Hi,
I've got a performance bug ("script is taking too long..." error) that
I can't repro, so I thought I'd try reducing the timout using the
ScriptLimits tag:
The thing is, the code does seem to be taking more than 1 second in
the initialization phase (where the bug report points to), but
ess automated. So, the
> wrapper idea would be favorable. Actually, being able to compile into AVM2
> would be most favorable... but this LocalConnection wrapper/hack works too I
> suppose :)
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2007 8:03 PM, Hudson Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > t
oel
>
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2007 2:25 PM, Hudson Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > You can communicate with an AVM1 swf loaded into an AVM2 swf through a
> > LocalConnection object. It is a PITA and the data chunk that can be
> > sent
You can communicate with an AVM1 swf loaded into an AVM2 swf through a
LocalConnection object. It is a PITA and the data chunk that can be
sent at one time is limited (something like 32k), but it does allow
back and forth. The big problem with this is you need code in your
AVM1 swf to connect to th
oh that's interesting. Thanks for the information on MONO. I did not
know about that before, have obviously not been following the C#/.NET
stuff...
Regards,
Hudson
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_
oh, sorry, c# - ignore my remark on .net, sorry
On 5/18/07, Hudson Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like nice work Sabastian, BTW. I just always find it a little
> odd to have open-source projects written in .NET, but maybe that
Yes Jon, you should port it to Flex/AS3 ;-) Adobe has made the Flex
SDK free, and I believe it works on Linux. I've only used it on
Windows myself. You get the command line compiler, debugger and AsDoc
writer.
Looks like nice work Sabastian, BTW. I just always find it a little
odd to have open-sou
hmm, a wiki sounds like a good idea to me as well.
Regards,
Hudson
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
On 1/24/07, daniel fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nice to hear someone's using the class="..." hack. You should be aware
> however, that it's a hack :) Not an ugly one, but it works only for mtasc and
> only for flash7.
>
Hmmm, only flash 7? I've been using your "beautiful hack" with mtasc
> * test the latest prerelease (0.2.11.22), and *report if it works*.
I tested 0.2.11.22 on my problem cases (not the made up ones, but the
real ones) and had no problems (yay!).
Of course, as you noted, it is still choking on that odd color thing,
but I have not actually encountered a swf with t
FYI- I created the test swfs with flash 8. I'm not sure what a
convolution filter is, but the crash case was created in flash 8, so
if there is such a filter in there, then it was also created with
flash 8.
Also, I was trying to narrow down the filter crash case, and I noticed
that, in addition to
fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Hudson Ansley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:35:12 -0500):
>
> > I've posted two example SWFs with issues in a zip file at:
> > http://hlamedia.com/swfmillPlaceObjectError2.zip
>
> Thanks Hudson, t
I've posted two example SWFs with issues in a zip file at:
http://hlamedia.com/swfmillPlaceObjectError2.zip
One generates the placeObject3 error ("toimport.swf"). This has a
library item with a blendmode *and* "cache bitmap" checked (the same
settings without cache bitmap does not generate an erro
Nice, that takes care of a bunch of placeObject3 errors I was getting.
However, I am still getting some, so I think I will make a test SWF
with a bunch of new Flash 8 features to see what that will turn up.
Also, is there a way to have the swfmill output list the line in the
XML input when given a
Ahh, ok, then eagerly awaiting the next pre-release. BTW- so far, no
other issues with 0.2.11.20
It may be that I'm not seeing issues even with these warnings because
the swfs with the blend tags in them are being linked in rather than
incorporated into the target swf, and the library items are on
test case is on it's way.
Regards,
Hudson
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
ok, I'll try to get you the test case - I feel bad having put this off
for so long considering how useful swfmill has been... I think you
are right about the filter - it may have started when I started using
some new flash 8 filter features in the asset swfs I was linking in...
Regards,
Hudson
O
I've been meaning to make a test case for this, but maybe it will add
to the info that Andrew has provided. I've been getting the following
type of warning when using swfmill to compile a swf:
[exec] WARNING: end of tag PlaceObject3 is @11208, should be @11207
seems like it started when I upg
Hi erixtekila,
I'm not familiar with this recursion limit tag, but it sounds
interesting. Could you explain how it is used? TIA
Regards,
Hudson
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
yes (sorry, should have checked before hitting send).
