On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Ondrej,
>
> Great thoughts, comments inline...
>
>> 1) MatrixForm, TableForm
>>
>> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/TableForm.html
>>
>> this I plan to put next to Tuple (sympy/core/containers.py). And
>> printers for it into pri
Hi.
I discovered Sympy just a few months ago, and I'm impressed.
I started to develope a General Relativity package based on Sympy at my
University. I've already written classes like Christoffel, Geodesic (which
computes the geodesic equations),Constants-of-motions (which computes the
constants of
Alexander,
> I discovered Sympy just a few months ago, and I'm impressed.
> I started to develope a General Relativity package based on Sympy at my
> University. I've already written classes like Christoffel, Geodesic (which
> computes the geodesic equations),Constants-of-motions (which computes t
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
>> Ondrej,
>>
>> Great thoughts, comments inline...
>>
>>> 1) MatrixForm, TableForm
>>>
>>> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/TableForm.html
>>>
>>> this I plan to put next to
On 03/08/2011 01:02 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
Alexander,
I discovered Sympy just a few months ago, and I'm impressed.
I started to develope a General Relativity package based on Sympy at my
University. I've already written classes like Christoffel, Geodesic (which
computes the geodesic equations
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>>
>>> Ondrej,
>>>
>>> Great thoughts, comments inline...
>>>
1) MatrixForm, TableForm
http://reference.wolfram.com
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Alexander,
>
>> I discovered Sympy just a few months ago, and I'm impressed.
>> I started to develope a General Relativity package based on Sympy at my
>> University. I've already written classes like Christoffel, Geodesic (whi
Ondrej,
> Well, I agree with Aaron, that if it is small, and manageable, it
> should be part of SymPy. Only when it becomes large, and there are
> people around it being able to manage it and release it separately, it
> makes sense to split it. At least my intuition tells me, that it is
> too earl
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 13:50, Brian Granger wrote:
> Ondrej,
>> However, allowing people to create packages and host it under the
>> sympy github organization is a great idea, that is for sure. To have a
>> well defined one module for one thing, e.g. let's say the quantum
>> stuff. E.g. not Ondre
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 13:50, Brian Granger wrote:
>> Ondrej,
>
>>> However, allowing people to create packages and host it under the
>>> sympy github organization is a great idea, that is for sure. To have a
>>> well defined one module for on
>>> However, allowing people to create packages and host it under the
>>> sympy github organization is a great idea, that is for sure. To have a
>>> well defined one module for one thing, e.g. let's say the quantum
>>> stuff. E.g. not Ondrej's quantum, Brian's quantum, but SymPy's
>>> quantum, part
On 03-08-2011, at 4:07 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
> You (and everyone at Enthought) definitely has more experience with
> these things than we do. We have long wanted to use namespace
> packages for IPython, but we are unwilling to rely on setuptools. The
> main advantage of using namespace pa
Tim,
>> You (and everyone at Enthought) definitely has more experience with
>> these things than we do. We have long wanted to use namespace
>> packages for IPython, but we are unwilling to rely on setuptools. The
>> main advantage of using namespace packages is that users will see the
>> relati
13 matches
Mail list logo
