Probably the only honest answer to your question...
Yes,
Francis
--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "gee_whiz_bang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I just installed the ASV 6 beta (from
> http://www.adobe.com/svg/viewer/install/beta.html )
> and it looks really good. The antialiasing looks be
I had to quit using the 6pr, because it looks like it has a resource
leak of some kind. After a few minutes of poking around on my graphic
(whick is just doing mousovers / zooming / panning) it started
getting really slow and unresponsive, which never happens with the
ASV3 version. So we really
Your post on this just sounds like you hope that Adobe will see the need to
restart work on SVG, but in some way confirms that they have set it aside at
the moment.
I certainly didn't find the wishy-washy statements by the Adobe people here
to be very encouraging at all. And the long-in-the-tooth
--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Geoffrey Swenson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My take on it is that the app I have just written will probably have
to be
> modified later to use XAML or whatever actually becomes the
standard. It
> looks like there are a lot of contenders for this sort
--- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Schiller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "Geoffrey Swenson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My take on it is that the app I have just written will probably have
> to be
> > modified later to use XAML or what
I like the idea of vendor neutral, but it needs to be a POPULAR
standard first and foremost for me. If M$ succeeds at making XAML the
way to go, so be it. I am not going to fight it.
If this happens other vendors will create their own XAML interfaces,
and we will get to the same functionality
> SVG and Flash are competing technologies. They are both graphically
rich,
> scriptable, and interactive.
>
I would more properly state that SVG and MXML are competitors. They
are both XML, graphically rich, scriptable and interactive. I see no
reason that Adobe can't compile SVG into native
I think, yet to emerge technologies/inventions and market would force
them to rethink about SVG. They have lot riding on Flash and PDF and
cannot afford to loose out. Hence will be forced to make tough
choices. Although Flash is good technology, it has some fundamental
limitations. They need a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That's where I
> see Microsoft as having a particularly strong tool in Sparkle - it
gives a
> design environment that allows designing and programming to work
> synergistically. To the best of my knowledge SVG hasn't had such a
tool.
Haven't looked at Sparkle at al
Hi, Geoffrey-
Well, unless Francis has some sort of insider knowledge, I think it's safer
to go with what Adobe themselves have said:
* SVG-Tiny support (in mobile stuff) will continue (from the Adobe/MM merger
FAQ)
* SVG support in Adobe Illustrator will expand (from Jon Ferraiolo on this
list)
At 12:29 PM 12/15/2005, gee_whiz_bang wrote:
>Adobe may be looking over its shoulder at XAML and is waiting to see
>where it goes before they invest any more into SVG. If so, they are
>missing an opportunity to become a new web standard, but perhaps they
>don't see any profit in it, so they don't b
On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 6:01:52 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
GS> Your post on this just sounds like you hope that Adobe will see the need to
GS> restart work on SVG, but in some way confirms that they have set it aside at
GS> the moment.
GS> I certainly didn't find the wishy-washy statements by th
Chris Lilley ha scritto:
>On Thursday, December 15, 2005, 6:01:52 PM, Geoffrey wrote:
>
>GS> Your post on this just sounds like you hope that Adobe will see the need to
>GS> restart work on SVG, but in some way confirms that they have set it aside
>at
>GS> the moment.
>
>GS> I certainly didn't fi
Currently, there are not any XML markup elements for drawing primitives
within MXML. However, ActionScript, which is the scripting language used
with MXML / Flex does have support for graphic instructions.
It would be possible (and I don't believe too difficult) for a developer
to create new MX
ECTED]
-Original Message-
From: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mike Chambers
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:37 PM
To: svg-developers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [svg-developers] Re: Is Adobe abandoning SVG?
Currently, there are not any XML m
Hi-
Mike Chambers wrote:
|
| It would be possible (and I don't believe too difficult) for
| a developer to create new MXML tags / components that exposed
| the underlying ActionScript drawing API to the XML layer.
| i.e., so you could do something like this:
|
|
Alternately, you could use an
In a message dated 16/12/2005 13:45:45 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Haven't looked at Sparkle at all, but just from reading your
description, the SVG suite that Corel abandoned a while ago sounds like
what you mean: an environment that enabled people to design SVG graphics
a
17 matches
Mail list logo