Found a link comparing -- ethanol to gasoline relationship.
Includes E-85, compression ratio, mpg, emissions, supercharger
Also a through "Properties of Fuels" including:
gasoline, diesel fuel, methanol, ethanol, MTBE, propane, CNG, hydrogen.
http://www.e85fuel.com/information/fuelpro
Something that others on this list have mentioned
about net energy of ethanol.
Didn't notice a emphasis on humanure, methane, fertilizer,
insecticides, herbicides or other. plastic ides (sp?).
From this site:
Northwest Iowa Community College (NWICC)
Sheldon, Iowa
"Ethanol - As A Fu
iofuel] Is it now time to talk to your congressman??
again
steve spence wrote:
>
> Gasoline is ~118,000 BTU/gallon
> Diesel is ~135,000 BTU/gallon
> Ethanol is ~80,000 BTU/gallon
> BioDiesel is ~117,000 BTU/gallon
>
> this, btw, is very interesting. take the time to
ran 13.5 to 1 grandma could probably
run a but higher.
Fuel efficiency is directly proportional to compression ratio.
Kirk
-Original Message-
From: MH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:34 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Is it now time to talk
steve spence wrote:
>
> Gasoline is ~118,000 BTU/gallon
> Diesel is ~135,000 BTU/gallon
> Ethanol is ~80,000 BTU/gallon
> BioDiesel is ~117,000 BTU/gallon
>
> this, btw, is very interesting. take the time to go through it all.
>
> http://www.tc.gc.ca/envaffairs/climate/doc_converti/Etoh/ETOH-FN
Mr Beggs
I read your link and noticed that it was dated April 1997. In the article it
said that the lawyers for Ethyl thought the lawsuit would be over by year's
end. Is this lawsuit over yet and if so, how did this end?
George
"Neoteric Biofuels Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes,
>Yes, and we in Canada should do the same to Ethyl, eh?
>
>They set the precedent that will now serve Methanex.
>
>See: http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/envronmt/ethyl.htm
>
>
>Edward Beggs, BES, MSc
>www.biofuels.ca
How about Gerber?
... Chiefly because of this false advertising, according t
://www.webconx.dns2go.com/2000/humanpower.htm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "MH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Is it now time to talk to your congressman?? again
> What I've learned is US corn (ethanol)
&
Yes, and we in Canada should do the same to Ethyl, eh?
They set the precedent that will now serve Methanex.
See: http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/envronmt/ethyl.htm
Edward Beggs, BES, MSc
www.biofuels.ca
on 4/30/02 1:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Hello Keith
nd to biofuel
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
cc: (bcc: Shaen Rooney/APCP/DEQ/MODNR)
Subject:RE: RE: [biofuel] Is it now time to talk to your
congressman?? again
Hello Keith and everybody
I read the links you sent, it kinda leaves a man speechless.
Wouldn't
Hello Keith and everybody
I read the links you sent, it kinda leaves a man speechless.
Wouldn't you think that California could counter sue Methanex for the cost of
cleaning up the pollution and for endangering human lives. Couldn't Menthanex
be held accountable for what it's chemical did to t
What I've learned is US corn (ethanol)
and soybean (biodiesel) are net gain fuel producers.
The US has a excess crop and few nations buying.
US gov't corn/soybean subsidy payments are much lower
then US gov't petroleum subsidy payments.
US gov't deficits are largely do to importing fore
, April 30, 2002 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] Is it now time to talk to your congressman?? again
> Hi Jesse
>
> >I'm in Chapter one of "Seven Sister," the book about the oil companies.
It
> >is riveting! Finally the real history of how far the government is up b
/ web design | stamford, ct |
>203.324.4371
>- Original Message -
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:32 PM
>Subject: RE: [biofuel] Is it now time to talk to your congressman?? again
>
>
> > I heard sometime back that the company t
Hello George
Good points you make. The company's called Methanex. Here's some background:
http://ens-news.com/ens/sep2001/2001L-09-07-09.html
NAFTA used to challenge environmental laws - September 7, 2001
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20011015&c=1&s=greider
The Right and US Trade Law: In
design | stamford, ct |
203.324.4371
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: [biofuel] Is it now time to talk to your congressman?? again
> I heard sometime back that the company that made MTBE was going to sue th
I heard sometime back that the company that made MTBE was going to sue the
state of California because they had banned MTBE. This was a Canadian company
and that the MTBE ban was in violation of the NAFTA agreement. I would take
this to mean that MTBE is imported from Canada. California Senato
Arguments against US corn and soybean biofuel seems
outlandish IF it boosts bushel price due to increased
demand thus lowering US gov't subsidize payments
helping to balance US deficits
and
I would think the savings might provide synergy for
invested interest in further development of
Dayton thinks America is ready for a biofuels boom, since the bill
also contains his idea for a new biodiesel tax credit of up to $1 a
gallon.
"The alternative is to do nothing, to make no change," Dayton said.
http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress/news/local/3131380.htm
>> or simply ta
20 matches
Mail list logo
