Re: Issue 1843 in sympy: Increase coverage of ode.py

2010-02-25 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 1843 by smichr: Increase coverage of ode.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1843 I only looked at the ode part and would add the following (besides the comments that I made on your github page). Here are some typos: -# here

Re: Issue 1838 in sympy: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc.

2010-02-25 Thread sympy
Comment #1 on issue 1838 by smichr: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1838 This works in python from the left or right. 2*[1,2,3] [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3] [1,2,3]*2 [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3] 2*'o' 'oo' For sympy, however, we might want to override that

Re: Issue 1838 in sympy: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc.

2010-02-25 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 1838 by asmeurer: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1838 The motivation was this conversation on IRC: xvedejas joined the chat room. [11:43am] xvedejas: can anyone here help me with sympy? [11:43am] xvedejas: it seems to have

Re: Issue 1838 in sympy: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc.

2010-02-25 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 1838 by smichr: Add support for [0]*S(5), etc. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1838 In objection to my comment, we could reserve one of the sides (preferrably right) for the normal scalar behavior of python so [0]*S(2) would give [0, 0] and if someone

Re: Issue 1843 in sympy: Increase coverage of ode.py

2010-02-25 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 1843 by asmeurer: Increase coverage of ode.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1843 Could you make a patch with all of these changes, to be applied on top of my branch? That would be easier. Comments: Typos: Thanks for the catches. I always remember to

Re: Issue 1837 in sympy: 0**(x-2) becomes (oo)**(2-x)

2010-02-25 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #1 on issue 1837 by smichr: 0**(x-2) becomes (oo)**(2-x) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1837 commit 1837 in smichr's 1766 branch at github retains the above behavior but doesn't let the exponent and multinomial expansions