Comment #13 on issue 1797 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I agree with Aaron. I think 0.7.0 shouldn't try to support something that
hasn't been released yet, but nothing prevents us from releasing a 0.7.1
i
Comment #12 on issue 1797 by elliso...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
The next version of IPython will be released quite soon (in the next month)
and will have many new features that users will want to upgrade quickly
f
Updates:
Cc: lazov...@gmail.com
Comment #2 on issue 2480 by renato.c...@gmail.com: Lambda erases
assumptions on its variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2480
Thinking a bit more, there are some details that need to be decided:
Lambda(x, x**2) == Lambda(y, y**2) i
Updates:
Cc: elliso...@gmail.com
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Critical Testing
Comment #11 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I understand the need, but how quickly can this be fixed? From what
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #4 on issue 1782 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars(((1 + 2*x +
x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y + y), [x, y], dict=True) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1782
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/419
--
You received this mes
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 1858 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars doesn't supply
symbols when none are given
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1858
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/419
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #5 on issue 2077 by smi...@gmail.com: classify_ode() doesn't catch
a 1st_linear/separable ode
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2077
see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/418
--
You received this message because you are subs
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.1 Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #10 on issue 1797 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: fix isympy for upcoming
ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
I changed the milestone, we need to fix this *before* this release.
Otherwise
Comment #27 on issue 1117 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Setup buildbot (again)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117
I am good for now. Ideally I would like to start something like github for
sympy, so that people can host and run their codes online. Then I will be
able to support
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2488 by asmeurer: SymPy 0.7.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2488
I have created a release candidate for the 0.7.0 release. See the
downloads tab.
I need people to review the
Updates:
Blockedon: 2196
Comment #2 on issue 2164 by asmeurer: invalid assumptions for
non-infinitesimal/nonnegative
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2164
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue 2164.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2164
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starre
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue 2294.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2294
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starre
Updates:
Blockedon: 2196
Comment #4 on issue 2294 by asmeurer: Remove .is_finite assumption
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2294
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
Updates:
Blockedon: 2196
Comment #3 on issue 2486 by asmeurer: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
This suffers from the same problem as issue 2294 and also issue 2164, which
is issue 2196 ("Document assumptions"). Unless we very clearly writ
Issue 2196: Document assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2196
This issue is now blocking issue 2486.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starre
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1797
Comment #1 on issue 2487 by asmeurer: make isympy work with ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2487
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Comment #9 on issue 1797 by asmeurer: fix isympy for upcoming ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1797
Issue 2487 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group,
Comment #26 on issue 1117 by asmeurer: Setup buildbot (again)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117
If server costs become too much for you, you could start accepting
donations to keep them up. A lot of open source projects do this.
But as we discussed before, this is all you
Status: Accepted
Owner: ondrej.c...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-Release0.7.0
New issue 2487 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: make isympy work with ipython 0.11
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2487
See the https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sympy/msBkBtUss2c/di
Comment #15 on issue 2482 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
There are several packages of mpmath in Debian, and some of the older ones
do break sympy. When I, as a user, download sympy, I expect it to just
work. If I want to h
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2485 by smi...@gmail.com: multiset_partitions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2485
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/416 fixes the returning of None from
multiset_partitions.
--
You received this message becaus
Comment #2 on issue 2486 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
See issue 2294. S.Zero.is_finite == False is in perfect agreement with the
(confusing) definition of is_finite. OTOH, oo.evalf().is_finite ==
oo.evalf().is_bounded
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Labels: Polynomial Milestone-Release0.7.0 NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2484 by matt...@gmail.com: Create Poly by coefficients
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2484
Pull request is here: https://g
Comment #1 on issue 2486 by matt...@gmail.com: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
Also oo and Float('+inf') behave inconsistently:
In [1]: oo.is_finite
Out[1]: False
In [2]: oo.evalf().is_finite
Out[2]: True
--
You received this message because you
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Assumptions
New issue 2486 by matt...@gmail.com: S.Zero.is_finite == False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2486
When I change this to True or remove this property (because it is inherited
from Number anyway), I get:
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2485 by smi...@gmail.com: multiset_partitions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2485
Since multiset_partitions has been pushed but there were issues raised that
weren't addressed, I am opening
Comment #14 on issue 2482 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
There's another major reason for not bundling external libraries:
avoiding "DLL hell", i.e. the situation where there are multiple versions
of the same library conflic
Comment #13 on issue 2482 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
First of all, I have to say that I don't consider ease of porting to Py3 a
major argument. Yes, it makes things a little easier, but as Aaron said, I
can work around
Comment #12 on issue 2482 by fredrik@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
A possibility would be to remove sympy.mpmath but still bundle mpmath with
sympy (there could be a sympy download without mpmath, for use by distros),
assuming that s
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2484 by andreas@googlemail.com: Create Poly by coefficients
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2484
IPython console for SymPy 0.6.7-git (Python 2.7.1) (ground types: gmpy)
In [1]: Poly([0,1.0], Symbo
Comment #25 on issue 1117 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Setup buildbot (again)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1117
+1 to any work that any of you do in this area. :)
I have a server, and also an AWS account if needed. The AWS is not much
free, but the linode server is pretty much
Comment #11 on issue 2482 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
Btw, it is actually a problem on linux as well --- for example at work, I
don't have root access to my computer.
The bigger solution is for example EPD, Sage or Qsnak
Comment #10 on issue 2482 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: Stop bundling mpmath
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2482
I am -1 on this. On linux there is no problem installing all the
dependencies, on Mac it is a bit harder (no apt-get install scipy), and on
Windows it is way harder.
Comment #7 on issue 2160 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: List of dependencies
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2160
Here is my opinion (I agree with Aaron):
+1 to have lists of optional dependencies.
+1 to keep sympy depending on pure Python, -1 to stard hard depending on
something e
Comment #19 on issue 1262 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: fix sympy to work in
python3.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1262
Well, as I've mentioned on IRC, at least openSUSE 11.4 (and 11.3, the
previous release) use 3.1 as the default Python, I'm sure other
distributions do as
36 matches
Mail list logo
