Re: [Suspend-devel] A new whitelist item for s2ram

2006-12-17 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:29:50 +0600, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> s2ram works OK with just -f on my laptop: >> sys_vendor = "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD." >> sys_product = "R40/R41" >> sys_version = "02YA" >> bios_version = "02YA" >> >> Please include it in the

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH -mm] PM: Change ordering of suspend and resume code

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:58:15PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > As indicated in a recent thread on Linux-PM, it's necessary to call > pm_ops->finish() before devce_resume(), but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be > called before pm_ops->finish() > (cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermai

Re: [Suspend-devel] A new whitelist item for s2ram

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, (taking suspend-devel into cc: ) On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 09:01:08PM +0600, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > > Hi! > > s2ram works OK with just -f on my laptop: > sys_vendor = "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD." > sys_product = "R40/R41" > sys_version = "02YA" > bios_version = "02

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram whitelist entry

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, (adding the suspend-devel list to cc: to get your findings into the mail archive :-) On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 08:00:55PM -0500, Allen wrote: > sys_vendor = "Dell Computer Corporation" > sys_product = "Dimension 3000 " > sys_version = "" > bios_version = "A02" Is that a deskt

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram whitelist

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, (taking suspend-devel into cc:) On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:39:47PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > hi. > > i found that my hp-pavilion notebook is not in the s2ram whitelist. > > umlautg:/home/zmoelnig# s2ram -i > This machine can be identified by: > sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend to RAM on lifebook 7110

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:13:08PM +0100, Miroslav Ruda wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:33:58PM +0100, Frank Ursel wrote: > > Before i actually suspend the notebook, i write some data about the > > graphic card on disk and on resume the data is written back to the > > graphic card and everythin

Re: [Suspend-devel] suspend to RAM on lifebook 7110

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi Miroslav, i'm taking suspend-devel into cc:, maybe somebody there has an idea about this, too. On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:18:31PM +0100, Miroslav Ruda wrote: > Hi, > > I'm installing opensuse 10.2 on Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook 7110 (intel > dual core, intel 965 chipset, intel 945 graphics chip

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, i'm taking suspend-devel into cc:, so you'll probably get a faster turnaround time for the next mails :-) On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:23:24PM -0500, Mike Farrell wrote: > Hello seife, > > I'm having trouble getting my laptop to suspend (even under the most > minimal environment with init=/bin

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram Dell Latitude D820

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, (suspend-devel added to cc: to get the message into the archive :-) On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:59:15AM +0100, Johannes Engel wrote: > Stefan Seyfried schrieb: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:55:48PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> > >>> Machine is unknown. > >>> This

Re: [Suspend-devel] Software Suspend. Works succesful on Dell Lattitude CPx650GT

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, i'm taking suspend-devel into cc: to make your results available to a broader audience :-) On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:12:01PM -0300, Manuel Jander wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried s2ram on my laptop. It was not known to the program, but worked > using the -f switch. > No other workaround was re

Re: [Suspend-devel] s2ram : Candidate for the whitelist

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi, i'm taking suspend-devel into cc: to present your results to a wider audience :-) On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:20:21AM +0100, Yaroslav Latyshev wrote: > > FYI (addition to the whitelist): > > "s2ram -s -f" works fine (in X11) on: > > sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation" > sys_product =

[Suspend-devel] DealofDay: Fetching Ford.

2006-12-17 Thread Collins Sally
It's hardly desirable to introduce the neurotic loop of thought presented here into the reified environment of a media obsessed with the means of its own production and maintenance. ' 'Well its not quite. DealofDay: Fetching fairfieldresorts. in short there's very little to balance. No purchas

[Suspend-devel] s2ram Acer TravelMate 4200

2006-12-17 Thread Axel
This machine can be identified by: sys_vendor = "Acer" sys_product = "TravelMate 4200 " sys_version = "V1.60" bios_version = "V1.60" Nvidia GeForce Go 7300 - Nvidia driver 1.0-9631 OpenSuse 10.2 The system suspends after booting with the option init=/bin/bash, but

[Suspend-devel] [PATCH -mm 1/4] PM: Change code ordering in main.c

2006-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Change the ordering of code in kernel/power/main.c so that device_suspend() is called before disable_nonboot_cpus() and pm_ops->finish() is called after enable_nonboot_cpus() and before device_resume(), as indicated by recent discussion on Linux-PM (cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006

[Suspend-devel] [PATCH -mm] PM: Change ordering of suspend and resume code

2006-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, As indicated in a recent thread on Linux-PM, it's necessary to call pm_ops->finish() before devce_resume(), but enable_nonboot_cpus() has to be called before pm_ops->finish() (cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006-November/004164.html). For consistency, it seems reasonable to call

[Suspend-devel] [PATCH -mm 4/4] swsusp: Change pm_ops handling by userland interface

2006-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Make the userland interface of swsusp call pm_ops->finish() after enable_nonboot_cpus() and before resume_device(), as indicated by the recent discussion on Linux-PM (cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2006-November/004164.html). This patch changes the SNAPSHOT_PMOPS ioctl so that its fi

[Suspend-devel] [PATCH -mm 2/4] swsusp: Change code ordering in disk.c

2006-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Change the ordering of code in kernel/power/disk.c so that device_suspend() is called before disable_nonboot_cpus() and platform_finish() is called after enable_nonboot_cpus() and before device_resume(), as indicated by the recent discussion on Linux-PM (cf. http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm

[Suspend-devel] [PATCH -mm 3/4] swsusp: Change code ordering in user.c

2006-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Change the ordering of code in kernel/power/user.c so that device_suspend() is called before disable_nonboot_cpus() and device_resume() is called after enable_nonboot_cpus(). This is needed to make the userland suspend call pm_ops->finish() after enable_nonboot_cpus() and before device_resume(), a