On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 20:11 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>
> > A git pull request would be nice but we do not have an
> > official git repo for the engine.
>
> I shouldn't ask "Why?", right?
Well, not me, at least. I use git for all I can.
Peter
___
On 2018-06-04, 16:09 GMT, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> My sword git repo is simply an ancient private copy. I am not
> sure it has ever been updated.
You know you can switch off pull requests and issues in Settings
tab of your repository? It would probably made you more happy,
because people
On 2018-06-04, 16:25 GMT, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> This is my fault. I missed it. A wider audience has write
> access to the locale's so they usually get approved and
> committed by others, but ultimately I need to make sure the
> submissions all get in. I'll take care of it.
So, what's
Matěj,
This is my fault. I missed it. A wider audience has write access to
the locale's so they usually get approved and committed by others, but
ultimately I need to make sure the submissions all get in. I'll take
care of it.
Troy
On 06/04/2018 04:43 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2018-05-30,
Hi Matej
My sword git repo is simply an ancient private copy. I am not sure it
has ever been updated. Also, it seems you misunderstand my overall role
- I am not the sword-engine guy. I have some limited subversion access,
including admittedly to the language stuff and the filters, but I would
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:44 AM Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2018-05-30, 10:19 GMT, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> > Given that module submission is and - has always been
> > - a definitive bottleneck in our setup I have spent
> > significant time to make it automated, reproducible and
> > hopefully faster
On 2018-05-30, 10:19 GMT, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Given that module submission is and - has always been
> - a definitive bottleneck in our setup I have spent
> significant time to make it automated, reproducible and
> hopefully faster too.
I don’t think that modules submission is the only
Dear All,
Given that module submission is and - has always been - a definitive
bottleneck in our setup I have spent significant time to make it
automated, reproducible and hopefully faster too.
"Faster" means that less time is necessary to actually do the deed and
put a module on the server,
Wonderful! That's far better than having two modules running around. Thank
you all for doing that. I admire the excellence.
Matt
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017, 5:46 PM Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
On 02/23/2017 07:43 PM, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
Karl, can I ask you to handle this in
On 02/23/2017 07:43 PM, ref...@gmx.net wrote:
> Karl, can I ask you to handle this in Xiphos?
I already expected as much.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to
Karl, can I ask you to handle this in Xiphos?PeterSent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos and weird autocorrects. Original Message Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Module SubmissionFrom: Karl Kleinpaste To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
On 02/23/2017 04:27 PM, Matt Zabojnik wrote:
>
> Any feedback on this? I see several of y'all have downloaded. Is this
> thing Go for launch?
>
It's fine, but as you said, you just replaced the images with higher-def
versions - the bdt, dat, and idx content is identical and the .conf diff
is only
Any feedback on this? I see several of y'all have downloaded. Is this thing
Go for launch?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017, 10:16 PM Matt Zabojnik wrote:
> Hm, I'm not sure what happened to that email then. I guess it didn't go
> through. In that case, it'll take longer than it takes!
>
Hm, I'm not sure what happened to that email then. I guess it didn't go
through. In that case, it'll take longer than it takes!
Here it is again, if ya'll would like to review it before I submit it
again, or have feedback on it.
http://bit.do/mattzabsmithatlashd
Just to be clear, I didn't
On 02/20/2017 11:16 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> I went on to search my modules email folder for "Smith Bible Atlas" and found
> nothing.
SmithBibleAtlas is a simple maps module that I made, Xiphos repo,
available since 2008.
___
sword-devel mailing
I went on to search my modules email folder for "Smith Bible Atlas" and found
nothing.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Module-Submission-tp4656712p4656718.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Did you send it to modules AT crosswire DOT org ?
I don't recall seeing this, and I am in the modules mailing list.
My role isn't uploading new submissions, but I usually dive in with testing
any.
NB. Any new or updated module submissions should be accompanied by a copy of
the source text file.
> Von: "Matt Zabojnik"
> I submitted an update to an already existing module a while back and didn't
> receive a response. I'm still getting my feet wet with the > SWORD
> project so I don't know how things usually go. Should I simply be more
> patient? How long does it
Hello,
I submitted an update to an already existing module a while back and didn't
receive a response. I'm still getting my feet wet with the SWORD project so
I don't know how things usually go. Should I simply be more patient? How
long does it normally take?
