]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:50:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Jeep diesels
--- Michael Friebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a few thousand miles on B100 in a 2006 U.S.
2.8L Jeep Liberty CRD. No problems other than an
ongoing fuel system air leak
"If you have...what the freak is all this "Show me the data!" stuff?"
It's a simple crucial request. Give us reason to believe what is claimed. Demanding sufficient evidence is not a “gun.” It is a positive creative contribution most fundamental to good understanding conciliation. Data is
Health care today is industrialized medicine, driven by profit focused on
treating the symptom rather preventing the disease. It is up to the individual
to apply skepticism to the claims of this industry to protect both health
pocketbook. We must take full responsibility for our health if
Hi Mary;
I've found curiosity in many things and have always
enjoyed the wondering process my mind can take.
Curiosity, wonderment, imagination are some of the
most wonderful things that we experience, being not
only productive but probably essential, and really add
something of great beauty to
but I am also a sceptic of the idea that science is
the be all and end all or that it has all the
answers.
So then, what other epistemic method do we have from
which to form reliable conclusions? It may be that it
is the definition/scope of science that is in question
here. I claim that there
Abuse is exactly right. These examples show no
failure in the method of science itself. Mike
--- D. Mindock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GE crops, excessive salt, and aspartame barely
scratch the surface of the corporate use of
fraudulent studies to foist harmful products or
ideas onto
Hi Joe;
This is because your claims are based on limited
awareness and limited experience. You are unaware that
there is a limit to your experience so you naturally
assume that the world is the totality of your
experience of it.
I am very much aware of the limit of my experience but
I do accept
It's narrow in that it's confined to reality.
It's not that much of what most consider relevant is
ignored; it's that science cannot confirm such ideas.
It's not a question of volition, in which we choose
not to go there; it's a question of capability.
Science is not a limitation imposed upon
Science is based upon an original concept .. and that
concept is a theory .. not fact.
Are you then saying that your computer is a theory?
At which point do you claim science to fail?
If a thing (whatever it may be) is testable, then it
will, in time, be discovered acknowledged in our
Here's a nice report on the subject:
9/11 Conspiracy Theories: The 9/11 Truth Movement in
Perspective
by Phil Molé
At the Hyatt Regency OHare near Chicago, a crowd of
approximately 400 people has gathered on a pleasant
summer evening. Some are old and some are young; some
are dressed in
10 matches
Mail list logo
