Hello,
My name is Akshay Bhatia a freshman CS major at Lewis & Clark College in
Portland, Oregon. I am hoping to work on the Benchmark and Performance
project for the coming summer. My current proposal draft is linked below.
Please let me know of any discrepancies you see with your vision.
Hello everyone,
I am Akshay Ravindra Borse, currently in final year of B.E. (Information
Technology) at K. K. Wagh Institute of Engineering Education and Research,
Nashik, India. I am very well versed with programming languages like C,
C++, Python, R and Java. I am very much interested
Hi,
I would like to work on singularity functions for GSoC -2017. Can
someone please tell where do I get started. Some references for the domain
would be great. I have good background in maths and know basics of physics.
Thanking you,
Regards,
Akshay.
--
You received this message because
Hello,
My name is Mallipeddi Akshay. I am a computer science student from
India. I have good learning experience with python, previously I worked on
machine learning using python. I have gone through some basics of SymPy. I
am here to get some help so that I can participate in GSoC-2017
to the SymPy community by
fixing few bugs. Can someone please help me in doing things step by step?
Once I get boosted, I can contribute more.
Thanking you,
Regards,
Akshay.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubs
Hello, I am Akshay Nagar a GSOC aspirant interested in ODE
. My current proposal idea entails the application of Lie groups to second
order odes.
I have a question though, the ideas page mentions about separation ansatz.
I read the research paper mentioned thoroughly and I think I might
Hello
This is Akshay Siramdas, from JNTUH, Hyderabad, India. I'm very interested
in improving the "solving module" for Ordinary Differential equations. I
have a keen interest in mathematics especially on calculus. I have
partially read the code on
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/b
Hi,
I have implemented all the 3-D entities like Point3D, Line3D and Plane. And
i have also implemented the hyperbola class. But the thing which i could
not fully implement was the Parabola class. Here
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7803 is the link to the PR. Feel free
to work on that.
Here is the link to the code
https://github.com/akshayah3/sympy/blob/master/sympy/geometry/point.py
The reason for the classes to be tightly coupled was to enable such
computations
a = Point3D(1,2,3)
a.distance(Point(2,3)) This returns the distance between these two points.
This is one of the
https://github.com/akshayah3/sympy/blob/Point/sympy/geometry/point.py Sorry
this is the correct link to the code.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
My opinion was that it does not make sense to calculate anything
between 3D and 2D points, as they live in different spaces. However
there should be a way to promote 2D point to 3D like the following:
plane = ... # some object representing a 2D plane in 3D space
point = ... # some 2d point
Me ,Sudhanshu and Harsh are willing to give a talk. Here is the link to our
proposal http://in.pycon.org/funnel/2014/166-symbolic-computing-with-sympy.
It will not be a long workshop hence less topics were added, we will
change it accordingly though(time).
--
You received this message
There is a way to reduce the variance, instead of evaluating at the end i.e
print((pcq/prq).evalf()) evaluate the random points in the beginning
itself
p = c1.random_point().evalf()
q = c1.random_point().evalf()
r = c1.random_point().evalf()
Using the above method i get the values with
@certik @asmeurer I have made the changes you suggested. I have put
everything that i thought of in the application
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application--Akshay--Geometry-Modulehttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsympy%2Fsympy%2Fwiki%2FGSoC-2014
@certik @asmeurer Could you please review my proposal at melange and post
your comments as the application deadline is fast approaching? Here is the
link to my proposal at
wiki
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application--Akshay--Geometry-Module.
Thanks,
Akshay
--
You received
@certik
I have updated my proposal
at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application--Akshay--Geometry-Module.
Please take some time to review it.
Thanks
Akshay
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from
Hi Certik,
I wrote a wiki page, Please take a look.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application--Akshay--Geometry-Module.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
I have added the tentative timeline, Do have a look.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
I actually expected this question :).Anyway that was the formula for the
intersection of 2 lines in 2-d but now we have both 2-d and 3-d and also
apart from that there are segments and rays so we have to consider the
intersection of line and line in 2-d and 3-d and line and ray in 2-d 3-d
Only problem is this is not hard but tedious as there are a lot of
permutations line , segment and rays(2-d and 3-d) and note that there are
no ready made formulas for rays and segments unlike lines .Maybe his might
not take the amount of time I mentioned ,If time is left I would like to
@ondrej Thanks for the quick reply .
