On Monday 23 of July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 23 July 2007 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2007-07-23 20:12:21, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > On 7/23/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >I guess it is easiest way for gentoo, but... I'd prefer not to switch
> > > >
On Monday 23 of July 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
[...]
> keeping track of arch-specific quirks in s2ram yet (and
> i doubt it makes sense to implement since this whitelist stuff is going to
> move to HAL anyway).
btw. is anyone working on HAL-based whitelist ? :-)
> Stefan
--
Arkadiusz
On Friday 06 of July 2007, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> Any particular reason?
The only reason is - no one implemented external configuration file/database
for whitelist. Volunteers welcome.
> Regards, Bruno.
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linu
Makefile:
1.57 (tdykstra 13-May-07): ARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e
s/i.86/x86/ -e s/ppc.*/ppc/)
x86_64 not supported? Suspend builds (after fixing above) on x86_64 but no
idea if works.
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.
On Tuesday 27 of March 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:55:03 +0200
>
> "Luca Tettamanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/27/07, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is a first cut at supporting powerpc for s2*. For the s2ram bit it
> > > basically removes the vb
On Monday 05 of March 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> ;-) So let's do a poll: what distributions already include libx86 as a
> package?
>
pld-linux.org (also today suspend snap from cvs) ;)
--
Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.plhttp://ftp.pld-linux.org/
-
On Monday 05 of March 2007, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Note: this patch will not compile right now, you'll need to unpack libx86
> into ./libx86 inside the suspend source.
Why libpci is not included within suspend, same for zlib, lzf, gpg-error,
gcrypt? Leave it externall :)
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiew
On środa, 17 stycznia 2007, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > Ok, one last question to determine that :-)
> > Did you test with framebuffer or with vga console?
>
> VGA console.
>
> > If you already tested
> > with framebuffer, then "-p" is really &q
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:10, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:54:23AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:44, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > please try "s2ram -f -p -m", this could behave better in this
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:10, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:54:23AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:44, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > please try "s2ram -f -p -m", this could behave better in this
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 19:44, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> please try "s2ram -f -p -m", this could behave better in this case.
s2ram -f -p -m - suspends/resumes from both, console and X. There is a little
difference in vt handling, with -p -m vt is ,,more'' broken after resume
(saving vt state
# s2ram -i
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Acer"
sys_product = "TravelMate 2300"
sys_version = "Rev 1 "
bios_version = "3A07"
See http://en.opensuse.org/S2ram for details.
s2ram -f -a 1
(1) suspends but resume doesn't bring back LCD backl
On Monday 16 October 2006 09:59, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:12:27AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 October 2006 23:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Yeah, mainly because I have no time to learn autoconf. :-)
> >
> >
On Sunday 15 October 2006 23:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 October 2006 16:00, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 October 2006 15:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Now I have something in the brown-paper-bag category.
&
On Sunday 15 October 2006 15:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now I have something in the brown-paper-bag category.
>
> Without this patch s2disk on i386 (32-bit in general) doesn't work with
> swap files placed above 2 GB from the beginning of the partition. I think
> it'll also have a prob
1)
i686-pld-linux-gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -march=i686
-mtune=pentium4 -gdwarf-2 -g2 -feliminate-dwarf2-dups -DCONFIG_BOTH
-I/usr/local/include -DCONFIG_COMPRESS -DCONFIG_ENCRYPTmd5.o encrypt.o
config.o suspend.c s2ram.c -o s2both vt.o vbetool/lrmi.o vbetool/x86-common.o
vb
On Monday 10 July 2006 17:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I wonder if dlopen()ing openssl lib would be ok here.
>
> Could you please explain? I know nothing about dlopen() ...
You can use functions from library without linking with it explictly. Just
dlopen() it at runtime and then use some fu
On Sunday 09 July 2006 23:26, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Oh, too bad. However, AFAIK there are some licence-related problems
> > > > with openssl, so if Pavel wants uswsusp included in Suse you should
> > > > get rid of it
> > >
> > > Well, I don't know if this is a problem for SUSE.
On Sunday 09 July 2006 20:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Oh, too bad. However, AFAIK there are some licence-related problems
> > with openssl, so if Pavel wants uswsusp included in Suse you should
> > get rid of it
>
> Well, I don't know if this is a problem for SUSE. If so, I hope they'll
On Friday 30 June 2006 11:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 30 June 2006 10:44, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > As you all know by now I'm perfecting my debian package of uswsusp.
> > Debian currently supprts on the order of 10 archs. In was wondering
> > what archs are supported by uswsusp
On Monday 12 June 2006 00:38, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Ne 11-06-06 15:05:10, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > Fine for me.
> > >
> > > [Warning: some shells have "suspend" built in command, so specifing
> > > exact path like ./suspend is more important than usual.]
> >
> > mayb
21 matches
Mail list logo
