7 01:09:56 +0200
From: Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:swino
Pascal Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-06-07:
[snip]
> This is the normal routed case. I think this is what Daniel was
> looking for.
Not quite, but oh never mind. The point I was trying to make is the
fact that vtx engineers explained to a customer that he would not be
able to assign *any* addres
First usable, 01.
Some devices allow you to use network/broadcast addresses too and
this is not a problem for the LNS (you will understand because of the
strange routing at the end of the mail)
However, not all do, so using the +1 IP seems the best option.
The typical setups you can have i
First usable, 01.
Cu,
Jerome
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Daniel
> Roethlisberger
> Envoyé : lundi, 4. juin 2007 13:54
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice
>
Jérôme Tissières <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-06-04:
> Yes, I confirm if you order a /30, /29, /28, etc to VTX, the first IP
> of the subnet is assigned to the CPE with the right mask associated.
The "first" being what is normally referred to as the network address
(ending in bits 00) or the first "no
ge d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Daniel
> Roethlisberger
> Envoyé : dimanche, 3. juin 2007 22:46
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2
> Can anybody confirm that this is current practice at vtx? Are other
> providers doing the same?
On a cybernet 4-IP-Addresses ADSL setup I can actively use the two
"middle" IPs in a BRouter setup, the router using the lower address.
The vtx setup you describe is indeed kind of useless. If it'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-06-03:
> This setup works on Cisco and Zyxel ADSL as the WAN interface is using
> the IP from the LAN side and the LNS sees both a /32 and a /30
> route...not sure about other xDSL CPEs though (o;
In this setup, the PPP endpoint address of the CPE router
Hi,
> Normally when someone orders a /30, the ADSL router's PPP interface
> would get an address from an unrelated address range. The 4 addresses
> from the customer's /30 subnet can be used by the custumer for the
> network and broadcast addresses (-2), the router's LAN interface (-1),
> leaving
Evnin'
This setup works on Cisco and Zyxel ADSL as the WAN
interface is using the IP from the LAN side and the LNS
sees both a /32 and a /30 route...not sure about
other xDSL CPEs though (o;
cheers
rick
Daniel Roethlisberger schrieb:
It seems that vtx has some very strange way of configuring
Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Daniel
> Roethlisberger
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Juni 2007 21:23
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice
>
> It seems that vtx has some very st
It seems that vtx has some very strange way of configuring the /30
subnet when customers order 4 fix IP addresses.
Normally when someone orders a /30, the ADSL router's PPP interface
would get an address from an unrelated address range. The 4 addresses
from the customer's /30 subnet can be used b
12 matches
Mail list logo