As you pointed out I have been working on the prototype for past few days
and for the intersection of two lines it looks something like this:
a = Line(Point(1,2,3),Point(2,3,4))
b = Line(Point(5,5,5),Point(-8,-6,-3))
a.interection(b) = Point(-1.5, -0.5,
c=Line(Point(2,3), Point(3,5)) # Here the default value of z is taken as 0
I meant that the z co-ordinate of the point is taken as 0.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
Thanks for the book , I'll surely go through it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
@asmeurer Could you post your reviews on this one?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
@asmeurer Thanks for the reply. First of all the current geometry module
supports entities like point,line,rays,segment in 2d.To extend it to 3d the
algorithms for all the existing methods need to be written from scratch as
they can't be extended as such, and also have to include a new
@smichr I agree that there are a lot of visualisation libraries for
geometry but there are very few computational geometry libraries especially
in python(atleast that's what googlesaid). With sympy's features we
could make a more flexible 3d module for example using symbols and
Yes i think so too, and even there is a scope of implementing Parabolae and
Hyperbolae classses in the current geometry module.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
suggestions on the idea will be valuable.
Akshay.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
for it.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Akshay akshayn...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hello,
I'm Akshay ,a second year undergraduate majoring in Electronics. I will
be
applying for gsoc this year.My main area of interest is Geometry, I have
submitted a couple of commits
@Christophe
I thought of that but Ellipse and Circle have already been
implemented.Furthermore one class cannot generalise all these conic
sections as some have certain properties which are unique and cannot be
generalised to others.
--
You received this message because you are
Hello,
I'm Akshay ,a second year undergraduate majoring in Electronics. I will be
applying for gsoc this year.My main area of interest is Geometry, I have
submitted a couple of commits to the Geometry module ,so I would say I'm
comfortable with the code base.My idea is to extend the current
On Feb 23, 6:50 am, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 February 2012 20:30, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote: Hi
Krastaonv
Thanks for the feedback. You bring up a number of important issues. I'd like
to respond to the main one
I completely agree
options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.
From ea9562fbfea553e9e561d917f544f2156dda00f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akshay Srinivasan akshaysriniva...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:51:27 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Symbols with lambdify
---
sympy
Okay, I used hasattr instead. I should really stop using quick expedients :)
All the tests passed.
On Jun 3, 11:54 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Akshay Srinivasan
akshaysriniva...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch fixes issue #1656
This looks good
--
The program took about 70MB of RAM.
On 04/16/10 21:09, Akshay Srinivasan wrote:
I don't think I can really help with why Sympy takes so much RAM; but
I just ported your code to GiNaC - C++ - just to see how it fares in
comparison. Here are the results
Can this be passed in now? I didn't see any more comments on the
issues page.
On Mar 30, 11:08 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Thanks!
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:01 PM,AkshaySrinivasan
akshaysriniva...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds support for the integration of functions of
I think trigsimp is too hack-ish. I'll try implementing the algorithm
given at http://vv.cn/d/d.aspx?Id=21987_1.0.42119 - I guess this is
the one Ondrej was talking about - in the coming weeks. I'm still not
sure how good it is, does anyone know of anything better ?
Akshay
On Apr 28, 6:52 pm
on the webpage, do you know where it is ?
Akshay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy
You could try doing this :
x,k=symbols('xk')
f= lambda n : Integral(x**k*exp(-x),(x,0,oo)).subs(k,n)
f(2)
Integral(x**2*exp(-x), (x, 0, oo))
f(2).doit()
2
This works only for integers, for real n, try making use of quad in
scipy - and libmpf (?).
On Apr 18, 5:53 am, Minjae Kim
How come there are two data descriptors:
x.is_Real and x.is_real
for the same thing ??
