Comment #1 on issue 1843 by smichr: Increase coverage of ode.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1843
I only looked at the ode part and would add the following (besides the
comments that
I made on your github page).
Here are some typos:
-# here
Comment #1 on issue 1838 by smichr: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1838
This works in python from the left or right.
2*[1,2,3]
[1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3]
[1,2,3]*2
[1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3]
2*'o'
'oo'
For sympy, however, we might want to override that
Comment #3 on issue 1838 by asmeurer: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1838
The motivation was this conversation on IRC:
xvedejas joined the chat room.
[11:43am] xvedejas: can anyone here help me with sympy?
[11:43am] xvedejas: it seems to have
Comment #4 on issue 1838 by smichr: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1838
In objection to my comment, we could reserve one of the sides (preferrably
right) for
the normal scalar behavior of python so [0]*S(2) would give [0, 0] and if
someone
Comment #2 on issue 1843 by asmeurer: Increase coverage of ode.py
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1843
Could you make a patch with all of these changes, to be applied on top of
my branch? That would be easier.
Comments:
Typos: Thanks for the catches. I always remember to
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 1837 by smichr: 0**(x-2) becomes (oo)**(2-x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1837
commit 1837 in smichr's 1766 branch at github retains the above behavior
but doesn't
let the exponent and multinomial expansions
Does anyone know if fixing these things would be possible? I am not to
familiar with decorators.
Two aspects of decorated functions annoy me. First off, the function name is
changed to the name of the decorated function. The result is that tests that
have @XFAIL show up as func_wrapper in
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2010-02-25 kell 07:46, kirjutas Aaron S. Meurer:
Does anyone know if fixing these things would be possible? I am not to
familiar with decorators.
Two aspects of decorated functions annoy me. First off, the function
name is changed to the name of the decorated
