Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Comment #24 on issue 1598 by mattpap: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 But who merges all the changes. I can keep pushing my changes here, but unless (like for master) someone will oversee the updating as changes are made, you can

Re: Issue 829 in sympy: Improve simplify() to handle result from integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k)

Comment #6 on issue 829 by mattpap: Improve simplify() to handle result from integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=829 We have some progress here with new polys: In [20]: e = integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k) In [21]: e Out[21]: 2

19 issues changed in sympy

Updates: Status: Started Owner: mattpap Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0 Polynomial Labels: Polynomial Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0 Comment by mattpap: (No comment was entered for this change.) Affected issues: issue 199: Factoring univariate

Re: Issue 1509 in sympy: spelling and grammar

Comment #7 on issue 1509 by smichr: spelling and grammar http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1509 pushed to github are 3 branches 1509 = sympy changes 1509mpmath = changes related only to mpmath 1509pyglet = changes related only to pyglet I'm not able to run tests on my system b/c

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Comment #26 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 in light of Mateusz's comment above I will stop trying to rebase this on master. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Issue 1749 in sympy: Integration of acosh(x) gives wrong result

Status: Accepted Owner: plaes800 Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult New issue 1749 by plaes800: Integration of acosh(x) gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1749 In [1]: print (integrate(acosh(x), x)) x*(-1 + x**2)**(1/2)*acosh(x)/((-1 + x**2)**(1/2) -

Issue 1750 in sympy: Integration of acot(x) and atan(x) gives wrong results

Status: Accepted Owner: plaes800 Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Integration New issue 1750 by plaes800: Integration of acot(x) and atan(x) gives wrong results http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1750 In [6]: print (integrate(atan(x), x)) -log(1 + x**2)/(2 + 2*x**2) -

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Issue 1695: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 This issue is now blocking issue 353. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=353 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 353 in sympy: piecewise functions

Updates: Blockedon: 1695 Comment #31 on issue 353 by Vinzent.Steinberg: piecewise functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=353 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Comment #52 on issue 1695 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 Fixed the failures in my branch. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #53 on issue 1695 by Vinzent.Steinberg: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 1362 in sympy: Expand support for printing derivatives

Updates: Cc: ondrej.certik Labels: NeedsReview Comment #4 on issue 1362 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Expand support for printing derivatives http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1362 What about this? Do you think it should be improved or can it go in? -- You received this

Re: Issue 1047 in sympy: Suggested new assumption system

Comment #49 on issue 1047 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Suggested new assumption system http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1047 I think relational assumptions are not yet implemented. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Re: Issue 1738 in sympy: Consolidate assumptions, queries and refine in a single subpackage

Updates: Status: Started Owner: Vinzent.Steinberg Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 1738 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Consolidate assumptions, queries and refine in a single subpackage http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1738 I

Re: Issue 1349 in sympy: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_Add'

Updates: Labels: Polynomial Comment #5 on issue 1349 by Vinzent.Steinberg: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_Add' http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1349 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 1349 in sympy: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_Add'

Updates: Cc: mattpap Comment #6 on issue 1349 by Vinzent.Steinberg: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_Add' http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1349 How does this example translate to the new polys module? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or

Re: Issue 1250 in sympy: incorrect output at sympy.latex()

Comment #4 on issue 1250 by Vinzent.Steinberg: incorrect output at sympy.latex() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1250 What exactly is the bug? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You

Re: Issue 1244 in sympy: ask(x + exp(x), Q.positive, Assume(x, Q.real) returns None

Updates: Summary: ask(x + exp(x), Q.positive, Assume(x, Q.real) returns None Labels: Assumptions Comment #10 on issue 1244 by Vinzent.Steinberg: ask(x + exp(x), Q.positive, Assume(x, Q.real) returns None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1244 In [20]:

Re: Issue 1244 in sympy: ask(x + exp(x), Q.positive, Assume(x, Q.real) returns None

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #11 on issue 1244 by Vinzent.Steinberg: ask(x + exp(x), Q.positive, Assume(x, Q.real) returns None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1244 Sorry, the result is of course fine. :) -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Issue 1509 in sympy: spelling and grammar

Updates: Cc: asmeurer Vinzent.Steinberg Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #8 on issue 1509 by smichr: spelling and grammar http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1509 OK, I can still run tests through the interpreter, but my command line's ability to run

Re: Issue 1509 in sympy: spelling and grammar

Comment #9 on issue 1509 by smichr: spelling and grammar http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1509 p.s. I was working with a patched master, so those whitespace errors were mine, but there are still doctest failures in the master branch and patches for those are part of 1509:

