Hi.
I've raised a PR for the auto_domain tool.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7234.
Kindly review it, and give your feedback.
Thank you
Shashank Aggarwal
On 3/6/14, Stefan Krastanov stefan.krasta...@yale.edu wrote:
We will probably also require documentation (in docstrings, which were
I need all output from sympy to be strings with latex code. How do I enable
this?
Wrapping all output in latex() is not what I need. I've found
init_printing(), but it chooses printing method based on my environment, I
cannot see how to force it to use latex printing.
(Motivation: I need this
Dear all,
I'm trying to use block matrices in the following way:
n1, n2 = symbols('n1 n2', integer=True)
U1 = MatrixSymbol('U1', n1, n1+n2)
U2 = MatrixSymbol('U2', n2, n1+n2)
D1 = MatrixSymbol('D1', n1, n1)
D2 = MatrixSymbol('D2', n2, n2)
D = BlockDiagMatrix(D1,
Everything is on the github.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/7235
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:32:21 AM UTC+4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
This is done. It took some time because I was only able to update 200
issues at a time. I accidentally sent out an email on one of them, so
sorry about
@Jo Thanks a lot! The last post cleared all things up. So basically, I can
enforce a standardized grammar and implement that used the likes of
modgrammar library which I think is quite convenient and suitable for the
task. I need to define the rules of the grammar and in such a way that any
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 1:41:21 PM UTC+1, F. B. wrote:
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 6:10:10 AM UTC+1, Matthew wrote:
I actually do believe that a core for expressions with indices is
possible here. But I don't have as much experience as Kasper, so I could
be wrong.
What about
Am 07.03.2014 12:47, schrieb Aditya Shah:
@Jo Thanks a lot! The last post cleared all things up. So basically, I can
enforce a standardized grammar and implement that used the likes of
modgrammar library which I think is quite convenient and suitable for the
task. I need to define the rules of
@Jo Thanks again for the clarifications. I did some research and I observed
that conversion from Math Spec Languages to Sympy equivalent can be done
via the use of RE themselves. So this will allow for a very efficient
grammar(RE are manifestations of FSAs and the their conversions to CFGs is
Am 07.03.2014 14:23, schrieb Aditya Shah:
@Jo Thanks again for the clarifications. I did some research and I observed
that conversion from Math Spec Languages to Sympy equivalent can be done
via the use of RE themselves.
I doubt that that's possible for all cases.
This is one of the typical
Thanks a ton for doing all the work for this. This will be a huge boost to
the community.
Aaron Meurer
On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:14 AM, Sergey Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com wrote:
Everything is on the github.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/7235
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:32:21 AM UTC+4,
Hi Viktor,
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Viktor Qvarfordt viktor.qvarfo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I need all output from sympy to be strings with latex code. How do I
enable this?
Wrapping all output in latex() is not what I need. I've found
init_printing(), but it chooses printing method
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Renato Coutinho
renato.couti...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Viktor,
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Viktor Qvarfordt
viktor.qvarfo...@gmail.com wrote:
I need all output from sympy to be strings with latex code. How do I
enable this?
Wrapping all output in latex()
I went through the work on the new module . The current new-assumptions
module is extremely easy to understand, is highly clean and also makes
computation much easier.
It needs to be extended to include all functionalities that the old
assumptions module catered to . Listing a few these would
@Jo, My philosophy is as much automation as possible. Now just for the sake
of argument consider this. We have 2 Math Spec languages A and B. Since
both are means to the same end, they differ only in subtle places. While
that might not be the case always, let us assume that it is so. By using
Currently I am going through the functions available in Matrix. One thing
that I have noted as a ordinary python programmer(note the developer) :
*Huge error is displayed if we call the functions with incorrect parameter.*
*For example: *
Following set of code will be an error as I am trying to
Currently I am going through the functions available in Matrix. One thing
that I have noticed as an ordinary python programmer(not the developer) :
*Huge error is displayed if we call the functions with incorrect parameter.*
*For example: *
Following set of code will be an error as I am trying
Improved the efficiency of order_at in rde.py.
