I expect http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 this bug to
pop again with this patch.
Regards,
Alex.
On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The restore part of the hibernation code should not call any 'platform'
> functi
Hi.
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 23:13 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a question, whether somebody made uswsusp working with
> Fedora Core 6? Old kernel is unacceptably slow for me, and I need
> ndiswrapper so kernel-suspend2 package is not an option, because
> I would have to recompile t
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 23:50, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:58, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
Hello Rafael
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wy
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The restore part of the hibernation code should not call any 'platform'
functions, since it doesn't carry out any power transition of the system.
Still, such functions are called from the restore code in kernel/power/user.c .
Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Ra
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Currently, much of the code in kernel/power/disk.c is duplicated in
kernel/power/user.c , mainly for historical reasons. By eliminating this code
duplication we can reduce the size of user.c quite substantially and remove the
maintenance difficulty resu
Hi,
This two patches are aimed at reducing the code duplication between
kernel/power/disk.c and kernel/power/user.c .
The first of them removes the calls to 'platform mode' functions from the
restore part. As far as I can tell after reading the ACPI specification,
they shouldn't be there.
The s
On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 23:50, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:58, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> >> Hello Rafael
> >>
> >> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:53, Ross Patterson wrote:
>> Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> "Paulo J. S. Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >>> I am not a kernel hacker,
Hello,
just a question, whether somebody made uswsusp working with
Fedora Core 6? Old kernel is unacceptably slow for me, and I need
ndiswrapper so kernel-suspend2 package is not an option, because
I would have to recompile the driver all the time. uwsusp being
in mainline kernel seems to be t
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:58, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
>> Hello Rafael
>>
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:02, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysock
On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:58, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> Hello Rafael
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:02, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> >> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday, 1 May 2007 14:13,
Hello Rafael
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:02, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 1 May 2007 14:13, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wro
On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:02, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 1 May 2007 14:13, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> >> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday, 1 May 2007 10:13, Tomas Pospisek's M
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 May 2007 14:13, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 1 May 2007 10:13, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
On the machine here:
$ s2ram -i
sys
On Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:53, Ross Patterson wrote:
> Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> "Paulo J. S. Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> I am not a kernel hacker, but I have tried to add some printk as
> >>> suggested by
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Acer, inc."
sys_product = "Aspire 5580 "
sys_version = "Not Applicable"
bios_version = "v1.3206"
I'm running Ubuntu Feisty server (kernel 2.6.20). I've never got s2ram
to work for quite some time (began at 2.6.9). I've tried
Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ross Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> "Paulo J. S. Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I am not a kernel hacker, but I have tried to add some printk as
>>> suggested by Pavel (I haven't used udelay, I was not sure what it did
>>> (Is the
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "VIA Technologies, Inc."
sys_product = "VT8623-8235"
sys_version = " "
bios_version = "6.00 PG"
The first setting in the list which are working are
s2ram -f -p -m
It's a great tool!
Thanks
Markus
--
Sitsofe Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 20:38 -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
>> What I'm curious of is if there are any other core 2 duo laptops having
>> this problem. If not, why does this laptop have the problem?
>
> I don't think it's just laptops:
> http://article.g
Where can I get this Beeping patch?
Thank you.
Mensaje Original:
-
De: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fecha: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:09:18 +0200
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED], suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Suspend-devel] Toshiba Satellite A70 gets hanged trying to
resume
s2ram -f simply works on my computer.
s2ram -i gives this output:
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Packard Bell NEC"
sys_product = "000"
sys_version = "P820008416"
bios_version = "R1.16 "
---
Hi!
> > Still, what we definitely want is _one single_ architecture independent
> > whitelist. And there is where hal-info comes in which is easy to update
> > for distributions etc. IMHO. I'm seeing this difficulty with the two
> > different lists for quite some time know and thought about possib
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 20:38 -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
> What I'm curious of is if there are any other core 2 duo laptops having
> this problem. If not, why does this laptop have the problem?
I don't think it's just laptops:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.suspend.devel/1679/match=o
Hi!
>Works fine for me with just "sudo s2ram -f"
>Output of s2ram -i is below:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/acpi/resume.d$ sudo s2ram -i
>This machine can be identified by:
>sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard"
>sys_product = "Presario V5000 (EW836EA#ABU) "
>sy
Hi!
> I still can't suspend/resume to ram.
>
> The machine enter in suspend mode (leds blinking orange) but when I push the
> power button to resume the leds gets blue (some sounds from CD) but the
> system gets hanged, I have to force a shutdown.
>
> How can I debug the problem?
Beeping patc
25 matches
Mail list logo