Re: Issue 1065 in sympy: Good function plotting

Comment #10 on issue 1065 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Good function plotting http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1065 We need to think about the name, to avoid confusion with Plot(). Should we put it to sympy/plotting or sympy/utilities? -- You received this message because you are

Issue 1751 in sympy: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4

Status: Accepted Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Milestone-Release0.6.6 New issue 1751 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1751

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 829. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=829 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 829 in sympy: Improve simplify() to handle result from integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k)

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #8 on issue 829 by asmeurer: Improve simplify() to handle result from integrate(log(k**2-m**2), k) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=829 I think we need to refactor expand so that expand(log(x**2 - y**2)) returns log(x - y) + log(x +y).

Re: Issue 1469 in sympy: can't decompose error

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #4 on issue 1469 by asmeurer: can't decompose error http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1469 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1469. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1469 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1562 in sympy: Have trigsimp apply factor and Poly.cancel() to sin's and cos's

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #10 on issue 1562 by asmeurer: Have trigsimp apply factor and Poly.cancel() to sin's and cos's http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1562 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1562. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1562 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1749 in sympy: Integration of acosh(x) gives wrong result

Updates: Labels: Integration Comment #1 on issue 1749 by asmeurer: Integration of acosh(x) gives wrong result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1749 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of

Re: Issue 1509 in sympy: spelling and grammar

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #10 on issue 1509 by Vinzent.Steinberg: spelling and grammar http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1509 Thank you, I rebased your changes, removed the change to sympy.abc (as this is another issue) and pushed it in.

Re: Issue 199 in sympy: Factoring univariate polynomials and rational functions

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #14 on issue 199 by asmeurer: Factoring univariate polynomials and rational functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=199 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 317 in sympy: factor() slow

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #13 on issue 317 by asmeurer: factor() slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=317 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Re: Issue 326 in sympy: sympy.roots_.sturm(...) hangs

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #15 on issue 326 by asmeurer: sympy.roots_.sturm(...) hangs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=326 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 326. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=326 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 588. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=588 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 595. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=595 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 595 in sympy: improve polynomial algorithms: factorization and non-rational coefficients

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #4 on issue 595 by asmeurer: improve polynomial algorithms: factorization and non-rational coefficients http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=595 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 783. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=783 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 783 in sympy: factor(y/pi + y*sin(x)/pi) doesn't work

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #7 on issue 783 by asmeurer: factor(y/pi + y*sin(x)/pi) doesn't work http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=783 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1095. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1095 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1095 in sympy: Trig functions break cancel

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #4 on issue 1095 by asmeurer: Trig functions break cancel http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1095 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1097. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1097 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1097 in sympy: Poly.integrate() crash, but integrate(Poly) work

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #2 on issue 1097 by asmeurer: Poly.integrate() crash, but integrate(Poly) work http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1097 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

Re: Issue 1106 in sympy: trim fails

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #3 on issue 1106 by asmeurer: trim fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1106 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Re: Issue 1122 in sympy: _decompose in Poly slow

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #3 on issue 1122 by asmeurer: _decompose in Poly slow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1122 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1122. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1122 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1243 in sympy: bug in trim()

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #2 on issue 1243 by asmeurer: bug in trim() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1243 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1243. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1243 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1343 in sympy: Polynomial GCD examples seem to be broken

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #8 on issue 1343 by asmeurer: Polynomial GCD examples seem to be broken http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1343 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1343. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1343 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1355 in sympy: factor(expand((sin(x)+sin(y))*(cos(x)+cos(y)))) fails

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #4 on issue 1355 by asmeurer: factor(expand((sin(x)+sin(y))*(cos(x)+cos(y fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1355 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1355. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1355 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1432. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1432 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1432 in sympy: simplify gets hung up on this expression

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #3 on issue 1432 by asmeurer: simplify gets hung up on this expression http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1432 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1568. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1568 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1568 in sympy: factoring is working too hard

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #2 on issue 1568 by asmeurer: factoring is working too hard http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1568 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1587. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1587 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1587 in sympy: bugs in polynomials.txt

Updates: Blockedon: 1598 Comment #3 on issue 1587 by asmeurer: bugs in polynomials.txt http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1587 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because

Re: Issue 1751 in sympy: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4

Comment #1 on issue 1751 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1751 Here's a trivial patch fixing this. I've also made 'iff' and 'deprecated' available in sympy.utilities - I was surprised that it

Re: Issue 1751 in sympy: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 1751 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1751 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in

