On Monday 06 August 2007 10:18:18 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I MUST GOING CRAZY
> PLEASE WAKE ME UP
Hi,
i don't see a reason to get loud here ;-)
(and btw no need to CC me for an answer, i'm reading the list)
It just wasn't clear what you meant (at least to me).
> Here is the original function
On Monday 06 August 2007 00:46:01 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday, 6 August 2007 00:05, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > >
> > > Well... It never worked :)
> >
> > Why exactly do you think so?
>
> Because you increment buf and return it... This wi
Hi,
On Friday 03 August 2007 01:13:56 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Can anyone please explain this usage?
> These flags should seldom be used.
Why do you think so? _GNU_SOURCE activates various features like
__STRICT_ANSI__, _ISOC99_SOURCE and so forth (see
include/features.h).
Thanks,
Frank
---
From: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I hate having to recompile the kernel, just to be able to debug suspend.
Remove CONFIG_DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND, replace it by a tunable in
/sys/power/disable_console_suspend.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by:
Hi!
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 10:39, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Well, Frank was wrong here for subtle reason, and I did not like it:
>
> If malloc failed (basically can not happen, but...) he'd suspend,
> anyway, failing to restore PCI config at the exit, and bringing video
> corruption back to us..
Hi,
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 20:31, Miroslav Ruda wrote:
> ..
> It's patched version from suspend-0.50-6 (rpm on OpenSuse 10.2). I
> have attached patched s2ram.c too.
>
> Best regards
>
> Mirek Ruda
thanks a lot for your testing.
I now have a new version of the patc