That's nice, I'll try it out, thanks
Regards,
Hudson
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
woa, is there documentation on the XSLT in swfmill stuff? I use ant in
eclipse to run XSLT for a swf creation process. Maybe I could simplify
it with swfmill, but not sure what it does with XSLT.
Regards,
Hudson
On 6/6/06, daniel fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> use swfmill's inherent xslt ca
That does sound like it could be useful. Interestingly, if you have a
swf created in swfmill that does a shared lib import of another swf,
and you look at the XML generated from that swf with swf2xml, it lists
all the export IDs from that swf. In the test I tried it was actually
quite redundant in
On 4/20/06, Steve Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hudson,
>
>
> The dramatic reduction in file size is likely due to the zip
> compression applied to a SWF. Is this data being sent over a network?
> If so, you might want to try enabling gzip compression on the server
> (i.e. in Apache's httpd.
FYI- I guess it has nothing to do with this dll, swfc just appears to
be choking on my script...
Regards,
Hudson
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
I'm trying to use swfc in the swftools package, but I get an error. I
tried two different versions for a test, same error:
error signature:
AppName: swfc.exeAppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: msvcrt.dll
ModVer: 7.0.2600.2180Offset: 00032a16
I also tried getting a new copy of msvcrt.dll,
>while you are completely right in saying swfmill doesn't compile AS,
something as "trivial" as
>an object definition could probably validly be constructed out of
low-level actions. you'd need
>to compile a simple array/object definition with MTASC and have a
look at the swf2xml
>output to see how
Thanks Steve! I am really impressed with the knowledge and willingness
to share it on this list.
You are right about the size, a ZIPPED XML is almost as small as the
SWF. However, I am also interested in saving the code and CPU time
parsing the XML. The SWFC looks like just the ticket, thanks agai
(sorry for the repost, had the wrong subject)
Can someone tell me if I can specify an #include file in a swfmill XML file?
I'm trying to set up a data-only swf, it will just have a line like:
data = {common: {a1:7, a2:9}}
but that line is long enough to exceed the 32k limit on AS2 classes.
But,
Can someone tell me if I can specify an #include file in a swfmill XML file?
Regards,
Hudson
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
Thanks Steve and Dan!
Here is my initial testing report:
WOOHOO! it works! :)
ahem, that is, I tested the build where I was making a swf that linked
to several shared libs (mix of 7 and 8) with swfmill (also building
the classes SWF to incorporate a class lib compiled with MTASC and
library of cl
IMO, creating a full-blown IDE would be prohibitively time consuming,
and there is Flash, after all :) Seems like one would have a very hard
time keeping up with their new releases...
That being said, I think it is useful to the extreme that one can
convert a swf to XML then back again if you need
I just looked at this too the other day (xml2swf and swf2xml) to check
out the headers... One thing I found interesting was that the XML
generated from my swf that links all the shared lib swfs I have been
using (only a 5k swf, so was not so tough to look at the XML); the XML
had many duplicate lin
oh, and much thanks to Erixtekila for patient explanation and getting
this ball rolling :)
___
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
We're primarily using swfmill to build the main SWF, which for us is
just a shell that links several shared libraries. I was won over by
swfmill when I found that it actually works better than the flash IDE
to link complex runtime shared libraries (that is, it works where
flash would fail for some
Thanks, sorry about the rehash, but I could not find a search feature
on the list archive...
I tried your suggestion (as I understood it) and the shared libs still
fail to load. All the swfs that are shared are published in 7, but the
main swf to which they are linked is published in 8 - linked sw
I have a reasonably complex project that is published (MTASC and
SWFMILL) with version=7, all working fine with several shared
libraries. When I publish with version=8, the shared libraries fail to
load. If I switch these shared libs to be included (use http://www.flashant.org/index.php?p=429&more=
36 matches
Mail list logo
