Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-11-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 6 November 2006 23:51, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 04:26:21PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > OTOH some people reported that Ubuntu kernels successfully suspended (and > > resumed) machines which the kernel.org kernels failed to suspend (or resume) > > so it l

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-11-06 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 04:26:21PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > OTOH some people reported that Ubuntu kernels successfully suspended (and > resumed) machines which the kernel.org kernels failed to suspend (or resume) > so it looks like Ubuntu has fixed some suspend-related driver problems. I

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-11-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > On a completely unrelated note I recently installed Ubuntu Edgy to > have a stable system with some new features but was annoyed that > suspend to ram does not work there. They don't seem to use s2ram or > even have packages for it. I tried just using an s2ram binary I had > downloaded som

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-11-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Thursday, 2 November 2006 15:32, Sheer El-Showk wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Following up on this I noticed you checked on my kernel bug report > (bug #7135) to see if any of the kernel devs are working on it and > Alan said that it will only be addressed as part of a larger project. > Are you

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-11-02 Thread Sheer El-Showk
Hi Rafael, Following up on this I noticed you checked on my kernel bug report (bug #7135) to see if any of the kernel devs are working on it and Alan said that it will only be addressed as part of a larger project. Are you (and others) planning to look at this (and related bugs) after you release

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-10-13 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > I think we've got almost everything we wanted (compression, encryption, > > > checksumming, splash support, swap files support) in s2disk and we can do > > > s2both quite reliably, so I guess we can call the release 1.0. ;-) > > > > I'd call it 0.8, maybe 0.9. It is not widely-enough te

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-10-13 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:28:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > Unfortunately I now have only a little time for programming due to my work > on the university, but I hope to be less busy around 11 November, so I'd like > to make a release at that time. Ok, that gives me some time to

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-10-13 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:43:55 +0200 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > Unfortunately I now have only a little time for programming due to my work > > on the university, but I hope to be less busy around 11 November, so I'd > > like > > to make a release at that time. That's a go

Re: [Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-10-12 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Unfortunately I now have only a little time for programming due to my work > on the university, but I hope to be less busy around 11 November, so I'd like > to make a release at that time. > > I think we've got almost everything we wanted (compression, encryption, > checksumming, splash sup

[Suspend-devel] Release, maybe?

2006-10-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, Unfortunately I now have only a little time for programming due to my work on the university, but I hope to be less busy around 11 November, so I'd like to make a release at that time. I think we've got almost everything we wanted (compression, encryption, checksumming, splash support, swap f