Re: Issue 1748 in sympy: update mpmath to 0.13

Comment #1 on issue 1748 by asmeurer: update mpmath to 0.13 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1748 You note in the commit message: A few tests had to be fixed to run in sympy. Is there any way to see what changes were yours and what changes were from mpmath? -- You received

Re: Issue 1719 in sympy: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek

Updates: Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #8 on issue 1719 by Vinzent.Steinberg: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1719 I changed your patch, now you can do from sympy.abc.upper import * without clashes and if

Re: Issue 1748 in sympy: update mpmath to 0.13

Comment #2 on issue 1748 by Vinzent.Steinberg: update mpmath to 0.13 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1748 I had to change things like 'from mpmath import ...' to 'from sympy.mpmath import *' and test files that had the same name as a sympy test file. No test were really

Re: Issue 1748 in sympy: update mpmath to 0.13

Comment #3 on issue 1748 by Vinzent.Steinberg: update mpmath to 0.13 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1748 I adapted the wording in the commit message. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.

Issue 1752 in sympy: setup.py test annoyances

Status: Accepted Owner: asmeurer Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1752 by asmeurer: setup.py test annoyances http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1752 Two things annoy me about ./setup.py test. First, if a regular test fails, then it does not run the doctests. But

Issue 1753 in sympy: update pyglet

Status: Accepted Owner: Vinzent.Steinberg Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-High Milestone-Release0.6.6 NeedsReview New issue 1753 by Vinzent.Steinberg: update pyglet http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1753 Please pull from g...@github.com:vks/sympy.git pyglet and review. --

Re: Issue 441 in sympy: patches reviewing infrastructure

Updates: Summary: patches reviewing infrastructure Status: Accepted Owner: --- Comment #17 on issue 441 by Vinzent.Steinberg: patches reviewing infrastructure http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=441 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received

Re: Issue 1748 in sympy: update mpmath to 0.13

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #4 on issue 1748 by asmeurer: update mpmath to 0.13 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1748 OK then, it looks good. All tests pass and it applies on top of master cleanly. I pushed it in. It looks

Re: Issue 1349 in sympy: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_Add'

Updates: Owner: mattpap Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.6 Milestone-Release0.7.0 Blockedon: 1598 Comment #7 on issue 1349 by mattpap: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_Add' http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1349 The problem doesn't exist in new polys. The

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Issue 1598: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 This issue is now blocking issue 1349. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1349 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1151 in sympy: Doctest fails without cache

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 1151 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Doctest fails without cache http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1151 I don't get any failures now. These problems have probably been fixed. -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Issue 1748 in sympy: update mpmath to 0.13

Comment #5 on issue 1748 by Vinzent.Steinberg: update mpmath to 0.13 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1748 As far as I know there is no issue yet, please report it to the mpmath bug tracker. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

Re: Issue 1735 in sympy: Use expr.func to get the head of expressions.

Updates: Cc: asmeurer smichr ondrej.certik fab...@fseoane.net Comment #5 on issue 1735 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Use expr.func to get the head of expressions. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1735 I'm also not sure, let's hear what the others think. -- You received this

Re: Issue 1306 in sympy: Test the rst docs' pretty printing

Updates: Summary: Test the rst docs' pretty printing Comment #29 on issue 1306 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Test the rst docs' pretty printing http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1306 I do not understand, what's the problem to test pretty printing? -- You received this message

Re: Issue 1545 in sympy: Efficient data representation in logic.satisfiable()

Updates: Cc: Ronan.Lamy Comment #4 on issue 1545 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Efficient data representation in logic.satisfiable() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1545 Ronan, which of your improvements did not get in? -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Issue 415 in sympy: sqrt(6)/2*sqrt(2) does not auto-simplify properly

Updates: Owner: asmeurer Comment #11 on issue 415 by Vinzent.Steinberg: sqrt(6)/2*sqrt(2) does not auto-simplify properly http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=415 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or

Re: Issue 516 in sympy: fix sys.path mess

Comment #8 on issue 516 by Vinzent.Steinberg: fix sys.path mess http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=516 Actually the sys.path hack is the official way to do it. Maybe we could clean sys.patch after the import, but for instance import from a path is officially dis-supported. --

Re: Issue 692 in sympy: copy (not move) isympy to isympy.py

Comment #9 on issue 692 by Vinzent.Steinberg: copy (not move) isympy to isympy.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=692 I would just add a batch file calling 'python bin/isympy' to make windows happy. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 1751 in sympy: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #3 on issue 1751 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Cannot import sympy.physics.secondquant under python2.4 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1751 Thank you. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

Re: Issue 1545 in sympy: Efficient data representation in logic.satisfiable()

