wrote:
> > Before i actually suspend the notebook, i write some data about the
> > graphic card on disk and on resume the data is written back to the
> > graphic card and everythin
Hi Miroslav,
i'm taking suspend-devel into cc:, maybe somebody there has an idea about
this, too.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:18:31PM +0100, Miroslav Ruda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing opensuse 10.2 on Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook 7110 (intel
> dual core, intel 965 chipset, intel 945 graphics chip
Hi,
i'm taking suspend-devel into cc:, so you'll probably get a faster
turnaround time for the next mails :-)
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:23:24PM -0500, Mike Farrell wrote:
> Hello seife,
>
> I'm having trouble getting my laptop to suspend (even under the most
> minimal environment with init=/bin
Hi,
(suspend-devel added to cc: to get the message into the archive :-)
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:59:15AM +0100, Johannes Engel wrote:
> Stefan Seyfried schrieb:
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:48PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>
> >>> Machine is unknown.
> >>> This
Hi,
i'm taking suspend-devel into cc: to make your results available to a broader
audience :-)
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:12:01PM -0300, Manuel Jander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried s2ram on my laptop. It was not known to the program, but worked
> using the -f switch.
> No other workaround was re
Hi,
i'm taking suspend-devel into cc: to present your results to a wider audience
:-)
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:20:21AM +0100, Yaroslav Latyshev wrote:
>
> FYI (addition to the whitelist):
>
> "s2ram -s -f" works fine (in X11) on:
>
> sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation"
> sys_product =
It's hardly desirable to introduce the neurotic loop of thought presented here
into the reified environment of a media obsessed with the means of its own
production and maintenance. ' 'Well its not quite. DealofDay: Fetching
fairfieldresorts. in short there's very little to balance.
No purchas
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Acer"
sys_product = "TravelMate 4200 "
sys_version = "V1.60"
bios_version = "V1.60"
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300 - Nvidia driver 1.0-9631
OpenSuse 10.2
The system suspends after booting with the option
init=/bin/bash, but
Change the ordering of code in kernel/power/main.c so that device_suspend()
is called before disable_nonboot_cpus() and pm_ops->finish() is called after
enable_nonboot_cpus() and before device_resume(), as indicated by recent
discussion on Linux-PM
(cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006
Hi,
As indicated in a recent thread on Linux-PM, it's necessary to call
pm_ops->finish() before devce_resume(), but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be
called before pm_ops->finish()
(cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006-November/004164.html).
For consistency, it seems reasonable to call
Make the userland interface of swsusp call pm_ops->finish() after
enable_nonboot_cpus() and before resume_device(),
as indicated by the recent discussion on Linux-PM
(cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006-November/004164.html).
This patch changes the SNAPSHOT_PMOPS ioctl so that its fi
Change the ordering of code in kernel/power/disk.c so that
device_suspend() is called before disable_nonboot_cpus() and
platform_finish() is called after enable_nonboot_cpus() and before
device_resume(), as indicated by the recent discussion on Linux-PM
(cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm
Change the ordering of code in kernel/power/user.c so that device_suspend()
is called before disable_nonboot_cpus() and device_resume() is called after
enable_nonboot_cpus(). This is needed to make the userland suspend call
pm_ops->finish() after enable_nonboot_cpus() and before device_resume(),
a
18 matches
Mail list logo