Re: [sympy] Re: Physics : Improving Control Module GSOC'22

2022-04-11 Thread Anurag Surendra Bhat (B20CS097)
Also a couple of doubts which probably Aaron can answer, The google platform asks for project length, before submitting a proposal and also warns that the project length should be discussed with the organization .I believe mentors are aware that this year there are 2 possible project lengths

Re: [sympy] Re: Physics : Improving Control Module GSOC'22

2022-04-11 Thread Anurag Surendra Bhat (B20CS097)
Hi SymPy community and Jason ! A few days ago I had discussed about my project of interest - *Improving And Extending SymPy's Control Module *and attached the initial draft of my proposal. I had got a general response from Jason to focus on existing bugs and adding good quality documentation.

Re: [sympy] Re: Physics : Improving Control Module GSOC'22

2022-04-05 Thread Anurag Surendra Bhat (B20CS097)
Hi Jason, Thanks for your response, it is very much appreciated .Here are some pointers from my side. I will look to search and add more bugs to solve in the proposal .Some of them are mentioned in phase 2 part of the doc currently .Bug burn down is essential. Addition of text book examples

Re: [sympy] Re: Physics : Improving Control Module GSOC'22

2022-04-04 Thread Jason Moore
Anurag, My general advice is to fix what is there, make it robust (by demonstrating on a large set of example problems), and document it extensively instead of adding new features. To gain users, it is better to have a small number of features that work really well over a larger number of

[sympy] Re: Physics : Improving Control Module GSOC'22

2022-04-04 Thread Anurag Surendra Bhat (B20CS097)
Dear Jason, I would request you and other mentors / maintainers of the physics module to have a look into it . I would be glad to have your reviews and suggestions. Thanking You, Anurag Bhat . On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 12:52:25 PM UTC+5:30 Anurag Surendra Bhat (B20CS097) wrote: > Hello