Kindly review that.
There is also an issue that I have contributed to the branch that Chetna
was working on. Now till her branch is not merged my these changes wont get
merged. I'm trying to fix loose ends in her PR with her help in the
meanwhile.
Ondrej,
thank You for Your reply! Do You think it is reasonable to combine the
reworking of the assumptions system with the support for formal logic and
set theory as I described in my initial message -- or I should rather
concentrate on the assumptions system exclusively?
That is, I'm not
Hi,
have look at this pdf file
its contain information about what we want to implement for sympy...
Correct. This is the presentation related to the thesis.
If after gsoc we can run these examples within sympy
this will be a big success.
--
You received this message because you are
Hi,
and i would like to chat with you for discussion over this?
can you give me your gtalk contact details?
I don't use gtalk at all. Ping me on irc whenever
you like. (I might not respond, in that case I'm online
but afk.)
and is there any need to solve bugs of sympy?
There is the usual
Can this be a feasible idea to be worked upon for SoC ?? Any comments would
be great.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Amit Jamadagni bitsjamada...@gmail.comwrote:
I have gone through the package and it seems to have integrated sage and
SnapPy for computing Alexander's polynomial. They have
Here is more information about the financial aid
https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/participate/financial_aid/. If
you would like to attend scipy, but don't have any way to pay the
costs of attending, I encourage you to apply.
Regarding the talk(s), we should come up with a concrete plan on
What are the new additions to the tutorial given in SciPy 2013?
Cheers
Anurag
On Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:46:39 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
Here is more information about the financial aid
https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/participate/financial_aid/. If
you would like to attend
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-5WCvCIA2ngA/Uxpbxt9uOKI/ALc/DK48f1fjAEU/s1600/Screenshot+from+2014-03-08+05%3A21%3A21.png
Okay as of now. Chetna's branch passes all the tests. I have tried to make
some changes where I dont harcode the value of a. But it invariably fails
the tests.
I'm interested in using SymPy to model engineering systems. I'd like to
establish an object oriented model of the system in which the physical
parameters are symbolically linked based on their real-world constraints.
Next I'd like the user to be able to specify values for various parameters
Nothing yet, but if we propose one and it gets accepted, there are a
few parts that I wouldn't mind revisiting. And the tutorial itself
(not to mention docs themselves) could use some expanding, even though
what is there is more than enough for four hours. In my opinion, each
major submodule of
You should just push the changes. Then I can look over the code compared to
the pseudocode in Bronstein and see if you did it right.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Anurag Sharma anurag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah see the changes here
https://github.com/anurags92/sympy/commit/5933bfc1f80af5a7f3694a09bc044f0364d1dd39
I have commented on the things which need to be reviewed and what can be
ignored as of now.
Anurag
On Saturday, March 8, 2014 6:48:04 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
You should just
Hi Chris,
In order to simplify these further you'll need to break down U1 and U2 so
that they are of compatible shape with D1 and the 0-matrix. At the moment
there is no way to take these larger matrices and simplify them against
smaller ones. This mismatch would be more evident if we had
I do like the idea of dispatch. I'm not sure that I understand the rest
though. Maybe I need a more explicit example. We'll probably have to
convert back at some point.
For me an example of shared functionality might be indexing. Many matrix
expressions can be reduced to indexed expressions.
This is fantastic.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Sergey Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.comwrote:
Everything is on the github.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/7235
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 12:32:21 AM UTC+4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
This is done. It took some time because I was only
ya i want to get that big success..:)
just need your guidance in this project
On Saturday, 8 March 2014 02:52:54 UTC+5:30, rl wrote:
Hi,
have look at this pdf file
its contain information about what we want to implement for sympy...
Correct. This is the presentation related to the
ok will solve bugs.
and can you guide me in proposal?
On Saturday, 8 March 2014 02:55:26 UTC+5:30, rl wrote:
Hi,
and i would like to chat with you for discussion over this?
can you give me your gtalk contact details?
I don't use gtalk at all. Ping me on irc whenever
you like. (I
33 matches
Mail list logo
