On Monday, 6 November 2006 08:14, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:46:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > As far as the interruptible freeing is concerned, is it _really_ that
> > important? Currently the shrinking of memory is common code and I don't
> > think
> > the
Hi!
> > Could memory freeing be separated into separate ioctl()? That would
> > allow us to do interruptible freeing (in small hunks), and allow
> > timing done from userland...
>
> Well, I prefer the timing being done by the kernel, because it's easliy
> grepable in the dmesg output and it can b
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:46:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> As far as the interruptible freeing is concerned, is it _really_ that
> important? Currently the shrinking of memory is common code and I don't think
> the interruptibility is a good enough reason to make things more complicated
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:21:37PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > Bootsplash only drops to verbose mode on escape and F2 as far as I can
> > see. At least the kernel has something like this:
> >
> > ---
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BOOTSPLASH
> > /* This code has to be redone for some non-x86 plat
Hi,
On Sunday, 5 November 2006 12:25, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > Ok, maybe this is something we should look into later, since i really
> > > > > often
> > > > > see machine freeing memory for 30 seconds, snapshotting for another
> > > > > 20 seconds
> > > > > and then writing for 10
Hi!
> > > > Ok, maybe this is something we should look into later, since i really
> > > > often
> > > > see machine freeing memory for 30 seconds, snapshotting for another 20
> > > > seconds
> > > > and then writing for 10 seconds (or at least it feels like that :-).
> > >
> > > The freeing of
Hi!
> > > Which key do you prefer?
> >
> > I don't know. Escape sounds pretty logical :-)
> > Go ahead, i don't even know if this is an issue (Holger could probably test
> > what happens to the escape that sends bootsplash into verbose mode, i'm not
> > sure if this one is even propagated to user
On Saturday, 4 November 2006 10:03, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:07:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > Ok, maybe this is something we should look into later, since i really
> > > often
> > > see machine freeing memory for 30 seconds, snapshotting for another 20
>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:07:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Ok, maybe this is something we should look into later, since i really often
> > see machine freeing memory for 30 seconds, snapshotting for another 20
> > seconds
> > and then writing for 10 seconds (or at least it feels like
On Friday, 3 November 2006 14:57, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 04:08:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 13:13, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 2 November 2006
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
> Bootsplash only drops to verbose mode on escape and F2 as far as I can
> see. At least the kernel has something like this:
>
> ---
> #ifdef CONFIG_BOOTSPLASH
> /* This code has to be redone for some non-x86 platforms */
>
On Fri 03. Nov - 14:57:10, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 04:08:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 13:13, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 11:24,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 04:08:20PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2006 13:13, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 11:24, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > The app
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 23:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2006-11-02 23:07:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > > > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
> > > > > > > saving by
> > >
On Thu 2006-11-02 23:07:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
> > > > > > saving by
> > > > > > pressing Ctrl+c.
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be nice to abor
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:43, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Sounds good, but generally we have two options now: We can apply the
> > > > patch
> > > > as is and then add the libsplashy function or we can wait with applying
> > > > the
> > > > patch until the libsplashy function is re
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
> > > > > saving by
> > > > > pressing Ctrl+c.
> > > >
> > > > It would be nice to abort with escape or something... ctrl+c is going
> > > > to be "interest
Hi!
> > > Sounds good, but generally we have two options now: We can apply the patch
> > > as is and then add the libsplashy function or we can wait with applying
> > > the
> > > patch until the libsplashy function is ready.
> > >
> > > So, if the patch doesn't break splashy, I'd like to apply
Hi!
> > > > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
> > > > saving by
> > > > pressing Ctrl+c.
> > >
> > > It would be nice to abort with escape or something... ctrl+c is going
> > > to be "interesting" for users using splashscreen.
> >
> > OK
>
> Escape (and f2) swit
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 20:47, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:20:39 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 16:55, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:10:04 +0100
> > > schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:20:39 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2006 16:55, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:10:04 +0100
> > schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 14:49, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 16:55, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:10:04 +0100
> schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 14:49, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > > Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:07:36 +0100
> > > schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:10:04 +0100
schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2006 14:49, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:07:36 +0100
> > schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The appended patch allows the users of
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 14:49, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:07:36 +0100
> schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
> > saving by pressing Ctrl+c.
> >
> > Comments welcome.
>
> This is
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 13:13, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 2 November 2006 11:24, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
> > > > saving by
>
Op Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:07:36 +0100
schreef "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image
> saving by pressing Ctrl+c.
>
> Comments welcome.
This is not going to work for splashy. We will need wrap the call to
'read' in the sp
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2006 11:24, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image saving
> > > by
> > > pressing Ctrl+c.
> >
> > It would be nice to abort with escape or
Hi!
> > > > @@ -451,20 +476,34 @@ static int save_image(struct swap_map_ha
> > > > error = swap_write_page(handle);
> > > > if (error)
> > > > break;
> > > > +
> > > > if (!(nr_pages % m)) {
> >
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 11:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 November 2006 11:24, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image saving
> > > by
> > > pressing Ctrl+c.
> >
> > It would be nice to abort with escape or somet
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 11:24, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image saving by
> > pressing Ctrl+c.
>
> It would be nice to abort with escape or something... ctrl+c is going
> to be "interesting" for users using splashscreen.
OK
>
Hi!
> The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image saving by
> pressing Ctrl+c.
It would be nice to abort with escape or something... ctrl+c is going
to be "interesting" for users using splashscreen.
> - printf("suspend: Saving image data pages (%u pages) ... ",
> n
Hi,
The appended patch allows the users of suspend to abort the image saving by
pressing Ctrl+c.
Comments welcome.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
suspend.c | 48 +---
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
==
32 matches
Mail list logo