On Apr 17, 12:31 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
It's just a docstring
Turns out, aima-python isn't exactly ideal for use in sympy yet. So
it'll need quite a lot of tweaking :)
On Apr 3, 10:24 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Akshay,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Akshay Srinivasan
akshaysriniva...@gmail.com wrote:
I finished my application
I finished my application at last :) . I'd be glad if you could go
through it again.
http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/GSoC2009Application/AkshaySrinivasan
On Apr 2, 2:53 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Akshay
On Apr 1, 11:49 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Akshay!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Akshay Srinivasan
akshaysriniva...@gmail.com wrote:
I started working on my application of late. Please have a look at:
http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/GSoC2009Application/AkshaySrinivasan
probably
shouldn't even mention this explicitly, it is more or less implied.
Akshay
On Apr 1, 11:49 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Akshay!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Akshay Srinivasan
akshaysriniva...@gmail.com wrote:
I started working on my application of late. Please have
I started working on my application of late. Please have a look at:
http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/GSoC2009Application/AkshaySrinivasan
Criticisms welcome :)
On Mar 25, 8:20 pm, Akshay Srinivasan akshaysriniva...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, I plan to do much of the work around the new assumptions system
Yes, I plan to do much of the work around the new assumptions system;
I'll probably keep a port of Fabian's assumptions system, until the
logic module is accepted. :)
On Mar 25, 8:42 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Akshay!
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Akshay Srinivasan
| |_ Graphviz Support, use yapgvb
|
|_ Logic
|_ Predicate , first order
About me:
I'm a sophomore undergraduate student in Chemical Engineering at the
National Insitute of Technology, Surathkal (http://nitk.ac.in).
I still have to prepare a timeline.
Akshay
offset any slowdown because of using the layer.
This will make the things in sympy.core much easier to debug.
Am speaking gibberish?
On Mar 22, 4:02 pm, Vinzent Steinberg
vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 4:04 pm, Akshay Srinivasan akshaysriniva...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mar 21, 3
, maybe you can join forces? He needs help with
implementing backward chaining.
That'll be great! Looking forward to working with Fabian.
A rewrite of the whole assumptions system should take a fairly long
time,
from what I reckon.
Thank you for your work!
Vinzent
On Mar 20, 3:59 am, Akshay
Here is a nice paper on Trignometric Simplification -
http://vv.cn/d/d.aspx?Id=21987_1.0.42119
On Feb 28, 3:31 pm, Akshay Srinivasan akshaysriniva...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had this problem with the simplification of Boolean expressions.
There's this algorithm by Quine-McCluskey where
version.
As a sidenote, should this fail ?
((-x)**2)**Rational(1,3) == ((-x)**Rational(1,3))**2
Documentation for x says its assumed to be real. But neither ,
x.is_real
x.is_Real
False
returns True.
2009/3/20 Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Akshay Srinivasan
if this is done, then probably the new sympy.core.logic module
can be rolled out with the assumptions system. This way it can serve
both purposes, without the redundancy.
I'll make sure to document it better in the next patch :)
On Mar 16, 9:41 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Akshay
to bring it
back from obsoletion, than write something from scratch - I haven't
really had a look at the old Sets module.
On Feb 20, 12:52 pm, Friedrich Hagedorn friedric...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:10:40PM -0800, Akshay Srinivasan wrote:
I was thinking of making a Abstract
I was thinking of making a Abstract Algebra module, continuing from
here. Mathematica already has this feature. It would be nice to have
something similar in python.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
If you're using Fedora 10, I guess doing
yum install python-sympy
should do the trick.
On Feb 16, 6:22 pm, sunny sharma sunnysharma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I wanna use sympy codes. But I am facing a problem installing sympy in my
system. I use fedora as my linux distro . Please help.
Hi Ondrej,
I think I've fixed it. As you said, it was something in the printing/
str.py.
In doing that I came across this,
(x/sin(x)).args()
(x,sin(x))
(cos(x)/sin(x)).args()
(1/sin(x),cos(x))
Shouldn't
(cos(x)/sin(x)).args()
give
(cos(x),1/sin(x))
??
Akshay (Neptune)
On Jan 18, 12:06 am
I've attached the patch to the issue's page - it's just a one-line
change :)
Akshay
On Jan 18, 8:58 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Akshay Srinivasan
akshaysriniva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
I think I've fixed it. As you said
57 matches
Mail list logo
