Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.certik
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1606 by ondrej.certik: as_sum() is not working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1606
In [1]: e = Integral(1/(x**4+1), x)
In [2]: e.as_sum(4)
Comment #1 on issue 1606 by ondrej.certik: as_sum() is not working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1606
But it works for a definite integral.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may
Comment #1 on issue 1607 by ondrej.certik: evaluating functions with
singularity should not return a number
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1607
actually, it's pretty close to wolfram alpha.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.certik
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1608 by ondrej.certik: scipy quad doesn't work with sympy
expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1608
In [1]: e = Integral(sin(x), (x, 0, pi))
In [2]: e
Out[2]:
π
⌠
⎮ sin(x) dx
⌡
0
In
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 1608 by ondrej.certik: scipy quad doesn't work with
sympy expressions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1608
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Comment #2 on issue 1607 by asmeurer: evaluating functions with singularity
should not return a number
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1607
I'm not so sure that this shouldn't be working. It's not an infinite
singularity. Maple also returns a value:
integrate(sin(x)/x,
Updates:
Cc: fredrik.johansson
Comment #3 on issue 1607 by ondrej.certik: evaluating functions with
singularity should not return a number
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1607
Right, I agree that it should work. It just doesn't seem to react on the
precision, I
don't
Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
CC: Vinzent.Steinberg
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview
New issue 1609 by smichr: sign(x).is_zero fails and sign() oddities
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1609
sign(x).is_zero fails because in complexes.py self[0] rather than
Status: Accepted
Owner: smichr
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 1610 by smichr: assumptions are ignored by subs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1610
If variables have assumptions on them, wouldn't it be a good idea to test
that those assumptions are not
Updates:
Summary: changes to be made for Python 3.0
Comment #1 on issue 1605 by smichr: changes to be made for Python 3.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1605
I couldn't find it because it was under Python3.0 with no space between the
name and
number. It's issue 1262.
10 matches
Mail list logo