Marty Sullivan wrote:
>
>It's just the fact that you're already serving compressed content from a
>web server, you're adding more overhead to the client who has to inflate
>and then also interpret the compressed svgz file. I can't imagine that your
>svg files take up so much space on your server th
It's just the fact that you're already serving compressed content from a
web server, you're adding more overhead to the client who has to inflate
and then also interpret the compressed svgz file. I can't imagine that your
svg files take up so much space on your server that storing them as svgz
save
Hi,
Marty Sullivan has claimed that it's better to put SVG's on your website as SVG
rather than SVGZ. I've yet to hear that from anybody else so I'd like to know
the opinion of others on this.
There is a third option, particularly if you have multiple simiar files (as is
likely with a web comi
Hi,
The first thing is to diganose why I'm getting contradictory information about
the amount of traffic I'm getting. If I really am getting a lot more traffic
than I thought, I probably should do things to try to convert it into income. I
could then justify to myself and my wife spending more
4 matches
Mail list logo
