Re: Issue 1671 in sympy: runtests modifications for Windows

Updates: Cc: Vinzent.Steinberg Comment #22 on issue 1671 by smichr: runtests modifications for Windows http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671 I'm not sure...I went back to the old version that was in the runtests and took out the sys.path modifying behavior or test and do

Re: Issue 1591 in sympy: More strict doctests

Updates: Cc: Vinzent.Steinberg Comment #6 on issue 1591 by smichr: More strict doctests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1591 I think Ondrej's preference is for all doctests to have an explicit import showing what sympy functionality is being used. Aaron and I were talki

Re: Issue 1667 in sympy: Unexpected behaviour when calling Sum.doit().

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #9 on issue 1667 by jorn.baayen: Unexpected behaviour when calling Sum.doit(). http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1667 Thanks for looking at this! The doctests for Basic.doit currently contains the following example:

Re: Issue 1671 in sympy: runtests modifications for Windows

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #23 on issue 1671 by Vinzent.Steinberg: runtests modifications for Windows http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671 $ bin/test Traceback (most recent call last): File "bin/test", line 13, in import sympy Import

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Comment #28 on issue 1695 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 Aaron, if I understood this article correctly, you're running a 64 bit Python, even when you booted a 32 bit kernel, given your Python execut

Re: Issue 1671 in sympy: runtests modifications for Windows

Comment #24 on issue 1671 by Vinzent.Steinberg: runtests modifications for Windows http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671 I added a sys.path hack that fixes my problems and allows to run bin/test from any directory. I think it doesn't hurt, but maybe it should be made optional.

Re: Issue 1671 in sympy: runtests modifications for Windows

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #25 on issue 1671 by Vinzent.Steinberg: runtests modifications for Windows http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1671 To applied on top of your patch. Attachments: 0001-add-sys.path-hack-to-get-correct-sympy.patc

Re: Issue 1065 in sympy: Good function plotting

Updates: Cc: jorn.baayen Labels: NeedsReview Comment #6 on issue 1065 by jorn.baayen: Good function plotting http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1065 Here's something I hacked up that wraps mpmath.plot (and cplot) for sympy. I'm not sure what the best way would be t

Re: Issue 353 in sympy: piecewise functions

Issue 353: piecewise functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=353 This issue is no longer blocking issue 1695. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you star

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Comment #29 on issue 1695 by mag...@rabic.org: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 new version of the patch. tried to tidy up, and corrected some logic. there are two known issues left that I am aware of: 1. does not work for i

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Comment #30 on issue 1695 by asmeurer: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 Now in Python 2.4 and 2.6, I get Aaron-Meurer:sympy aaronmeurer(test*$)$python Python 2.6.4 (r264:75821M, Oct 27 2009, 19:48:32) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc.

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Comment #31 on issue 1695 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 Your guess was right, Aaron. But maybe this error is an "improvement", because better intervals are needed to implement it properly. -- You

Re: Issue 1467 in sympy: sorting values with imaginary numbers in radical

Comment #17 on issue 1467 by smichr: sorting values with imaginary numbers in radical http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1467 The original issue no longer causes a problem in the master branch...not sure what fixed it. ### C:\DOCUME~2\chris\sympy\sympy>\python26\python.exe Pyth

Re: Issue 1495 in sympy: minus problem

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #11 on issue 1495 by smichr: minus problem http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1495 it has already been applied and is part of master. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you s

Re: Issue 1495 in sympy: minus problem

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #12 on issue 1495 by smichr: minus problem http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1495 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you sta

Re: Issue 1501 in sympy: documentation day issues

Comment #5 on issue 1501 by smichr: documentation day issues http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1501 branch 1501 at smichr's github. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your i

Re: Issue 1614 in sympy: Real tuple argument weirdness

Updates: Status: Fixed Cc: Vinzent.Steinberg Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch Comment #7 on issue 1614 by smichr: Real tuple argument weirdness http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1614 everything in that patch is already part of master. The mpmath part provided a c