In message , Andriy Gapon
wri
tes:
> On 27/08/2020 19:51, Brandon Bergren wrote:
> > FWIW, on powerpc64, using /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is great because it avoids t
> he problem of having to unmount /boot (which is an msdos filesystem because p
> eitiboot doesn't understand ufs or zfs) to update the
On 27/08/2020 19:51, Brandon Bergren wrote:
> FWIW, on powerpc64, using /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is great because it avoids the
> problem of having to unmount /boot (which is an msdos filesystem because
> peitiboot doesn't understand ufs or zfs) to update the copy of zpool.cache
> that is on the
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Kyle Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:59 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-08-27 17:06, Kyle Evans wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM Kyle Evans wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> >
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:59 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-27 17:06, Kyle Evans wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM Kyle Evans wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is
On 2020-08-27 16:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <202008271350.07rdogqn055...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert
> writes:
>> In message <7e55d429-482b-2277-b340-2b85c6874...@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon
>> wri
>> tes:
>>> On 26/08/2020 16:13, Cy Schubert wrote:
Author: cy
Date: Wed Aug
On 2020-08-27 17:06, Kyle Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM Kyle Evans wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is newer
>>> than /boot/zfs/zpool.cache?
>>>
>>> slippy$ lh
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM Kyle Evans wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert wrote:
> >
> > What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is newer
> > than /boot/zfs/zpool.cache?
> >
> > slippy$ lh /boot/zfs/zpool.cache /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
> > -rw-r--r--
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is newer
> than /boot/zfs/zpool.cache?
>
> slippy$ lh /boot/zfs/zpool.cache /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4.6K Aug 25 07:19 /boot/zfs/zpool.cache
>
What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is newer
than /boot/zfs/zpool.cache?
slippy$ lh /boot/zfs/zpool.cache /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4.6K Aug 25 07:19 /boot/zfs/zpool.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4.7K Aug 27 06:20 /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
In message <202008271350.07rdogqn055...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert
writes:
> In message <7e55d429-482b-2277-b340-2b85c6874...@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon
> wri
> tes:
> > On 26/08/2020 16:13, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > > Author: cy
> > > Date: Wed Aug 26 13:13:57 2020
> > > New Revision: 364817
In message <7e55d429-482b-2277-b340-2b85c6874...@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon
wri
tes:
> On 26/08/2020 16:13, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Author: cy
> > Date: Wed Aug 26 13:13:57 2020
> > New Revision: 364817
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364817
> >
> > Log:
> > As of r364746
On 26/08/2020 16:13, Cy Schubert wrote:
> Author: cy
> Date: Wed Aug 26 13:13:57 2020
> New Revision: 364817
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364817
>
> Log:
> As of r364746 (OpenZFS import) existing ZPOOLs are not imported
> prior to zvol and mountcritlocal resulting in ZVOLs
Author: cy
Date: Wed Aug 26 13:13:57 2020
New Revision: 364817
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364817
Log:
As of r364746 (OpenZFS import) existing ZPOOLs are not imported
prior to zvol and mountcritlocal resulting in ZVOLs (swap and
virtual machine UFS filesystems) being
13 matches
Mail list logo
