> Great. Let us know of changes.
I have just submitted my application. I believe that I corrected the
appropriate passages. Any feedback will be appreciated.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@go
Let us know if you did miss any other questions, because it probably
means that it was unclear in the template.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
>> Obviously, we know that you've fulfilled your patch requirement, but
>> it will be nice to see a summ
> Obviously, we know that you've fulfilled your patch requirement, but
> it will be nice to see a summary of what you have contributed to
> SymPy.
I will add that and recheck for other unanswered questions.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" grou
One thing: can you please add a note about your contributions to
SymPy. See the second to last bullet point in the application
template (https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/gsoc-2012-application-template).
I've made the point bold, because you aren't the only one who forgot
to do this.
Obviousl
It looks good. Go ahead and submit what you have so far at
google-melange.com, so you don't forget about it (you can edit it up
until the deadline).
I'm a big fan of what you said at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sympy/yLHpxsguI0M/4Ng4VhYYah8J,
so as far as I'm concerned, the more of thos
On 28.03.2012 17:06, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
(1) I think it would be good to extend the "usage" section to give some
non-trivial examples. It does not matter if you make the particulars
of input/output forms up, just show what you envision your code
should be able to do at t
> (1) I think it would be good to extend the "usage" section to give some
> non-trivial examples. It does not matter if you make the particulars
> of input/output forms up, just show what you envision your code
> should be able to do at the end of the summer, in a best-case
> scenario.
Hi Stefan,
I saw your proposal and it (symbolic coordinate-free differential
geometry) looks like a really interesting thing to have.
(1) I think it would be good to extend the "usage" section to give some
non-trivial examples. It does not matter if you make the particulars
of input/ou
Hi,
Some time ago I announced that I would like to work on tensor analysis
as a project for gsoc. In the ensuing discussion I came to appreciate
the need for a vector calculus framework before starting work on the
tensor module.
So here is a (preliminary) proposition for that module:
https://gith
