[sympy] Re: Sending updates

2008-12-30 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 30, 2:58 pm, Alan Bromborsky abro...@verizon.net wrote: Ondrej Certik wrote: OK all tests now pass patch attached.  Documentation not yet included. Documentation archive is 2.8MB (not tarred and zipped) is this OK to put in distribution. That's quite big --- could you post it

[sympy] Re: Sending updates

2008-12-30 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 30, 3:15 pm, Alan Bromborsky abro...@verizon.net wrote: mabshoff wrote: SNIP Hi,  galgebra_doc.tgz 4058KViewDownload Not to be pissy here, but you just send a 4MB archive to the list. Cheers, Michael Should I have sent it directly to Ondrej? Well, Ondrej wrote: That's

[sympy] Re: Sending updates

2008-12-30 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 30, 4:33 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Alan Bromborsky abro...@verizon.net wrote: SNIP I think we should have just one input format, e.g. if we figure how to convert rst to latex, would it be fine with you? E.g. we could have everything

[sympy] Re: patch review

2008-12-01 Thread mabshoff
On Dec 1, 12:07 pm, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Vinzent Steinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sage has problems with reviewing patches: http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2008/11/sage-patch-review.html I think our current patch review system could be

[sympy] Re: How to Include documentation

2008-11-25 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 25, 3:56 pm, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Alan Bromborsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi Alan! On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Alan Bromborsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am documenting the new geometric algebra

[sympy] Re: idea for sympy.org webpage

2008-05-24 Thread mabshoff
On May 25, 3:00 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ondrej, I think I'd like to have both -- a simple online shell without a login, that would just work and be fast. And a full featured notebook interfaces with logins, much like the current knoboo.  But the latter is imho not

Re: compiling functions to machine code

2008-04-08 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 8, 2:50 pm, Vinzent Steinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3 Apr., 13:35, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP Yep, and since there are also a bunch of Sympy users on Windows some of the assumptions about the presence of gcc might not hold. Sage is getting ported to MSVC

Re: compiling functions to machine code

2008-04-03 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 2, 10:58 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is very interesting. I actually implemented something along these lines (but not near as complete) before implementing the fast_float stuff. Clearly nothing is going to beat custom-crafted C, but you've given me some