On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Pablo RodrÃguez oi...@web.de wrote:
Hi Matt,
I'm afraid that the Linux binary might not use compression for the
output PDF. I experienced that before with swfc (not sure with pdf2swf
[I can't remember it]). Which Linux distribution are you using? Did you
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:48:32 -0400
Matt Sergeant m...@hubdoc.com wrote:
Did you see the dots difference I posted most recently? I'm pretty
sure it's related to the dots, not compression, as swfdump gives a
significantly different output, and a visual inspection shows that
the two SWFs are
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:10 PM, List_Subs list_s...@mavdns.net wrote:
Sure, but I think the dots is the problem, and so I'd like to know
how to get the same results as the Mac produced, otherwise I'm going
to have to switch to an ImageMagick/convert version for this app and
use images.
I've been trying to debug why an 80KB PDF generates a 500KB SWF file.
If I run pdf2swf on a Linux box that's the size I get.
If I run it on a Mac I get a SWF file slightly smaller than the PDF.
I thought maybe this was a font issue so I copied all my fonts from the Mac
to the Linux box (after
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:08:37 -0400
Matt Sergeant m...@hubdoc.com wrote:
I've been trying to debug why an 80KB PDF generates a 500KB SWF file.
If I run pdf2swf on a Linux box that's the size I get.
If I run it on a Mac I get a SWF file slightly smaller than the PDF.
I thought maybe this
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:45 AM, List_Subs list_s...@mavdns.net wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:08:37 -0400
Matt Sergeant m...@hubdoc.com wrote:
I've been trying to debug why an 80KB PDF generates a 500KB SWF file.
If I run pdf2swf on a Linux box that's the size I get.
If I run it on a