Comment #5 on issue 1545 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Efficient data representation in logic.satisfiable() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1545 Nothing got in, actually. My patch needs to be thoroughly rewritten to handle internal representation as ints and also to take advantage

Re: Issue 1738 in sympy: Consolidate assumptions, queries and refine in a single subpackage

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #3 on issue 1738 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Consolidate assumptions, queries and refine in a single subpackage http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1738 Thanks! This is exactly what I had in mind, except that I didn't know how

Re: Issue 1628 in sympy: residue() function implemented

Updates: Owner: ondrej.certik Comment #4 on issue 1628 by ondrej.certik: residue() function implemented http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1628 Indeed, I can reproduce it now, one doctest fails. Let me fix this. -- You received this message because you are listed in the

Re: Issue 1362 in sympy: Expand support for printing derivatives

Comment #5 on issue 1362 by ondrej.certik: Expand support for printing derivatives http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1362 I would like to hear from Freddie --- do you still need this? I really believe we should rather implement proper operators for this, than hacking the latex

Re: Issue 1753 in sympy: update pyglet

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #1 on issue 1753 by ondrej.certik: update pyglet http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1753 All tests pass, plotting works, this patch is +1 from me. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 1695 in sympy: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #54 on issue 1695 by ondrej.certik: integral of a piecewise function gives bad result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1695 In general, vinzent's piecewise branch looks good, but: * setizelist, deinterval,

Re: Issue 1719 in sympy: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #9 on issue 1719 by ondrej.certik: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1719 Last patch is +1 from me. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 1735 in sympy: Use expr.func to get the head of expressions.

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #6 on issue 1735 by ondrej.certik: Use expr.func to get the head of expressions. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1735 I am +0 on both patches (e.g. one argument for isinstance() is that it is easy for the new user to

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #27 on issue 1598 by ondrej.certik: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 Let's improve this as Mateusz has said, then put it in (probably after the release). -- You received

Re: Issue 1719 in sympy: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek

Updates: Labels: -PassedReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #10 on issue 1719 by smichr: implement from sympy.abc import lower, greek http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1719 I get: from sympy import * from sympy.abc import S Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: Issue 1753 in sympy: update pyglet

Comment #2 on issue 1753 by smichr: update pyglet http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1753 I'm asking at pyglet to see if they can use the 1509pyglet docstring edits. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Re: Issue 1598 in sympy: New polynomials manipulation module

Comment #28 on issue 1598 by smichr: New polynomials manipulation module http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1598 I have a patch for consideration...factor() in polytools should not be returning two arguments. The commit with memo to that effect is pushed to the polys2 branch.

Re: Issue 694 in sympy: Add tests from Review of CAS mathematical capabilities, by Michael Wester

Comment #21 on issue 694 by smichr: Add tests from Review of CAS mathematical capabilities, by Michael Wester http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=694 What is it that is not being worked on...the tests or this particular test? As far as this solution filling a screen, that is no

Re: Issue 694 in sympy: Add tests from Review of CAS mathematical capabilities, by Michael Wester

Comment #22 on issue 694 by asmeurer: Add tests from Review of CAS mathematical capabilities, by Michael Wester http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=694 The file has probably a couple hundred tests only a few of which have been written out anywhere (I think the most up to date

Re: Issue 1456 in sympy: use pyflakes to identify simple bugs in sympy and fix them

Comment #1 on issue 1456 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: use pyflakes to identify simple bugs in sympy and fix them http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1456 See http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/d073a9ad2d19845 Priit wrote a tool to get a useful pyflakes report.

Issue 1754 in sympy: ArgumentIndexError referenced but never defined

Status: Accepted Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low New issue 1754 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: ArgumentIndexError referenced but never defined http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1754 Many functions have 'raise ArgumentIndexError(self, argindex)' in their

Re: Issue 1509 in sympy: spelling and grammar

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #11 on issue 1509 by smichr: spelling and grammar http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1509 I have pushed to 1509 again...lots of little dosctring edits plus a method name spelling change to secondquant' prefferd_index - preferred_index.

Issue 1755 in sympy: Broken methods for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions

Status: Accepted Owner: ronan.l...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.6.6 EasyToFix New issue 1755 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Broken methods for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1755 Using pyflakes (see issue

Re: Issue 1456 in sympy: use pyflakes to identify simple bugs in sympy and fix them

Comment #2 on issue 1456 by asmeurer: use pyflakes to identify simple bugs in sympy and fix them http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1456 There is also pychecker, which shows a lot of things similar to this (I can't get pyflakes to work, so I can't say if it does more or not).