Hey there people of the mailing list! Below is a copy of an email I
sent to Ondrej
asking about how I can do something for my projectanyone got any
ideas please help! :)
Hi there Ondrej...
I love your project, I would like to support it once I have gotten my
head round it a bit more...
I
hello there, i'm only new to this project (and haven't started helping
at all
yet...) but wouldn't it be better to retain both versions and give
them
slightly different names (and explain there are two in docstrings)? I
am
presuming that the version which modifies the matrix in situ is faster
and sell it or something, I also
don't want some cheeky company taking my ideas and patenting them as
if they were their own (and then possibly suing me for using 'their'
idea some way down the line -- apparently this is happening)
Thanks very much for the note, Tim (physNut)
On Jun 22, 1:04 pm, Felix
Hey there Ondrej,
Do you think it would be a good idea to include MPI/BSP
parallelization capability? I think there will probably be no big
problem in using the modules already included with scipy/Scientific
for that, but perhaps integrated into sympy could be good if it is to
be a fully