It was a high res version of the
Hi Peter,
As your uploads are to CrossWire Beta, will you be adding anything to this
wiki page?
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository
Best regards,
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Module-submission-tp4654224p4654237.html
Sent
Von: David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com
As your uploads are to CrossWire Beta, will you be adding anything to this
wiki page?
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository
You are welcome to do so.
___
sword-devel mailing list:
Von: David Haslam dfh...@googlemail.com
As your uploads are to CrossWire Beta,
The only reason I use the beta repository right now is to ensure I do not break
anything.
I do not intend to keep things long in there. At least not modules where the
updates were submitted by existing
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 19:59 +, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
I have pushed today an update of the Lithuanian module into the beta
repository.
I have now uploaded apart from the Lithuanian update an update to
FreCJE, a French Commentary, done by yvand and a new module called
Restored Version, a
I tested to install the modules you uploaded into the beta repository.
It seems to work pretty fine (for FreCJE, Lithuanian and RecVer) in
Xiphos/BibleTime (up-to-date versions).
(I noticed nevertheless in the RecVer module, / delimiters in Psalms and
Songs. I guess it can be corrected using
Hi Karl,
Thanks for the technical explanation. That makes sense.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Module-submission-tp4654224p4654232.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi Peter,
Using Xiphos for Windows, I was able to install the Lithuanian module
version 1.7, and index it, and then select its text for display.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Module-submission-tp4654224p4654226.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev
Hi Peter,
Using Xiphos for Windows, I was able to install the RecVer module version
1.0, and index it, and then select its text for display.
Minor quirk. I had to relaunch Xiphos in order to find it.
David
--
View this message in context:
On 10/28/2014 07:15 AM, David Haslam wrote:
Minor quirk. I had to relaunch Xiphos in order to find it.
I couldn't say why. I didn't. Did you refresh the repo?
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Hi Karl,
Using the Xiphos module manager, I installed Peter's new beta modules in
this order:
RecVer
Lithuanian
Obviously I had already refreshed the beta repo in order to get to that
stage.
Immediately after installing both modules, I used the Maintenance menu to
generate a search index for
On 10/28/2014 01:38 PM, David Haslam wrote:
Obviously I had already refreshed the beta repo in order to get to that stage.
Well, OK,...you didn't say at what stage you were, when you couldn't
find it. I thought you meant you couldn't find it in the set of modules
offered in the repo. And there
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 19:59 +, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
I hope to push some other submitted modules through.
Uploaded a new English translation Holy Bible Recovery Version. also
in beta.
Please feed back any problems downloading, installing or indeed with the
module itself.
Peter
I haven't had much time to attend to module submissions lately, except from
sources who are providing updates to their own submissions. We have had a lot
of problems lately with Slavic-language submissions, in that they frequently
contain copyrighted material without attribution (e.g. The text
-devel] Module submission status
Greetings,
I've submitted (to modu...@crosswire.org) a month or so ago a version 1.4
of Ukrainian (I.Ogienko) Bible which had few typos fixed and Red Letter support
added.
With few follow up e-mails later, haven't heard any response
Greetings,
I've submitted (to modu...@crosswire.org) a month or so ago a version 1.4 of
Ukrainian (I.Ogienko) Bible which had few typos fixed and Red Letter support
added.
With few follow up e-mails later, haven't heard any response in regards to the
submission.
Anyone know of the status,
I'm sorry for the delay, but they are on my todo list (just under the
new morphology, the revised Chinese modules, the Scriptures translation).
Delays are partly due to my just having been busy with travel, school,
teaching since early summer last year. But there are also inevitable
delays
Hi Guys!
I have sent three Daily Devotional module upgrades (DBD, Daily and SME)
to the below email but I have no idea where they are in the pipeline. Could
we have a list on the website or the Wiki that would list when mods were
submitted, approved, rejected, tested, by whom etc. That
36 matches
Mail list logo