ECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:30:19AM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > Stefan, my laptop is different than Damien's. DV4000 is just the series
> > name.
>
> I feared that :-)
>
> > Stefan, if I'm correct I think you should add the complete sys_p
.
>
> It actually should already be in the database, since November 6th 2006,
> but with a different workaround.
>
> Fabio, did you also try the "-a" options on your dv4000 when you were trying
> to find the best options?
>
> Damien, are you using a framebuffer cons
Hi.
On 11/6/06, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:00:30PM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote:
...
> BTW (from the rest of this thread): radeonfb ignoring vga=0 seems like
> a bug worth reporting to me.
>
As Carl-Daniel explained it seems that r
Something like this maybe?
Regards,
Fabio
On 11/5/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2006 17:08, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:24:04PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > > It's just two small changes to Makefile:
> > >
> > >
Hi.
With the attached patch I'm able to build an RPM package with
checkinstall to use with Fedora Core 6.
It's just two small changes to Makefile:
* rename install-suspend to install
* add resume to install in /usr/sbin
Of course, user has to build its own initrd / initramfs with the resume bin
I think so, it works very well; I can live without the framebuffer
console and s2ram is much more useful ;--)
By the way, the exact model is DV4378EA (dv4000 is the generic name of
the series).
Regards,
Fabio
On 11/5/06, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >
Oh, sorry. I just read your previous email about how dangerous may be
hacking with my card.
Nevermind, then.
Regards,
Fabio
On 11/4/06, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You remember correctly. That was the right syntax.
>
> Now I'm running a radeonfb-enabled ker
You remember correctly. That was the right syntax.
Now I'm running a radeonfb-enabled kernel with framebuffer disabled
and s2ram -f -s -p works correctly.
So, i'm looking forward to testing your patches ;-)
Thanks,
Fabio
On 11/4/06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
usses quiet vga=0 init=/sbin/initng
Do you believe it now? :-)
Bye,
Fabio
On 11/4/06, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:02:30PM +0100, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > I already tried but vga=0 is simply ignored at boot.
>
> Hm, i almost can
Well, you asked for -vvn.
Relevant part is:
01:00.0 0300: 1002:5653
Subsystem: 103c:309e
Fabio
On 11/3/06, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already tried but vga=0 is simply ignored at boot.
>
> I should have added that to enable framebuffer for my card I
- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
SERR- wrote:
> Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > s2ram works perfectly both in console mode than in X with -f -s -p
> > options, but _only_ if framebuffer (vesa or radeonfb) is disabled in
> > kernel config.
>
> Can you try if vga=0 boot parame
Hi. My laptop is:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# s2ram
Machine is unknown.
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard"
sys_product = "Pavilion dv4000 (ES973EA#ABZ)"
sys_version = "
Hi Rafael
On 7/19/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The appended patch makes s2disk/s2both and resume use libgcrypt instead
> of openssl. It also replaces Blowfish with AES (128bit).
>
It works perfectly (only tested suspend-to-disk). Great work, as usual.
> The libgcry
Hi.
On 7/9/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 09 July 2006 12:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 July 2006 11:59, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q openssl
> > > openssl-0.9.8a-5.2
> >
> >
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 09 July 2006 10:40, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> > I'm sorry, but I tried and it did not make any difference :-(
>
> Thanks.
>
> So it seems I'll have to figure out what's up. On x86_64 it works,
> on
Hi Rafael,
I'm sorry, but I tried and it did not make any difference :-(
Fabio
On 7/8/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 July 2006 21:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 July 2006 21:33, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > > On 7/5/
Hi.
On 7/5/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 21:37, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > It says the image can not be read (or something like that, I did not
> > write it down).
>
> Does it say "resume: Encrypted image" before
wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 19:47, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > Hi Rafael.
> >
> > On 7/5/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 04 July 2006 13:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Monday 03 July 2006 23:40, Pavel M
Hi Rafael.
On 7/5/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 13:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 03 July 2006 23:40, Pavel Machek wrote:
]-- snip --[
> Attached is my key file with the passphrase 'test'. Perhaps you can try to
> use it.
>
> Greetings,
> R
[resending to suspend-devel after subscribing
]
On 7/1/06, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rafael.
>
> >
> > Please try to comment out the "encrypt" and "RSA key file" options in the
> > config file and see if that works.
> &g
Hi again. More details:
* without encryption everithing works
* encryption without /etc/suspend.key works
* encryption with /etc/suspend.key fails.
Regards,
Fabio
On 7/1/06, Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rafael.
>
> >
> > Please try to comment out the &qu
Hi Rafael.
>
> Please try to comment out the "encrypt" and "RSA key file" options in the
> config file and see if that works.
>
> Greetings,
> Rafael
>
I should have added more details: without encryption everything works,
I have upgraded to 0.2 to use the new "advanced encryption" feature.
Usin
22 matches
Mail list logo
