Issue 1606 in sympy: as_sum() is not working

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: ondrej.certik Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1606 by ondrej.certik: as_sum() is not working http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1606 In [1]: e = Integral(1/(x**4+1), x) In [2]: e.as_sum(4)

Issue 1606 in sympy: as_sum() is not working

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #1 on issue 1606 by ondrej.certik: as_sum() is not working http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1606 But it works for a definite integral. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may

Issue 1607 in sympy: evaluating functions with singularity should not return a number

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #1 on issue 1607 by ondrej.certik: evaluating functions with singularity should not return a number http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1607 actually, it's pretty close to wolfram alpha. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Issue 1608 in sympy: scipy quad doesn't work with sympy expressions

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: ondrej.certik Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1608 by ondrej.certik: scipy quad doesn't work with sympy expressions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1608 In [1]: e = Integral(sin(x), (x, 0, pi)) In [2]: e Out[2]: π ⌠ ⎮ sin(x) dx ⌡ 0 In

Issue 1608 in sympy: scipy quad doesn't work with sympy expressions

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 1608 by ondrej.certik: scipy quad doesn't work with sympy expressions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1608 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Issue 1607 in sympy: evaluating functions with singularity should not return a number

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 1607 by asmeurer: evaluating functions with singularity should not return a number http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1607 I'm not so sure that this shouldn't be working. It's not an infinite singularity. Maple also returns a value: integrate(sin(x)/x,

Issue 1607 in sympy: evaluating functions with singularity should not return a number

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Cc: fredrik.johansson Comment #3 on issue 1607 by ondrej.certik: evaluating functions with singularity should not return a number http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1607 Right, I agree that it should work. It just doesn't seem to react on the precision, I don't

Issue 1609 in sympy: sign(x).is_zero fails and sign() oddities

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr CC: Vinzent.Steinberg Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview New issue 1609 by smichr: sign(x).is_zero fails and sign() oddities http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1609 sign(x).is_zero fails because in complexes.py self[0] rather than

Issue 1610 in sympy: assumptions are ignored by subs

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: Accepted Owner: smichr Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1610 by smichr: assumptions are ignored by subs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1610 If variables have assumptions on them, wouldn't it be a good idea to test that those assumptions are not

Issue 1605 in sympy: changes to be made for Python 3.0

2009-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Summary: changes to be made for Python 3.0 Comment #1 on issue 1605 by smichr: changes to be made for Python 3.0 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1605 I couldn't find it because it was under Python3.0 with no space between the name and number. It's issue 1262.