Hi all,
I'm working on a product that generates SVG graphics. We've been
recommending use of the Adobe SVG Viewer where it's available, and
Mozilla SVG elsewhere. Since development is done on an AMD64 Linux box,
we use Mozilla SVG ourselves. However, we are getting reports from
users that one o
On Thursday, September 22, 2005, 11:30:40 PM, Mike wrote:
MCF> Hi all,
MCF> I'm working on a product that generates SVG graphics. We've been
MCF> recommending use of the Adobe SVG Viewer where it's available, and
MCF> Mozilla SVG elsewhere. Since development is done on an AMD64 Linux box,
MCF>
On Thursday, September 22, 2005, 11:30:40 PM, Mike wrote:
MCF> Hi all,
MCF> I'm working on a product that generates SVG graphics. We've been
MCF> recommending use of the Adobe SVG Viewer where it's available, and
MCF> Mozilla SVG elsewhere. Since development is done on an AMD64 Linux box,
MCF>
Chris Lilley wrote:
>On Thursday, September 22, 2005, 11:30:40 PM, Mike wrote:
>
>
...
>MCF> My hypothesis is that the AdobeSVG viewer is picking up some unexpected
>MCF> feature/property and isn't able to deal with it, while the
>MCF> Mozilla/KDE/Inkscape engines are slightly more robust in de
On Friday, September 23, 2005, 1:26:57 AM, Mike wrote:
MCF> Chris Lilley wrote:
>>On Thursday, September 22, 2005, 11:30:40 PM, Mike wrote:
>>
>>
MCF> ...
>>MCF> My hypothesis is that the AdobeSVG viewer is picking up some unexpected
>>MCF> feature/property and isn't able to deal with it, whil
Chris Lilley wrote:
>On Friday, September 23, 2005, 1:26:57 AM, Mike wrote:
>
>
>MCF> Okay, I have now defined a namespace for us (though not yet a DTD for
>MCF> it),
>
>A DDTD wouldn't help - combining DTDs for different name spaces is non
>trivial hackery.
>
>
I suppose, seems like overkill
6 matches
Mail list logo
