Am 22.11.2011 01:58, schrieb Matt Habel:
For example,
raises needs a string that has functions in it. This doesn't register
as the function being used so the import is worthless in flakes mind.
Hm. Maybe the Sympy should make raises() accept lambdas.
That wouldn't work for statements, but I
Am 22.11.2011 01:40, schrieb Aaron Meurer:
if there
are for example extra imports there, then they should be removed.
For what it's worth, when I tried to import Sympy into Eclipse, having
an unused import warning on a module would not be uncommon.
Regards,
Jo
--
You received this message
Am 23.11.2011 01:45, schrieb Aaron Meurer:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Joachim Durchholzj...@durchholz.org wrote:
Am 22.11.2011 01:58, schrieb Matt Habel:
For example,
raises needs a string that has functions in it. This doesn't register
as the function being used so the import is
I started working on functions and noticed it was smaller than it
looked. So could I add in some other smaller modules? I'm thinking of
core, assumptions, concrete, combinatorics, integrals, logic,
matrices, series and printing.
On Nov 21, 4:20 pm, Matt Habel habel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
Sure, you are always welcome to do more :).
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Matt Habel habel...@gmail.com wrote:
I started working on functions and noticed it was smaller than it
looked. So could I add in some other smaller modules? I'm thinking of
core, assumptions, concrete,
Pylint is giving me a buttload of errors that don't really seem like
errors. The tests run and pass fine, so I really can't figure out what
pylint is complaining about. Maybe I set it up wrong?
On Nov 21, 4:54 pm, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
The functions module is fine. I just tried
Exactly. This is why I put that warning in there. I was thinking of
pylint. There's supposed to be a way to customize pylint, so that you
can disable the useless warnings. Otherwise, I would just stick to
pyflakes.
And note that sometimes the tests will still pass, e.g., when a
variable is
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly. This is why I put that warning in there. I was thinking of
pylint. There's supposed to be a way to customize pylint, so that you
can disable the useless warnings. Otherwise, I would just stick to
pyflakes.
So will pyflakes be satisfactory? Or should I go the full length and
use pylint on all the things?
On Nov 21, 5:05 pm, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly. This is why I put that warning in there. I was thinking of
pylint. There's supposed to be a way to customize pylint, so that
pyflakes is fine. Good luck with your work.
On 21 November 2011 23:07, Matt Habel habel...@gmail.com wrote:
So will pyflakes be satisfactory? Or should I go the full length and
use pylint on all the things?
On Nov 21, 5:05 pm, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly. This is why I
The first one is more along the lines of what I'm asking. Lots of the
test files do things intentionally to make the tests correct logically
that don't line up with checking in lint or flakes. For example,
raises needs a string that has functions in it. This doesn't register
as the function being
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Matt Habel habel...@gmail.com wrote:
The first one is more along the lines of what I'm asking. Lots of the
test files do things intentionally to make the tests correct logically
that don't line up with checking in lint or flakes. For example,
raises needs a
12 matches
Mail list logo
