Appal Energy wrote:
>>I haven't looked at a comparison much, myself. I'm building a
>>continuous processor more because I want to than for any other reason.
>
>
> Well, when you get the thing duct taped together, installed in an explosion
> proof bunker and ready to test, we ought to run some s
sides, cradle
to grave.
Todd Swearingen
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Petrillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] continuous process plans
> Hello, Todd.
>
> Appal Energy wrote:
> > Alan,
> >
>
Keith Addison
>
> biofuel@yahoogroups.com
>
> @journeytoforeve cc:
>
> r.org> Subject: Re:
>[biofuel] continuous process plans
>
>
>
>
Subject: Re: [biofuel]
continuous process plans
15.08.2003 23:19
Hello, Todd.
Appal Energy wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Call me a dinosaur, or just one who has narrowed his focus to the near
> exclusion of continuous processing, but what is OFM?
Oh, sorry. Oscillatory Flow Mixer.
http://www.cheng.cam.ac.uk/groups/polymer/OFM/index.html
Basically, it's an easy way t
-- Original Message -
From: "Alan Petrillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] continuous process plans
> Appal Energy wrote:
> >>>A major disadvantage, I think, would be that continuous processors
en logged in
at Yahoo.
Best
Keith
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 18. august 2003 22:40
> > To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [biofuel] continuous process plans
> >
> > Hi Johs
> >
Keith Addison
>
> biofuel@yahoogroups.com
>
> @journeytoforeve cc:
>
> r.org> Subject: RE:
>[biofuel] continuous process plans
>
>
>
>
Appal Energy wrote:
>>>A major disadvantage, I think, would be that continuous processors
>>>are not suitable for two-stage processes, is that right?
>>
>>Well, yes and no. What you have to do, effectively, is to build two
>>processors. One for the acid stage and a second one for the base stage.
Yup.
And the files section is shut of for users to use?
Johs.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18. august 2003 22:40
> To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [biofuel] continuous process plans
>
> Hi Johs
>
&
> > A major disadvantage, I think, would be that continuous processors
> > are not suitable for two-stage processes, is that right?
>
> Well, yes and no. What you have to do, effectively, is to build two
> processors. One for the acid stage and a second one for the base stage.
Well, yes and no.
dison
Subject: RE: [biofuel]
continuous process
J Allen wrote:
> Guy you can go through a company call micro motion they make pump and
> meters that once are set they will deliver the amount you want and need.
> Jim Allen
I found Micro Motion, as a subsidiary of Emerson Process, but all I saw
there was meters, not pumps. Do you have a link
Keith Addison wrote:
> Hello Andreas, Tomas
>> - The reactor size can be much smaller (only a couple of litres
>>instead of 55 gallons...) and thus better fits in the basement of my
>>house...
>
>
> Yes, an advantage perhaps, depending on circumstances.
>
> A major disadvantage, I think, wo
me
with details of the tif file.
Best
Keith
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 18. august 2003 21:32
> > To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [biofuel] continuous process plans
> >
> > >
Upload it to the files section?
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith Addison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18. august 2003 21:32
> To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [biofuel] continuous process plans
>
> >Andrew,
> >
> >it seems I cannot
Hello Andreas, Tomas
>Keith, Thomas,
>
>I mentioned the continuous approach in a comment beginning of July (see
>attached email conversation) and out of your response (Keith) I got the
>impression that this is not very interesting for the forum. May be this is
>a misunderstanding and I would like
>Andrew,
>
>it seems I cannot attach anything to my emails. Would you like to give me
>your email-address that I can send you the patent as a tif-file?
The list doesn't accept attachments, as an essential anti-virus
measure. Please contact me off-list about this, I can probably
arrange somethin
biofuel@yahoogroups.com
>
>
> @baylink.com>
> cc:
>
>
>
:
Subject: Re: [biofuel]
continuous process plans
18.08.2003 09:18
Please respond
Andreas W Ohnsorge wrote:
>
>Keith wrote:
> FYI, there's a continuous reactor design here:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_processor.html#continuous
>
> Some people we know are working successfully with small-scale
> continuous designs but they're not ready to talk about it yet.
> Judgi
:
17.08.2003 08:22 Subject: Re: [biofuel]
continuous process plans
Please respond
to biofuel
:
17.08.2003 08:22 Subject: Re: [biofuel]
continuous process plans
Please respond
to biofuel
Keith Addison
Andreas W Ohnsorge wrote:
> Tomas,
>
> I am currently on some similar route - I had some experience with batch
> process and am about to construct a continuous processor following a Patent
> from Metallgesellschaft out of 1985. Could explain a bit the basis of your
Could we please have s
Hello Andreas, Tomas and all
>Tomas,
>
>I am currently on some similar route - I had some experience with batch
>process and am about to construct a continuous processor following a Patent
>from Metallgesellschaft out of 1985. Could explain a bit the basis of your
>process / could you give me you
Tomas,
I am currently on some similar route - I had some experience with batch
process and am about to construct a continuous processor following a Patent
from Metallgesellschaft out of 1985. Could explain a bit the basis of your
process / could you give me your email address I really would like
27 matches
Mail list logo
