So will pyflakes be satisfactory? Or should I go the full length and
use pylint on all the things?
On Nov 21, 5:05 pm, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Exactly. This is why I put that warning in there. I was thinking of
> pylint. There's supposed to be a way to customize pylint, so that you
> can disable the useless warnings. Otherwise, I would just stick to
> pyflakes.
>
> And note that sometimes the tests will still pass, e.g., when a
> variable is not defined because that particular code path is not
> covered by the tests. You can see what lines are covered by using the
> ./bin/coverage_report.py script (I think we also have some tasks for
> this too).
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Matt Habel <habel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Pylint is giving me a buttload of errors that don't really seem like
> > errors. The tests run and pass fine, so I really can't figure out what
> > pylint is complaining about. Maybe I set it up wrong?
>
> > On Nov 21, 4:54 pm, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The functions module is fine. I just tried it, and I think they can
> >> all be fixed. The only exception would be if pyflakes has made a
> >> mistake and things that something is wrong but really isn't (this can
> >> happen sometimes due to the dynamic nature of Python).
>
> >> I think it's actually pylint, not pyflakes, that I was thinking of
> >> regarding that comment. I will modify the task description to make
> >> this clear. Note that pylint gives way more output, but a lot of it
> >> is things like "Invalid name "z" (should match
> >> [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)", but short or long names like that are
> >> actually fine. You can use pylint or pyflakes to do this task (but if
> >> you choose pylint, ignore the invalid name and "too many..."
> >> warnings).
>
> >> Aaron Meurer
>
> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Matt Habel <habel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi there mentors and others of this project, I am just following up on
> >> > my task claim from earlier today. As stated, I need to find a good
> >> > module to work on, would the functions module be okay?
>
> >> > Also, what kind of errors are skippable?
>
> >> > Thanks
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups "sympy" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> >> > For more options, visit this group
> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "sympy" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
