2009/8/21 Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
Don't know whether it makes sense to add this trivial special case.
I don't see how that is a special case, but I don't like adding
special cases anyway.
I just expected for f(x).diff(x, n)
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Vinzent
Steinbergvinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/8/21 Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com
On Aug 20, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
Don't know whether it makes sense to add this trivial special case.
I don't see how that is a special
2009/8/24 Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com
Oh, ok, you are talking about that one. It returns exp(C1 + x) in the
separable case, which is default, but I think most of the other applicable
methods do what you expect, including the best hint:
dsolve(f(x).diff(x) - f(x), f(x),
couple comments:
1) the log should be informative, currently it contains lots of upd stuff
2) the lines - rows changes should be in a separate patch
otherwise it looks ok to me.
Ondrej
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Lukehazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ondrej and I cooked this patch up
Attached is the patch that implements the change from 'lines' to
'rows' in the Matrix class.
I'll have the other one finished soon, hopefully git doesn't bite me.
~Luke
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Lukehazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ondrej and I cooked this patch up together while we were at
Ondrej,
Looking at the commit history, I am seeing that there were lots of
intermediate commits having to do with the block diagonal stuff and
then other commits having to do only with the 'lines' to 'rows' stuff.
I'm not super git saavy, but it seems like we need to cherry pick the
commits in
